Dialogue

 1 Intro|  namesake, with whom on that ground he claims relationship,
 2 Intro|    the later.~3. There is no ground for disbelieving that the
 3 Intro|   And Plato does not on this ground reject the claim of the
 4 Intro|     ideas—all alike have the ground cut from under them; and
 5 Intro|   another. There is a border ground between them which seems
 6 Intro|       when he speaks of the ‘ground’ of Leibnitz (‘Everything
 7 Intro|  Everything has a sufficient ground’) as identical with his
 8 Intro| under the relative forms of ‘ground’ and existence, substance
 9 Intro|       Some of them, such as ‘ground’ and ‘existence,’ have hardly
10 Intro|   seem to require a standing ground, and in the attempt to obtain
11  Soph|   How will you maintain your ground against him?~THEAETETUS: