Dialogue

 1 Intro|             facts: and, 1, about the meaning of the word there arises
 2 Intro| distinguished. Sometimes the generic meaning has been narrowed to the
 3 Intro|             other cases the specific meaning has been enlarged or altered.
 4 Intro|              the like. Sometimes the meaning is both narrowed and enlarged;
 5 Intro|            effect is produced on the meaning of a word when the very
 6 Intro|             this tends to define the meaning. Or, again, the opposite
 7 Intro|             those words of which the meaning has been both contracted
 8 Intro|             in art,’ without any bad meaning attaching to it (Symp.;
 9 Intro|            Isocrates. Changes in the meaning of words can only be made
10 Intro|           extended and envenomed the meaning, or that he may have done
11 Intro|              annihilate the positive meaning of the word ‘just’: at least,
12 Intro|          that ‘not-just’ has no more meaning than ‘not-honourable’—that
13 Intro|              word ‘not,’ besides the meaning of ‘other,’ may also imply ‘
14 Intro|              each other. What is the meaning of these words, ‘same’ and ‘
15 Intro|             according to the natural meaning of them. Nothing can be
16 Intro|       combination? Some words have a meaning when combined, and others
17 Intro|         combined, and others have no meaning. One class of words describes
18 Intro|              only receive their true meaning when they are incorporated
19 Intro|             away unheeded, and their meaning, like that of some hieroglyphic,
20 Intro|         question which is so full of meaning to Plato and Hegel.~They
21 Intro|         readiest illustration of his meaning in conceiving all philosophy
22 Intro|           most inflated with a false meaning. They have been handed down
23 Intro|              the parts derived their meaning from one another and from
24 Intro|            true that the part has no meaning when separated from the
25 Intro|           Wallace’s Hegel). The true meaning of Aristotle has been disguised
26 Intro|              that they have the same meaning in modern and ancient philosophy?
27 Intro|            another. But is there any meaning in reintroducing the forms
28 Intro|           with the hardness of their meaning. Secondly, the use of technical
29 Intro|            new language of uncertain meaning which he with difficulty
30 Intro|             never considers that the meaning of a word may have nothing
31 Intro|             by Hegel to derive their meaning from one another. This is
32 Intro|           have no words in which our meaning can be expressed. Such an
33 Intro|            affirm that words have no meaning when taken out of their
34 Intro|              we recognize that their meaning is to a great extent due
35  Soph|             want to know what is the meaning of food for the soul; the
36  Soph|            you do not understand the meaning of ‘all.’~THEAETETUS: No,
37  Soph|            first understood your own meaning, whereas we once thought
38  Soph|         Certainly they do.~STRANGER: Meaning to say that the soul is
39  Soph|      STRANGER: But then, what is the meaning of these two words, ‘same’
40  Soph|              that words which have a meaning when in sequence may be
41  Soph|             that words which have no meaning when in sequence cannot