Dialogue

 1 Intro|        thought, the nature of the proposition, of definition, of generalization,
 2 Intro| difficulty in apprehending that a proposition may be false as well as
 3 Intro|     simple converse of the famous proposition of Spinoza,—not ‘Omnis determinatio
 4 Intro|          a false nor an unmeaning proposition. The reason is that the
 5 Intro|       reason is that the negative proposition has really passed into an
 6 Intro|            this does not make the proposition ‘Some have not eaten’ any
 7 Intro|         self-contradictory, for a proposition implies a distinction between
 8 Intro|           term, the second to the proposition, the third to the syllogism.
 9 Intro|    connexion is there between the proposition and our ideas of reciprocity,
10  Soph|           in like manner, a false proposition will be deemed to be one
11  Soph|        other way in which a false proposition can arise.~STRANGER: There
12  Soph|      not-being has no part in the proposition, then all things must be