Dialogue

 1 Intro|      and Megara. He had much in common with them, but he must first
 2 Intro|         and which was evidently common in the Socratic circle.
 3 Intro|  discerned in his adoption of a common instance before he proceeds
 4 Intro|       sense and imagination and common language to that of opinion
 5 Intro|    before making this appeal to common sense, Plato propounds for
 6 Intro|         other times they have a common nature, and the light of
 7 Intro|      nature, and the light of a common intelligence.~But this ever-growing
 8 Intro|        really the true one. The common logicians would say that
 9 Intro|        clearly repugnant to the common use of language.~The ordinary
10 Intro|     this association and by the common use of language, which has
11 Intro|   diverging paths, we return to common sense. And for this reason
12 Intro|     open our minds; what is the common notion of all images?’ ‘
13 Intro|    qualities exist, what is the common nature which is attributed
14 Intro|       attributes was implied in common language; that heat and
15 Intro|     appears to be the answer of common sense—that Not-being is
16 Intro|   seeking to justify the use of common language and of ordinary
17 Intro|        Hegel tries to go beyond common thought, and to combine
18 Intro|         understood in a moment; common sense will not teach us
19 Intro|        of eyes and ears’ and of common sense, as well as the internal
20 Intro|       kind. We may remember the common remark that there is much
21 Intro|     side of a question only—the common sense of mankind joins one
22 Intro|   transcend experience. But the common sense or common opinion
23 Intro|         But the common sense or common opinion of mankind is incapable
24 Intro|  confused with the old, and the common logic is the Procrustes’
25 Intro|  himself out of the language of common life. He uses a few words
26 Intro|  written in the language of the common people, so Hegel seems to
27 Intro|   slightly removed from that of common life, and was introduced
28 Intro|       we able to say why of the common forms of thought some are
29 Intro|      and that we must suppose a common or correlative growth in
30 Intro|   genius of the poet and of the common sense of the man of the
31 Intro|         the trivialities of the common logic and the unmeaningness
32 Intro|         so-called philosophy of common sense. He shows us that
33  Soph|         THEAETETUS: That is the common name for it.~STRANGER: But
34  Soph|   applied to him shows that the common principle to which all these
35  Soph|      can he mean?~STRANGER: The common notion pervading all these
36  Soph|         that nature is which is common to both the corporeal and
37  Soph| attribute to motion and rest in common, cannot be either of them.~
38  Soph|         stripped him of all his common properties, and reached
39  Soph|   THEAETETUS: Yes, that is very common.~STRANGER: And do they always