Dialogue

 1 Intro|      assured him of the fact, for two reasons: (1) Because the
 2 Intro|       Alcibiades answers that the two cases are not parallel.
 3 Intro|     having been easily reduced to two only, at last coalesce in
 4 Intro| Protagoras falls before him after two or three blows. Socrates
 5 Intro|         He succeeds in making his two ‘friends,’ Prodicus and
 6 Intro|         is really a master in the two styles of speaking; and
 7 Intro|   question of Protagoras, how the two passages of Simonides are
 8 Intro|           parodies, e.g. with the two first speeches in the Phaedrus
 9 Intro|     interpreter of the Poets. The two latter personages have been
10  Prot|   SOCRATES: Yes; he has been here two days.~COMPANION: And do
11  Prot|           Yes, I replied; he came two days ago: have you only
12  Prot|           and also there were the two Adeimantuses, one the son
13  Prot|          Protagoras, which of the two assertions shall we renounce?
14  Prot|         of a face. Which of these two assertions shall we renounce?
15  Prot|           is one, has clearly the two opposites—wisdom and temperance?
16  Prot|          think, he said, that the two sayings are consistent?~
17  Prot|        right in saying that~‘When two go together, one sees before
18  Prot|       good and evil. As there are two things, let us call them
19  Prot|       things, let us call them by two names— first, good and evil,
20  Prot|        compelled to choose one of two evils, no one will choose
21  Prot|          I said. But which of the two are they who, as you say,