Dialogue

 1 Intro|          pleasure rather than of knowledge, banded together against
 2 Intro|       unsatisfactory because our knowledge is defective. In the passage
 3 Intro|        ask what is the nature of knowledge, opinion, sensation. Still
 4 Intro|        to discover the nature of knowledge and false opinion. But the
 5 Intro|          by them. For her aim is knowledge; she wants to know how the
 6 Intro|          the soul moving towards knowledge. And as medicine cures the
 7 Intro|  ignorance having the conceit of knowledge. And education is also twofold:
 8 Intro|          many names and kinds of knowledge. Does not the very number
 9 Intro|          that he seems to have a knowledge of them? ‘Yes.’~Suppose
10 Intro|      Sophist, then, has not real knowledge; he is only an imitator,
11 Intro|          is known is affected by knowledge, and therefore is in motion.
12 Intro|       being, but only the other. Knowledge has many branches, and the
13 Intro|       word ‘not’ to some kind of knowledge. The not-beautiful is as
14 Intro|         but by divine reason and knowledge. And there are not only
15 Intro|           either with or without knowledge. A man cannot imitate you,
16 Intro|          no claims to science or knowledge. Now the imitator, who has
17 Intro|            dissembling / without knowledge / human and not divine /
18 Intro|         the modern view that all knowledge is of relations; it also
19 Intro|   regards both of them as making knowledge impossible. He does not
20 Intro|    relation to other branches of knowledge. Of such a science, whether
21 Intro|  arranges in order the stages of knowledge and of existence. They are
22 Intro|       all the forms of sense and knowledge as stages of thought which
23 Intro|  principle of life as well as of knowledge, like the idea of good in
24 Intro|         object of mind, which is knowledge, and out of knowledge the
25 Intro|         is knowledge, and out of knowledge the various degrees or kinds
26 Intro|      various degrees or kinds of knowledge more or less abstract were
27 Intro|         of good is the source of knowledge and also of Being, in which
28 Intro|          the stages of sense and knowledge are gathered up and from
29 Intro|       mind the form of universal knowledge. We rather incline to think
30 Intro|         think that the method of knowledge is inseparable from actual
31 Intro|          inseparable from actual knowledge, and wait to see what new
32 Intro|     enough to contain all future knowledge, and a method to which all
33 Intro|          from the whole, or that knowledge to be knowledge at all must
34 Intro|          or that knowledge to be knowledge at all must be universal?
35 Intro|         a certain extent all our knowledge is conditional upon what
36 Intro|          has all the elements of knowledge under his hand.~Hegelianism
37 Intro|       these terms. It rests on a knowledge which is not the result
38 Intro|       other abstractions. If the knowledge of all were necessary to
39 Intro|        all were necessary to the knowledge of any one of them, the
40 Intro|        all that we most value in knowledge or in life? And can that
41 Intro|       endless forms of Being and knowledge. Are we not ‘seeking the
42 Intro| anticipate the proportions human knowledge may attain even within the
43 Intro|     light on many parts of human knowledge, and has solved many difficulties.
44  Soph|        same name him who buys up knowledge and goes about from city
45  Soph|   descriptive of the sale of the knowledge of virtue, and the other
46  Soph|       the sale of other kinds of knowledge.~THEAETETUS: Of course.~
47  Soph|    concerned with speech and the knowledge of virtue.~THEAETETUS: Quite
48  Soph|          in either way sells the knowledge of virtue, you would again
49  Soph|          from the application of knowledge until he is refuted, and
50  Soph|      away notions obstructive to knowledge.~THEAETETUS: Very true.~
51  Soph|       one name and many kinds of knowledge, there must be something
52  Soph|      which all these branches of knowledge are tending, is not understood.~
53  Soph|        they are supposed to have knowledge of those things about which
54  Soph|          conjectural or apparent knowledge only of all things, which
55  Soph|          that he may have a true knowledge of the various matters about
56  Soph|          known, is acted upon by knowledge, and is therefore in motion;
57  Soph|         him who would annihilate knowledge and reason and mind, and
58  Soph|       and isolation. This is the knowledge of classes which determines
59  Soph|      divided into fractions like knowledge.~THEAETETUS: How so?~STRANGER:
60  Soph|    THEAETETUS: How so?~STRANGER: Knowledge, like the other, is one;
61  Soph|         yet the various parts of knowledge have each of them their
62  Soph|       are many arts and kinds of knowledge.~THEAETETUS: Quite true.~
63  Soph|       better if you first gain a knowledge of what they are, and in
64  Soph|          THEAETETUS: Give me the knowledge which you would wish me
65  Soph|         by a divine reason and a knowledge which comes from God?~THEAETETUS:
66  Soph|     which divides ignorance from knowledge?~THEAETETUS: There can be
67  Soph|       aware that many, having no knowledge of either, but only a sort
68  Soph|         not among those who have knowledge.~THEAETETUS: Very true.~