Dialogue

 1 Intro|         hand, the kindred spirit of Hegel seemed to find in the Sophist
 2 Intro|            anticipating Spinoza and Hegel. But his conception is not
 3 Intro|           the genius of Spinoza and Hegel. But there is a difficulty
 4 Intro|             of meaning to Plato and Hegel.~They differ however in
 5 Intro|            and dissolution. Whereas Hegel tries to go beyond common
 6 Intro|             with. But Plato, unlike Hegel, nowhere bases his system
 7 Intro|           rises from the perusal of Hegel. We may truly apply to him
 8 Intro|          the ‘process of the suns.’~Hegel was quite sensible how great
 9 Intro|            the illusions from which Hegel delivers us by placing us
10 Intro|             the understanding which Hegel resolves into their original
11 Intro|          near and present to us.~To Hegel, as to the ancient Greek
12 Intro|             how a deep thinker like Hegel could have hoped to revive
13 Intro|            Hegelian philosophy.~(b) Hegel’s treatment of the early
14 Intro|          Stoics. Thus, according to Hegel, in the course of about
15 Intro|          value of this invention of Hegel. There can be no question
16 Intro|            has been well exposed by Hegel himself (Wallace’s Hegel),
17 Intro|            Hegel himself (Wallace’s Hegel), who remarks that ‘the
18 Intro|            human comprehension. But Hegel has shown that the absolute
19 Intro|      goodness, truth.~The system of Hegel frees the mind from the
20 Intro|            he has opened to us. For Hegel has found admirers in England
21 Intro|          connected. The triplets of Hegel, the division into being,
22 Intro|      challenged and defined. For if Hegel introduces a great many
23 Intro|            every other philosopher.~Hegel would have insisted that
24 Intro|            philosophy must conform. Hegel is right in preferring the
25 Intro|             of the order of thought Hegel is reluctant to acknowledge.~
26 Intro|        acknowledge.~The doctrine of Hegel will to many seem the expression
27 Intro|            want?’~The philosophy of Hegel appeals to an historical
28 Intro|      potential and transcendent, as Hegel himself has pointed out (
29 Intro|          has pointed out (Wallace’s Hegel). The true meaning of Aristotle
30 Intro|           flux’ before Heracleitus, Hegel’s order of thought in the
31 Intro|            the history of religion.~Hegel is fond of repeating that
32 Intro|          are they not often used by Hegel himself in senses which
33 Intro|             the ‘notion’ (Wallace’s Hegel), or the ‘Being and Not-being’
34 Intro|             history of thought. But Hegel employs some of them absolutely,
35 Intro|           required in the sciences. Hegel boasts that the movement
36 Intro| intelligible by the distinctions of Hegel. Nor can we deny that he
37 Intro|           themselves to the mind of Hegel at a particular time.~The
38 Intro|           time.~The nomenclature of Hegel has been made by himself
39 Intro|            of the common people, so Hegel seems to have thought that
40 Intro|         terms to the same extent as Hegel. The language of Plato or
41 Intro|           mechanical and technical.~Hegel is fond of etymologies and
42 Intro|        abstractions are supposed by Hegel to derive their meaning
43 Intro|           from the point of view of Hegel: but we shall find that
44 Intro|          they are embodied? Has not Hegel himself delineated the greatness
45 Intro|             of philosophy which, in Hegel’s own language, ‘does not
46 Intro|            the mind of a student of Hegel, when, after living for
47 Intro|          the following:—~1. That in Hegel he finds glimpses of the
48 Intro|          great experience of it.~2. Hegel, if not the greatest philosopher,
49 Intro|            Thiere.’ The disciple of Hegel will hardly become the slave
50 Intro|            of the great banquet’ of Hegel.~