Dialogue

 1 Intro|    in the infancy of mental science, and which was born and
 2 Intro| them together in a separate science. But he is not to be regarded
 3 Intro|     logical process. Modern science feels that this, like other
 4 Intro|   rendered by him to mental science is the recognition of the
 5 Intro|    musician. And there is a science which teaches not only what
 6 Intro|   what not. This is a noble science, on which we have stumbled
 7 Intro|    to call the imitation of science, and the latter the imitation
 8 Intro|    Sophist has no claims to science or knowledge. Now the imitator,
 9 Intro|   States.) a superintending science of dialectic. This is the
10 Intro|    passed into an imaginary science of essence, and no longer
11 Intro|     of knowledge. Of such a science, whether described as ‘philosophia
12 Intro|     philosophia prima,’ the science of ousia, logic or metaphysics,
13 Intro|     as yet found the higher science which arrays them in harmonious
14 Intro|    it has a place for every science, and affirms that no philosophy
15 Intro|    cannot say that physical science, which at present occupies
16  Soph|      proceed by the help of science in the path of argument?
17  Soph|     be sure he will require science, and, if I am not mistaken,
18  Soph|     upon our free and noble science, and in looking for the
19  Soph| business of the dialectical science?~THEAETETUS: That is what
20  Soph|    that which coexists with science, a scientific or learned