Dialogue

 1 Intro|         to examine the nature of discourse, and there could be no discourse
 2 Intro| discourse, and there could be no discourse if there were no communion.
 3 Intro|      not-being cannot enter into discourse, and as he was arguing before
 4 Intro|         they were. Here is false discourse in the shortest form. And
 5  Soph|          the connecting links of discourse; and therefore they do not
 6  Soph|          another do we attain to discourse of reason.~THEAETETUS: True.~
 7  Soph|          might be able to assert discourse to be a kind of being; for
 8  Soph|        determining the nature of discourse presses upon us at this
 9  Soph|        it, we could no more hold discourse; and deprived of it we should
10  Soph|          determine the nature of discourse.~STRANGER: Perhaps you will
11  Soph|         nouns or of verbs is not discourse.~THEAETETUS: What do you
12  Soph|     string together, do not make discourse.~THEAETETUS: How can they?~
13  Soph|        together do you attain to discourse; for there is no expression
14  Soph|       simplest and least form of discourse.~THEAETETUS: Again I ask,
15  Soph|        words we give the name of discourse.~THEAETETUS: True.~STRANGER:
16  Soph|         do not, combine and form discourse.~THEAETETUS: Quite true.~
17  Soph|        is really and truly false discourse.~THEAETETUS: Most true.~