Dialogue

  1 Intro|        conducted from a theory of sense to a theory of ideas.~There
  2 Intro|          of Protagoras, or of the sense in which his words are used.
  3 Intro|          in them. The analysis of sense, and the analysis of thought,
  4 Intro|     seemed to be at variance with sense and at war with one another.~
  5 Intro|           and first of all to the sense of sight. The colour of
  6 Intro|        created, also in two forms—sense and the object of sense—
  7 Intro|           sense and the object of sense— which come to the birth
  8 Intro|           can I and the object of sense become separately what we
  9 Intro|       white or whiteness, nor any sense or sensation, can be predicated
 10 Intro|         And as there are facts of sense which are perceived through
 11 Intro|      perhaps there may still be a sense in which we can think that
 12 Intro|          confusion of thought and sense.~Theaetetus is delighted
 13 Intro|          no confusion of mind and sense? e.g. in numbers. No one
 14 Intro|           an aviary; these in one sense he possesses, and in another
 15 Intro|        because we may know in one sense, i.e. possess, what we do
 16 Intro|       feelings and impressions of sense, without determining whether
 17 Intro|         experience, from ideas to sense. This is a point of view
 18 Intro|       opinions, the impression of sense remained certain and uniform.
 19 Intro|       fixedness of impressions of sense furnishes a link of connexion
 20 Intro|           a point of departure in sense and a return to sense, also
 21 Intro|          in sense and a return to sense, also includes all the processes
 22 Intro|          the eye to the object of sense, of the mind to the conception.
 23 Intro|        higher or man in the lower sense was a ‘measure of all things.’
 24 Intro|           knowledge in any higher sense than perception. For ‘truer’
 25 Intro|           recognized as organs of sense, and we are admitted to
 26 Intro|        feelings or impressions of sense. In this manner Plato describes
 27 Intro|       presented to the mind or to sense. We of course should answer
 28 Intro|         used in the more ordinary sense of opinion. There is no
 29 Intro|       neither to the old world of sense and imagination, nor to
 30 Intro|           a confusion of mind and sense, which arises when the impression
 31 Intro|        combination of thought and sense, and yet errors may often
 32 Intro|        case of facts derived from sense.~Another attempt is made
 33 Intro|      elements may be perceived by sense, but they are names, and
 34 Intro|           that the individuals of sense become the subject of knowledge
 35 Intro|            the notion of a common sense, developed further by Aristotle,
 36 Intro|         us the inward and outward sense and the inward and outward
 37 Intro| abstracted from the operations of sense, so there are various points
 38 Intro|     sphere of mind the analogy of sense reappears; and we distinguish
 39 Intro|        the words intuition, moral sense, common sense, the mind’
 40 Intro|    intuition, moral sense, common sense, the mind’s eye, are figures
 41 Intro|           mythology was allied to sense, and the distinction of
 42 Intro|      disengage the universal from sense—this was the first lifting
 43 Intro|        that knowledge was neither sense, nor yet opinion—with or
 44 Intro|        although both must in some sense be attributed to it; it
 45 Intro|        from them. Soon objects of sense were merged in sensations
 46 Intro|         are very far removed from sense. Admitting that, like all
 47 Intro|         the five senses, and of a sense, or common sense, which
 48 Intro|         and of a sense, or common sense, which is the abstraction
 49 Intro|    abstraction of them. The term ‘sense’ is also used metaphorically,
 50 Intro|        far as they are objects of sense themselves.~Physiology speaks
 51 Intro|      analyzes the transition from sense to thought. The one describes
 52 Intro|       mind; it implies objects of sense, and objects of sense have
 53 Intro|          of sense, and objects of sense have differences of form,
 54 Intro|      colours, is not given by the sense, but by the mind. A mere
 55 Intro|           if not perceived by the sense, and the sense would have
 56 Intro|   perceived by the sense, and the sense would have no power of distinguishing
 57 Intro|           But prior to objects of sense there is a third nature
 58 Intro|      acquired chiefly through the sense of sight: to the blind the
 59 Intro|           of man.~In every act of sense there is a latent perception
 60 Intro|       think of outward objects of sense or of outward sensations
 61 Intro|       proceed to consider acts of sense. These admit of various
 62 Intro|          in thought. Memory is to sense as dreaming is to waking;
 63 Intro|         the outward to the inward sense. But as yet there is no
 64 Intro|          colour or association of sense. The power of recollection
 65 Intro|         memory which is allied to sense, such as children appear
 66 Intro|           of Hobbes, as ‘decaying sense,’ an expression which may
 67 Intro|       passivity of the other. The sense decaying in memory receives
 68 Intro|         word there is a colour of sense, an indistinct picture of
 69 Intro|      including the perceptions of sense, are a synthesis of sensations,
 70 Intro|       drawn between the powers of sense and of reflection—they pass
 71 Intro|         There is no impression of sense which does not simultaneously
 72 Intro|           some writers the inward sense is only the fading away
 73 Intro|       withdrawn from the world of sense but introduced to a higher
 74 Intro|           which, like the outward sense, she is trained and educated.
 75 Intro|      educated. By use the outward sense becomes keener and more
 76 Intro|       feebler than the faculty of sense, but of a higher and more
 77 Intro|        receives the universals of sense, but gives them a new content
 78 Intro|          dwell in the unseen. The sense only presents us with a
 79 Intro|           which are detached from sense are reconstructed in science.
 80 Intro|           the mere impressions of sense are the truth of the world
 81 Intro|           To say that the outward sense is stronger than the inward
 82 Intro|       inseparable from the act of sense are really the result of
 83 Intro|          of sight or of any other sense, of the great complexity
 84 Intro|    instinctively and as an act of sense the differences of articulate
 85 Intro|           more refined faculty of sense, as in animals so also in
 86 Intro|      ancestors peculiar powers of sense or feeling, so we improve
 87 Intro|      Berkeley, resolve objects of sense into sensations; but the
 88 Intro|      appeal to the fallibility of sense was really an illusion.
 89 Intro|        grovelling on the level of sense.~We may, if we please, carry
 90 Intro|         deny, not only objects of sense, but the continuity of our
 91 Intro|      leave on the mind a pleasing sense of wonder and novelty: in
 92 Intro|         we drift back into common sense, or we make them the starting-points
 93 Intro|        knowledge immediately upon sense, that explanation of human
 94 Intro|        truest which is nearest to sense. As knowledge is reduced
 95 Intro|     imagination, or in any higher sense for religion. Ideals of
 96 Intro|        cage, the mind confined to sense is always being brought
 97 Intro|            It loses the religious sense which more than any other
 98 Intro|    service by awakening us to the sense of inveterate errors familiarized
 99 Intro|           science in the ordinary sense of the word, are a real
100 Intro|    isolate itself from matter and sense, and to assert its independence
101 Intro|  quiescent: (2) feeling, or inner sense, when the mind is just awakening: (
102 Intro|         memory, which is decaying sense, and from time to time,
103 Intro|      brought nearer to the common sense of mankind. There are some
104 Intro|        study of mind in a special sense, it may also be said that
105 Intro|  Knowledge, Internal and External Sense; these, in the language
106 Intro|           mind, or any process of sense from its mental antecedent,
107 Intro|         world around him,—in what sense and within what limits can
108 Intro|       outward, time of the inward sense. He regards them as parts
109 Intro|         or person.~d. Nearest the sense in the scale of the intellectual
110 Intro| perceptible: it may be the living sense that our thoughts, actions,
111 Intro|         of association is that of sense. When we see or hear separately
112 Intro|         nearest, not to earth and sense, but to heaven and God,
113 Intro|           not a whole in the same sense in which Chemistry, Physiology,
114 Intro|           in the neutral or lower sense. It should assert consistently
115  Thea|         number, having two forms, sense and the object of sense,
116  Thea|           sense and the object of sense, which are ever breaking
117  Thea|            smelling; there is the sense of heat, cold, pleasure,
118  Thea|           to place. Apply this to sense:—When the eye and the appropriate
119  Thea|        doubt about the reality of sense is easily raised, since
120  Thea|     THEAETETUS: Yes, in a certain sense.~SOCRATES: None of that,
121  Thea|         or bid you answer in what sense you know, but only whether
122  Thea|        took up the position, that sense is knowledge, he would have
123  Thea|       them we perceive objects of sense.~THEAETETUS: I agree with
124  Thea|         are applied to objects of sense; and you mean to ask, through
125  Thea|          these, unlike objects of sense, have no separate organ,
126  Thea|         consist in impressions of sense, but in reasoning about
127  Thea|        impression coinciding with sense, is something else which
128  Thea|        impression coinciding with sense;—this last case, if possible,
129  Thea|          memorial coinciding with sense, is something else which
130  Thea|          seals and impressions of sense meet straight and opposite—
131  Thea|          confusion of thought and sense, for in that case we could
132  Thea|            have’ knowledge in the sense of which I am speaking?
133  Thea|           might say of him in one sense, that he always has them
134  Thea|     SOCRATES: And yet, in another sense, he has none of them; but