Dialogue

 1 Intro|     acquainted with the Organon of Aristotle. But could the Organon of
 2 Intro|           But could the Organon of Aristotle ever have been written unless
 3 Intro| philosophies, was not dispelled by Aristotle, but by Socrates and Plato.
 4 Intro|      processes of truth and error, Aristotle, in the next generation,
 5 Intro|          the technical language of Aristotle, in the frequent use of
 6 Intro|        Plato, Xenophon, Isocrates, Aristotle, all give a bad import to
 7 Intro|        philosophers from Thales to Aristotle, and the Sophists of the
 8 Intro|    attributed, on the authority of Aristotle, the denial of predication,
 9 Intro|           endless activity of mind Aristotle in his Metaphysics has preserved
10 Intro|         him in the Republic, as by Aristotle in his Organon. Yet he is
11 Intro|   dialectic. This is the origin of Aristotle’s Architectonic, which seems,
12 Intro|          rejoicing. Most men (like Aristotle) have been accustomed to
13 Intro|         was finally established by Aristotle and the Stoics. Thus, according
14 Intro|  vibrations of a pendulum. Even in Aristotle and Plato, rightly understood,
15 Intro|        Hegel). The true meaning of Aristotle has been disguised from
16 Intro|  uncertainty of chronology;—if, as Aristotle says, there were Atomists
17 Intro|          of Socrates and Plato and Aristotle have certainly sunk deep
18 Intro|       language of Plato or even of Aristotle is but slightly removed