| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library |
| Plato The Sophist IntraText - Concordances (Hapax - words occurring once) |
bold = Main text
Dialogue grey = Comment text
1501 Intro| Hegel could have hoped to revive or supplant the old traditional
1502 Soph| of virtue, and demands a reward in the shape of money, may
1503 Intro| creature has many heads: rhetoricians, lawyers, statesmen, poets,
1504 Intro| dialogues, traces of the rhythmical monotonous cadence of the
1505 Soph| THEAETETUS: Even I can solve that riddle.~STRANGER: How?~THEAETETUS:
1506 Intro| mystery, others to the book of riddles, and go on our way rejoicing.
1507 Intro| the rest of mankind. Plato ridicules the notion that any individuals
1508 Intro| earth; or to the successive rinds or barks of trees which
1509 Intro| with the emblem, and after ringing the changes on one element
1510 Intro| year pass inward; or to the ripple of water which appears and
1511 Soph| below upwards with reeds and rods:—What is the right name
1512 Soph| the Sophist is a clever rogue who will not be got out
1513 Intro| as he supposed, firmly rooted in the categories of the
1514 Soph| the earth from seeds and roots, as well as at inanimate
1515 Intro| of thought. They are too rough-hewn to be harmonized in a single
1516 Soph| one method appears to be rougher, and another smoother.~THEAETETUS:
1517 Soph| adopted by many—either of roughly reproving their errors,
1518 Intro| like every way unto a rounded sphere.’ And a whole has
1519 Intro| They seem also to derive a sacredness from their association with
1520 Intro| circumstances they may be safely combined. In religion there
1521 Intro| but there is no peculiar sanctity or mystery in them. We might
1522 Intro| several touches of humour and satire. The language is less fanciful
1523 Intro| better than those which Plato satirizes in the Euthydemus. It is
1524 Intro| inconceivable.’ But he is too well satisfied with his own system ever
1525 Intro| depicted as endeavouring to save themselves from disputing
1526 Intro| their adversaries are thus saved the trouble of refuting
1527 Intro| be full of danger. Many a sceptic has stood, as he supposed,
1528 Soph| STRANGER: And he who is sceptical of this contradiction, must
1529 Soph| Do you observe that our scepticism has carried us beyond the
1530 Intro| assists us in framing a scheme or system of the sciences.
1531 Intro| Christ as consisting in his ‘Schicksalslosigkeit’ or independence of the
1532 Intro| contemporaries Goethe and Schiller. Many fine expressions are
1533 Soph| as they come within the scope of the present enquiry,
1534 Soph| eyes, he will laugh you to scorn, and will pretend that he
1535 Intro| admirers in England and Scotland when his popularity in Germany
1536 Intro| Ages. No book, except the Scriptures, has been so much read,
1537 Soph| water or in mirrors; also of sculptures, pictures, and other duplicates.~
1538 Soph| hunting; the one going to the sea-shore, and to the rivers and to
1539 Soph| of the imitative art, and secretes himself in one of them,
1540 Intro| world refuses to allow some sect or body of men the possession
1541 Soph| subdivide each of the two sections which we have already.~THEAETETUS:
1542 Intro| fallacy of arguing ‘a dicto secundum,’ and in a circle, are frequently
1543 Soph| grow upon the earth from seeds and roots, as well as at
1544 Intro| thinker, the disinterested seeker after truth, the master
1545 Soph| respecters of persons, but seekers after truth.~THEAETETUS:
1546 Intro| of these difficulties, he seeks—and we may follow his example—
1547 Intro| absolutely, some relatively, seemingly without any principle and
1548 Soph| are in all four parts or segments—two of them have reference
1549 Soph| not run away from us, to seize him according to orders
1550 Soph| should confuse us, but let us select a few of those which are
1551 Soph| other as the fifth of our selected classes.~THEAETETUS: Yes.~
1552 Soph| section of the art of causing self-contradiction, is an imitator of appearance,
1553 Intro| of the maxim is virtually self-contradictory, for a proposition implies
1554 Intro| of logic the follies and self-deceptions of mankind, and make them
1555 Soph| why?~STRANGER: Because, in self-defence, I must test the philosophy
1556 Soph| present are regarded as self-evident, lest we may have fallen
1557 Soph| in exchange— having the semblance of education; and this is
1558 Intro| nature of knowledge, opinion, sensation. Still less could they be
1559 Intro| justice or virtue if he have a sentiment or opinion about them. Not
1560 Soph| making a resistance to such separatists, and compelling them to
1561 Intro| the Crusaders went to the Sepulchre but found it empty.’ He
1562 Intro| memorial.~V. The Sophist is the sequel of the Theaetetus, and is
1563 Intro| God in thought. He was the servant of his own ideas and not
1564 Intro| concrete to the abstract, in setting actuality before possibility,
1565 Soph| of him;—for he may have settled down in a city, and may
1566 Intro| natures. The man of the seventeenth century is unfitted for
1567 Soph| they are, and in what they severally differ from one another.~
1568 Soph| parting, ever meeting, as the severer Muses assert, while the
1569 Intro| have several senses, which shaded off into one another, and
1570 Intro| sort is well parodied in Shakespeare (Twelfth Night, ‘Clown:
1571 Soph| have been deterred by no shame at all, but would have obstinately
1572 Soph| demands a reward in the shape of money, may be fairly
1573 Intro| Sophist, drawn out of the shelter which Cynic and Megarian
1574 Soph| of my sudden changes and shiftings; let me therefore observe,
1575 Intro| universal? Do all abstractions shine only by the reflected light
1576 Intro| human thought, like stars shining in a distant heaven. They
1577 Intro| correlative growth in them, we shrink from saying that this complex
1578 Soph| the very expression when sifted a little. Would you object
1579 Intro| regard to their original significance.~The divisions of the Hegelian
1580 Intro| that we regard the thing signified by them as absolutely fixed
1581 Intro| under which we describe him—signifying no more than this, that
1582 Intro| cases be both true. The silliness of the so-called laws of
1583 Intro| of mechanical philosophy. Similarly in mechanics, when we can
1584 Soph| a creation of a kind of similitudes.~STRANGER: And let us not
1585 Intro| Pre-Socratic philosophies are simpler, and we may observe a progress
1586 Intro| elaborate explanation. The simplicity of the words contrasts with
1587 Intro| attributed to all of them by Simplicius, is certainly in accordance
1588 Intro| them: ‘Die reinen Physiker sind nur die Thiere.’ The disciple
1589 Soph| is a whole, as Parmenides sings,—~‘Every way like unto the
1590 Intro| of them, the mind would sink under the load of thought.
1591 Intro| of mankind—Plato, Dante, Sir Thomas More—meet in a higher
1592 Soph| affirm.~STRANGER: Well, fair sirs, we say to them, what is
1593 Intro| grammatical as ‘Theaetetus is sitting’; the difference between
1594 Intro| dignifying a mere logical skeleton with the name of philosophy
1595 Soph| angler was, whether he was a skilled artist or unskilled?~THEAETETUS:
1596 Intro| Hegel will hardly become the slave of any other system-maker.
1597 Soph| spring up of themselves in sleep or by day, such as a shadow
1598 Soph| should say, if we can get the slightest hold upon him.~STRANGER:
1599 Soph| to him on some simple and smaller thing, unless you can suggest
1600 Soph| the light in bright and smooth objects meets on their surface
1601 Soph| be rougher, and another smoother.~THEAETETUS: How are we
1602 Soph| being a new-comer into your society, instead of talking a little
1603 Intro| the pirate, man-stealer, soldier, or by the lawyer, orator,
1604 Intro| speculative thinkers or of soldiers and statesmen materially
1605 Intro| believe the Hegelian to be the sole or universal logic, we naturally
1606 Intro| were once fluid and are now solid, which were at one time
1607 Soph| to be spinning out a long soliloquy or address, as if I wanted
1608 Intro| instruments of thought for the solution of metaphysical problems,
1609 Intro| the help of the universal solvent ‘is not,’ which appears
1610 | somehow
1611 Intro| enquirers, which are only in a somewhat forced manner connected
1612 | somewhere
1613 Soph| speech have been discovered sooner than we expected?—For just
1614 Soph| that I can see how we shall soonest arrive at the answer to
1615 Intro| are intended to meet. The sophisms of the day were undermining
1616 Soph| STRANGER: Then why has the sophistical art such a mysterious power?~
1617 Soph| an adaptation of the word sophos. What shall we name him?
1618 Intro| far away into the primeval sources of thought and belief, do
1619 Intro| cannot be divided from the south pole; two minus signs make
1620 Intro| that we have not really spanned the gulf which separates
1621 Soph| they are true, and that the speaker is the wisest of men in
1622 Soph| lifeless things having no special name, except some sorts
1623 Soph| kind of ignorance which specially earns the title of stupidity.~
1624 Soph| unfavourable position of the spectator, whereas if a person had
1625 Intro| separates them. They are ‘the spectators of all time and of all existence;’
1626 Soph| exclude any one who has ever speculated at all upon the nature of
1627 Intro| He is no longer under the spell of Socrates, or subject
1628 Intro| does not regret the time spent in the study of him. He
1629 Intro| flies we are caught in the spider’s web; and we can only judge
1630 Soph| then to kindred dialectical spirits.~THEAETETUS: Very good.~
1631 Intro| intelligent Athenian, with the splendid foreigners who from time
1632 Soph| that to be derived from the sponge, and has not more interest
1633 Intro| meet Socrates at the same spot, bringing with them an Eleatic
1634 Intro| change, number, seem to have sprung up contemporaneously in
1635 Soph| cross-examining deity, who has come to spy out our weakness in argument,
1636 Soph| which they are not able to squeeze in their hands.~THEAETETUS:
1637 Intro| some principle of rest or stability. And as children say entreatingly, ‘
1638 Intro| peculiar to himself. The first stage of his philosophy answers
1639 Intro| of Plato could not have stamped the word anew, or have imparted
1640 Intro| in what relation did they stand to one another and to the
1641 Intro| having the true and only standard of reason in the world?
1642 Intro| reflection we seem to require a standing ground, and in the attempt
1643 Intro| Parmenides, the Sophist stands in a less defined and more
1644 Intro| reach of human thought, like stars shining in a distant heaven.
1645 Soph| Sophist and the angler, starting from the art of acquiring,
1646 Intro| the minds of others. He starts from antecedents, but he
1647 Soph| any one denies our present statement [viz., that being is not,
1648 Soph| absurdity in calling motion stationary.~THEAETETUS: Quite right,—
1649 Intro| wares to another country, he stays at home, and retails goods,
1650 Soph| may still be a chance of steering our way in between them,
1651 Intro| existence. They are the steps or grades by which he rises
1652 Intro| when the very term which is stigmatized by the world (e.g. Methodists)
1653 Intro| like Plato, he ‘leaves no stone unturned’ in the intellectual
1654 Intro| danger. Many a sceptic has stood, as he supposed, firmly
1655 Soph| must every one of them be stormed before we can reach the
1656 Soph| repeated each his own mythus or story;—one said that there were
1657 Intro| or other of them; they go straight on for a time in a single
1658 Soph| but now we are in a great strait. Please to begin by explaining
1659 Soph| and especially the god of strangers, are companions of the meek
1660 Intro| the deposits of geological strata which were once fluid and
1661 Intro| regarded as a mere waif or stray in human history, any more
1662 Soph| true.~STRANGER: But the stream of thought which flows through
1663 Soph| knows nothing of mirrors and streams, or of sight at all; he
1664 Soph| STRANGER: And yet we say that, strictly speaking, it should not
1665 Soph| however many of them you string together, do not make discourse.~
1666 Intro| attributed to it be very stringent, seeing that the successive
1667 Soph| agents—neither in this way of stringing words together do you attain
1668 Soph| used, and the fish is not struck in any chance part of his
1669 Intro| be harmonized in a single structure, and may be compared to
1670 Intro| the chain of Being. The struggle for existence is not confined
1671 Intro| vernacular Latin of priests and students. The higher spirit of philosophy,
1672 Soph| adequately treated, they must be studied in the lesser and easier
1673 Intro| science, on which we have stumbled unawares; in seeking after
1674 Soph| specially earns the title of stupidity.~THEAETETUS: True.~STRANGER:
1675 Soph| from the grasp of such a sturdy argument?~THEAETETUS: To
1676 Soph| follow him up until in some sub-section of imitation he is caught.
1677 Intro| than in mediocrity. The sublimer intelligences of mankind—
1678 Intro| them, but he must first submit their ideas to criticism
1679 Intro| reigned supreme, now they are subordinated to a power or idea greater
1680 Intro| system of philosophy and subordinating it to that which follows—
1681 Intro| became relative in the subsequent history of thought. But
1682 Intro| and another, of a more subtle nature, which proceeds upon
1683 Intro| Parmenides he shows an Hegelian subtlety in the analysis of one and
1684 Intro| not refuted, by those who succeed them. Once they reigned
1685 Intro| encouraging sign of our probable success in the rest of the enquiry.~
1686 Soph| mad, when you hear of my sudden changes and shiftings; let
1687 Intro| being can neither do nor suffer, though becoming may. And
1688 Intro| further the topics thus suggested, we will endeavour to trace
1689 Soph| THEAETETUS: They accept your suggestion, having nothing better of
1690 Intro| Socrates and Plato. The summa genera of thought, the nature
1691 Soph| three-pronged spears, when summed up under one name, may be
1692 Intro| the Sophist the crown and summit of the Platonic philosophy—
1693 Intro| quicken the ‘process of the suns.’~Hegel was quite sensible
1694 Intro| the Hegelian logic bear a superficial resemblance to the divisions
1695 Intro| rest of the world, ‘in the superfluity of their wits,’ were likely
1696 Intro| Crat., Republic, States.) a superintending science of dialectic. This
1697 Intro| have hoped to revive or supplant the old traditional faith
1698 Intro| was felt in one school was supplemented or compensated by another.
1699 Intro| They were all efforts to supply the want which the Greeks
1700 Intro| in his system a new logic supplying a variety of instruments
1701 Intro| and not unless they are supported by a strong current of popular
1702 Intro| discredited. There is nothing surprising in the Sophists having an
1703 Soph| not great, and is yet as susceptible of definition as any larger
1704 Intro| logical, so we have reason for suspecting that the Hegelian logic
1705 Soph| among arguments, until he suspects and fears that he is ignorant
1706 Intro| movement is not without suspicion, seeming to imply a state
1707 Intro| are some of the doubts and suspicions which arise in the mind
1708 Intro| he likes (Wallace). He is suspicious of a distinction which is
1709 Intro| Statesman had preceded? The swarm of fallacies which arose
1710 Soph| sometimes prevailing under the sway of Aphrodite, and then again
1711 Intro| all theories alike are swept away; the patrons of a single
1712 Intro| The pendulum gave another swing, from the individual to
1713 Intro| parts. Then the pendulum swung to the other side, from
1714 Intro| help of the particular. Of syllogisms there are various kinds,—
1715 Intro| and the like; thirdly in syllogistic forms of the individual
1716 Intro| them that peculiar Greek sympathy with youth, which he ascribes
1717 Intro| are many such imperfect syncretisms or eclecticisms in the history
1718 Intro| definition, of generalization, of synthesis and analysis, of division
1719 Intro| become the slave of any other system-maker. What Bacon seems to promise
1720 Intro| of thought. And in later systems forms of thought are too
1721 Soph| caught. For our method of tackling each and all is one which
1722 Soph| and nature of existences, talked to us in rather a light
1723 Intro| the many other writers and talkers at Athens and elsewhere,
1724 Intro| thing, e.g. white, good, tall, to man; out of which tyros
1725 Soph| of them to be visible and tangible, or are they all invisible?~
1726 Intro| disappeared, and those who have no taste for abstruse metaphysics
1727 Intro| the result of a long and tedious enquiry; by a great effort
1728 Intro| expressly accuses himself of a tediousness in the two dialogues, which
1729 Soph| children of the dragon’s teeth, would have been deterred
1730 Intro| inductive, mechanical, teleological,—which are developed out
1731 Soph| But, if so, I was wrong in telling you just now that the difficulty
1732 Intro| though traces of a similar temper may also be observed in
1733 Intro| Megarian paradoxes have temporarily afforded him, is proved
1734 Intro| characters represented by them, tended to pass into one another.
1735 Intro| the moral and intellectual tendencies of his own age; the adversary
1736 Intro| obnoxious or derided class; this tends to define the meaning. Or,
1737 Intro| denied predication; and this tenet, which is attributed to
1738 Intro| maintainer of particular tenets.~But the real question is,
1739 Intro| same who are said in the Tenth Book of the Laws to attribute
1740 Soph| I cannot be mistaken in terming him the true and very Sophist.~
1741 Soph| often met with such men, and terrible fellows they are.~STRANGER:
1742 Soph| in self-defence, I must test the philosophy of my father
1743 Soph| not-being is.’~Such is his testimony, which is confirmed by the
1744 Soph| handicraft arts, but what, thanks to us, has been termed education
1745 Soph| by these discoveries of theirs, which they believe to be
1746 | thence
1747 Intro| world, not exactly in the theological sense, yet in one not wholly
1748 | thereby
1749 | therein
1750 Intro| human things there is a thesis and antithesis, a law of
1751 Intro| reinen Physiker sind nur die Thiere.’ The disciple of Hegel
1752 Intro| nearly related to tyrants and thieves, and the Sophist is the
1753 Intro| the widest and also the thinnest of human ideas, or, in the
1754 Intro| tells us, ‘he lived for thirty years in a single room,’
1755 Intro| mankind—Plato, Dante, Sir Thomas More—meet in a higher sphere
1756 Soph| new friend unskilled, or a thorough master of his craft?~THEAETETUS:
1757 | thou
1758 Intro| Protagoras or Gorgias, or even Thrasymachus, who all turn out to be ‘
1759 Intro| gradually developed. The threefold division of logic, physic,
1760 Soph| sifting, straining, winnowing, threshing.~THEAETETUS: Certainly.~
1761 Intro| questions which lie at the threshold of mathematics and of morals
1762 Intro| other to have a share in the throne. This is especially true
1763 | Throughout
1764 | thy
1765 Soph| STRANGER: Some in the singular (ti) you would say is the sign
1766 Intro| of the demigods’ (Plato, Tim.), or with ‘a golden pair
1767 Soph| of one, some in the dual (tine) of two, some in the plural (
1768 Soph| two, some in the plural (tines) of many?~THEAETETUS: Exactly.~
1769 Intro| ordinarily understood are tiresome because they are unmeaning,
1770 Intro| mankind is reflected.~A milder tone is adopted towards the Sophists
1771 Soph| did not care whether they took us with them, or left us
1772 Intro| Before analyzing further the topics thus suggested, we will
1773 Intro| puzzle of Achilles and the tortoise, we relegate some of them
1774 Intro| opposition may be either total or partial: the not-beautiful
1775 Soph| things only which can be touched or handled have being or
1776 Intro| accurate, and has several touches of humour and satire. The
1777 Intro| complex to admit of our tracing in them a regular succession.
1778 Intro| like those of other retail traders; his art is thus deprived
1779 Intro| revive or supplant the old traditional faith by an unintelligible
1780 Intro| quoted from Herodotus and the tragedians, in which the word is used
1781 Intro| distinguished by the remarkable traits which are attributed to
1782 Intro| truths which are supposed to transcend experience. But the common
1783 Intro| other only potential and transcendent, as Hegel himself has pointed
1784 Intro| Hegelianism may be said to be a transcendental defence of the world as
1785 Intro| be the other of ‘Being.’ Transferring this to language and thought,
1786 Intro| method, he delights also to transfix the Eristic Sophist with
1787 Intro| relation to one another—the transition from Descartes to Spinoza
1788 Intro| to us is ridiculous and transparent,—no better than those which
1789 Soph| and difference or other, traverse all things and mutually
1790 Soph| more exact thinkers who treat of being and not-being.
1791 Soph| subjects are to be adequately treated, they must be studied in
1792 Intro| inhere in a flower or a tree or in any other concrete
1793 Soph| THEAETETUS: I did.~STRANGER: I tremble at the thought of what I
1794 Soph| know that such persons are tremendous argufiers, and are able
1795 Intro| Impossible.’ Then what is the trick of his art, and why does
1796 Intro| dissolution. Whereas Hegel tries to go beyond common thought,
1797 Intro| etymologies and often seems to trifle with words. He gives etymologies
1798 Soph| a single moment, however trifling the cause and however slight
1799 Intro| ideas may be connected. The triplets of Hegel, the division into
1800 Soph| he who would not be found tripping, ought to be very careful
1801 Soph| creature will ever escape in triumph.~THEAETETUS: Well said;
1802 Intro| the human mind above the trivialities of the common logic and
1803 Soph| philosopher, who has the truest reverence for these qualities,
1804 Intro| familiar and unconscious truism, which no one would any
1805 Intro| those general or a priori truths which are supposed to transcend
1806 Intro| of the Republic, appears ‘tumbling out at our feet.’ Acknowledging
1807 Intro| there had only existed a tumultuous chaos of mythological fancy,
1808 Soph| the third place, he has turned out to be a retailer of
1809 Intro| the examination of being. Turning to the dualist philosophers,
1810 Intro| parodied in Shakespeare (Twelfth Night, ‘Clown: For as the
1811 Soph| STRANGER: For which reason twig baskets, casting-nets, nooses,
1812 Intro| philosophy of a narrower type is capable of comprehending
1813 Intro| himself in them. Moreover the types of greatness differ; while
1814 Intro| Plato, became in turn the tyrant of the mind, the dominant
1815 Intro| prey, nearly related to tyrants and thieves, and the Sophist
1816 Intro| grounded on the likeness of his ugly face. But in neither dialogue,
1817 Intro| Sophist, or that his will ultimately prove to be the desired
1818 Intro| contradiction appears to be unavoidable. Is not the reconciliation
1819 Intro| Nor must we forget the uncertainty of chronology;—if, as Aristotle
1820 Intro| IDEA of good is eternal and unchangeable. And the IDEA of good is
1821 Intro| undergone this purification, is unclean and impure.~And who are
1822 Intro| seyn,’ ‘an sich seyn,’ ‘an und fur sich seyn,’ though the
1823 Intro| hieroglyphic, would have remained undeciphered, unless two thousand years
1824 Intro| has really passed into an undefined positive. To say that ‘not-just’
1825 Soph| making none at all, or even undergoing a repulse? Such a faint
1826 Intro| King himself, if he has not undergone this purification, is unclean
1827 Intro| sophisms of the day were undermining philosophy; the denial of
1828 Intro| There is only one of you who understands me, and he does NOT understand
1829 Intro| observe how unwilling I am to undertake the task; for I know that
1830 Soph| just now we seemed to be undertaking a task which would never
1831 Soph| Parmenides, and all ever yet undertook to determine the number
1832 Intro| recollections of a first love, not undeserving of his admiration still.
1833 Intro| him, while others have an undue prominence given to them.
1834 Intro| Tell me who? Have we not unearthed the Sophist?~But he is a
1835 Intro| instruments and methods hitherto unemployed. We may not be able to agree
1836 Soph| For now, as always, I am unequal to the refutation of not-being.
1837 Intro| war with weapons fair or unfair against the outlaw Sophist.~
1838 Soph| appear such owing to the unfavourable position of the spectator,
1839 Intro| the seventeenth century is unfitted for the eighteenth, and
1840 Intro| distinction. Not-being is the unfolding or determining of Being,
1841 Intro| Eleatic circle. And now an unforeseen consequence began to arise.
1842 Intro| thought in history. There is unfortunately no criterion to which either
1843 Soph| that I may seem rude and ungracious if I refuse your courteous
1844 Intro| which would have passed away unheeded, and their meaning, like
1845 Soph| state of impurity; he is uninstructed and deformed in those things
1846 Intro| reminding ourselves that every unit both implies and denies
1847 Intro| a double character, and unites two enquirers, which are
1848 Intro| and the many one—a sum of units. We may be reminded that
1849 Intro| us onward to the ideas or universals which are contained in them;
1850 Intro| of giving offence to the unmetaphysical part of mankind, we may
1851 Soph| soul remains absolutely unmoved? THEAETETUS: All three suppositions
1852 Intro| Nor can we deny that he is unnecessarily difficult, or that his own
1853 Intro| them. Nothing can be more unphilosophical than the denial of all communion
1854 Soph| nobody else?~THEAETETUS: Unquestionably.~STRANGER: And it would
1855 Soph| appear in various forms unrecognized by the ignorance of men,
1856 Intro| that mere division is an unsafe and uncertain weapon, first,
1857 Intro| and the answer is only unsatisfactory because our knowledge is
1858 Intro| the opportunity of more ‘unsavoury comparisons.’ For he is
1859 Soph| not-being, and yet escape unscathed.~THEAETETUS: We must do
1860 Soph| measure, which is always unsightly?~THEAETETUS: Exactly.~STRANGER:
1861 Intro| suitable to its own age, unsuitable to any other. Nor can any
1862 Intro| Plato, he ‘leaves no stone unturned’ in the intellectual world.
1863 Soph| is called thought is the unuttered conversation of the soul
1864 Intro| beyond experience and is unverified by it. Further, the Hegelian
1865 Soph| Zeus, have we not lighted unwittingly upon our free and noble
1866 Soph| a barbarism and utterly unworthy of an educated or philosophical
1867 Soph| of their fair works, the upper part, which is farther off,
1868 Intro| which were at one time uppermost in the series and are now
1869 Intro| not at all. He would have urged that the parts derived their
1870 Soph| STRANGER: I have a yet more urgent request to make.~THEAETETUS:
1871 Intro| Kant, and elaborated to the utmost by himself. But is it really
1872 Soph| fancy that when anybody utters the word, we understand
1873 Intro| Megarian or other sophistry vainly attempts to deny.~...~True
1874 Intro| and again recognizes the validity of the law of contradiction.
1875 Intro| is taken, is a real and valuable logical process. Modern
1876 Intro| representations in which the picture vanishes and the essence is detached
1877 Intro| he has learnt, from the vantage-ground of history and experience.
1878 Soph| is precisely what we have ventured to call not-being.~THEAETETUS:
1879 Intro| in Plato:—~1. They pursue verbal oppositions; 2. they make
1880 Intro| the Middle Ages was the vernacular Latin of priests and students.
1881 Soph| constructing or moulding vessels, and there is the art of
1882 Intro| empty.’ He delights to find vestiges of his own philosophy in
1883 Intro| antagonism, or of the Hegelian vibration of moments: he would not
1884 Intro| figured to the mind by the vibrations of a pendulum. Even in Aristotle
1885 Soph| magnitudes and virtues and vices, in all of which instances
1886 Intro| for example, the mind is viewed as the complex of ideas,
1887 Intro| We see the advantage of viewing in the concrete what mankind
1888 Soph| one name, as hunting with violence.~THEAETETUS: Very good.~
1889 Soph| called by some such name as violent.~THEAETETUS: True.~STRANGER:
1890 Intro| the form of the maxim is virtually self-contradictory, for
1891 Soph| whether the Sophist is not visibly a magician and imitator
1892 Intro| foreigners who from time to time visited Athens, or appeared at the
1893 Intro| excluding from the philosopher’s vocabulary the word ‘inconceivable.’
1894 Soph| not fit, so there are some vocal signs which do, and others
1895 Intro| natural consequence of their vocation. That they were foreigners,
1896 Intro| space became the atoms and void of Leucippus and Democritus.
1897 Soph| there is exchange, which is voluntary and is effected by gifts,
1898 Intro| least disposed to become the votaries of Hegelianism nevertheless
1899 Soph| letters, so that without a vowel one consonant cannot be
1900 Soph| course.~STRANGER: And the vowels, especially, are a sort
1901 Intro| to be regarded as a mere waif or stray in human history,
1902 Intro| and some of us delight to wander in the mazes of thought
1903 Intro| adversaries defend themselves warily from an invisible world,
1904 Soph| spinning, adjusting the warp and the woof; and thousands
1905 Intro| spoke of three principles warring and at peace again, marrying
1906 Intro| legislators, the five greatest warriors, the five greatest poets,
1907 Soph| argumentation, one sort wastes money, and the other makes
1908 Soph| many kinds and names, and water-animal hunting, or the hunting
1909 Soph| to my youth, I may often waver in my view, but now when
1910 Intro| enlightening his path; and it may weaken his natural faculties of
1911 Intro| was really impaired and weakened by a metaphysical illusion.~
1912 Soph| has come to spy out our weakness in argument, and to cross-examine
1913 Intro| an unsafe and uncertain weapon, first, in the Statesman,
1914 Intro| that the chains which we wear are of our own forging.
1915 Soph| the other division, we are weary and will give that up, leaving
1916 Intro| are caught in the spider’s web; and we can only judge of
1917 Soph| quite separate, and may be weighed in the scale against all
1918 Soph| men acknowledge has more weight than that which is acknowledged
1919 Intro| towards the Sophists in a well-known passage of the Republic,
1920 Soph| like unto the fullness of a well-rounded sphere, Evenly balanced
1921 Intro| repulsion. The way to the West is the way also to the East;
1922 Soph| divide genera into species; wherefore there is no great abundance
1923 Soph| of them; for, if you did, whichever of the two is identified
1924 Soph| counts one of them not a whit more ridiculous than another;
1925 Intro| to the same thing, e.g. white, good, tall, to man; out
1926 Intro| the like, are deepened and widened by the formal logic which
1927 Intro| our worship. They are the widest and also the thinnest of
1928 Soph| one class lives on the wing and the other in the water?~
1929 Soph| to do so were deemed no wiser for their controversial
1930 Intro| seems to intimate by the withdrawal of Socrates that he is passing
1931 Intro| the superfluity of their wits,’ were likely to make upon
1932 Intro| never saw pen and ink, very wittily said to a niece of King
1933 Intro| in philosophy. No one has won so much for the kingdom
1934 Soph| adjusting the warp and the woof; and thousands of similar
1935 Soph| him in the class of false workers and magicians, you see that
1936 Intro| chance, or the spontaneous working of nature, but by divine
1937 Intro| contemplate the infinite worlds in the expanse of heaven
1938 Intro| world. We appear to be only wrapping up ourselves in our own
1939 Intro| his lawyer-like habit of writing and speaking about all things,
1940 Intro| pain.’ That Antisthenes wrote a book called ‘Physicus,’
1941 | Ye
1942 Soph| true to our agreement of yesterday; and we bring with us a
1943 Intro| appreciate a great system without yielding a half assent to it—like
1944 Soph| can possibly answer the younker’s question?~THEAETETUS:
1945 Soph| How are we to call it? By Zeus, have we not lighted unwittingly