Dialogue

 1 Intro|        distinguish between the universal and the true, while he placed
 2 Intro|     all.~(1) If we suppose the universal separation of kinds, all
 3 Intro|      fifth principle, which is universal, and runs through all things,
 4 Intro|      rest, motion, individual, universal, which successive generations
 5 Intro|     equable and colourless and universal which could be found. But
 6 Intro|     from the individual to the universal, from the object to the
 7 Intro|     Hegelian to be the sole or universal logic, we naturally reply
 8 Intro|      others by the help of the universal solvent ‘is not,’ which
 9 Intro|        of the mind the form of universal knowledge. We rather incline
10 Intro|       knowledge at all must be universal? Do all abstractions shine
11 Intro|   individual mediated with the universal by the help of the particular.
12 Intro|     can dimly imagine how this universal frame may be animated by
13  Soph| private conversation, when any universal assertion is made about
14  Soph|   believe in their supreme and universal wisdom? For if they neither
15  Soph|       deaf to those who assert universal motion. As children say
16  Soph|        as well the doctrine of universal motion as of universal rest,
17  Soph|      of universal motion as of universal rest, and also the doctrine
18  Soph|       the connecting links are universal, and so capable of intermixture
19  Soph|    whether there are not other universal classes, which make them
20  Soph|       why some should not have universal communion with all, let
21  Soph|       STRANGER: The attempt at universal separation is the final