Dialogue

 1 Intro|        the spell of Socrates, or subject to the operation of his
 2 Intro|          but useless. To refer a subject to a negative class is unmeaning,
 3 Intro|      animal, who may be made the subject of logical experiment; shall
 4 Intro|       which has always beset the subject of appearances. For the
 5 Intro|       and one of these must be a subject. For example, in the sentence, ‘
 6 Intro|        long, ‘Theaetetus’ is the subject, and in the sentence ‘Theaetetus
 7 Intro|         Theaetetus’ is again the subject. But the two sentences differ
 8 Intro|       difficulty inherent in the subject is increased by the use
 9 Intro|          I and the not-I, or the subject and object, the natural
10 Intro|           from the object to the subject. The Sophist first uttered
11 Intro|    implies a distinction between subject and predicate, whereas the
12 Intro|       Have they not been equally subject to accident, and are they
13 Intro|       were, which are themselves subject to so many external conditions
14  Soph|         make a long oration on a subject which you want to explain
15  Soph|         on the person who is the subject of the operation. For as
16  Soph| not-being,’ which is our present subject of dispute; and now you
17  Soph|        of condition and mode and subject could ever exist without
18  Soph|         and cannot help having a subject.~THEAETETUS: True.~STRANGER:
19  Soph|   sentence speak, and who is the subject? that is what you have to
20  Soph|      THEAETETUS: Of me; I am the subject.~STRANGER: Or this sentence,
21  Soph|    second place, it related to a subject?~THEAETETUS: Yes.~STRANGER:
22  Soph|          at all if there were no subject, for, as we proved, a sentence
23  Soph|          a sentence which has no subject is impossible.~THEAETETUS: