Dialogue

 1 Intro|             were theories of two and three principles, hot and cold,
 2 Intro|          they regard them as one, or three?’~The Stranger has been
 3 Intro|          that they are thought to be three; but to explain the difference
 4 Intro|           the universe: one spoke of three principles warring and at
 5 Intro|             absurdum. Two out of the three hypotheses are thus seen
 6 Intro|             kinds to be added to the three others? For sameness cannot
 7  Soph|            do they, as the names are three, distinguish also three
 8  Soph|              three, distinguish also three kinds, and assign one to
 9  Soph|              us they are regarded as three. But to define precisely
10  Soph|            the Sophist, first of the three: I should like you to make
11  Soph|             one said that there were three principles, and that at
12  Soph|             and above the other two,—three in all, and not two? For
13  Soph|             unmoved? THEAETETUS: All three suppositions appear to me
14  Soph|       STRANGER: And two out of these three suppositions have been found
15  Soph|              STRANGER: That makes up three of them.~THEAETETUS: To
16  Soph|             new kinds other than the three, and yet always of necessity
17  Soph|           have five kinds instead of three; or when we speak of the
18  Soph| unconsciously speaking of one of the three first kinds?~THEAETETUS:
19  Soph|            is now to be added to the three others.~THEAETETUS: Quite
20  Soph|             motion is other than the three and not other than the fourth,—