Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
Alphabetical [« »] proprietors 2 prospect 1 prostatteis 1 protagoras 103 protagorean 7 protagoreans 1 protect 1 | Frequency [« »] 113 were 111 cannot 107 does 103 protagoras 102 see 101 how 101 own | Plato Theaetetus IntraText - Concordances protagoras |
Dialogue
1 Intro| and perhaps even with the Protagoras and the Laches.~But when 2 Intro| the friend and disciple of Protagoras, but he is very reluctant 3 Intro| advanced in years, of the Protagoras and Symposium; he is still 4 Intro| traced the connexion of Protagoras and Heracleitus, or have 5 Intro| for the adversaries of Protagoras are as good a measure as 6 Intro| tumbling to pieces. Nor can Protagoras himself maintain that one 7 Intro| account of the theory of Protagoras; and he is also uncertain ( 8 Intro| to be decided: (a) Would Protagoras have identified his own 9 Intro| instant? Of the work of Protagoras on ‘Truth’ we know nothing, 10 Intro| evidence of the tenets of Protagoras, or of the sense in which 11 Intro| Metaphysics, have mixed up the Protagoras of Plato, as they have the 12 Intro| Plato had ‘The Truth’ of Protagoras before him, and frequently 13 Intro| between the doctrines of Protagoras and Heracleitus was not 14 Intro| acknowledge (so Cratylus). And Protagoras, in the speech attributed 15 Intro| could have misrepresented Protagoras without violating the laws 16 Intro| follows of the thesis of Protagoras, we are criticizing the 17 Intro| we are criticizing the Protagoras of Plato, and not attempting 18 Intro| readers who do not side with Protagoras, rather than with Socrates, 19 Intro| great part of the answer of Protagoras is just and sound; remarks 20 Intro| and his own criticism of Protagoras.~The difficulty seems to 21 Intro| divided, as in the Laches and Protagoras, and the interest of the 22 Intro| That is the theory of Protagoras, who has another way of 23 Intro| other cold. How is this? Protagoras will reply that the wind 24 Intro| been the doctrine, not of Protagoras only, but of all philosophers, 25 Intro| and, as the followers of Protagoras remark, endless contradictions 26 Intro| you not say?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘But Protagoras will retort: “Can anything 27 Intro| on which the doctrine of Protagoras is based?’ ‘No.’ ‘Then I 28 Intro| against this doctrine of Protagoras. For there are states, such 29 Intro| will now state the answer. Protagoras would deny the continuity 30 Intro| only. And therefore, as Protagoras says, “To myself I am the 31 Intro| amazes me in your friend Protagoras?’~‘What may that be?’~‘I 32 Intro| true, then what need of Protagoras to be our instructor at 33 Intro| is an enormous folly, if Protagoras’ “Truth” be indeed truth, 34 Intro| is unjust to his master, Protagoras; but he is too old and stiff 35 Intro| takes up the defence of Protagoras, who is supposed to reply 36 Intro| crowing too soon; and if Protagoras, “the father of the myth,” 37 Intro| paid for your release.~But Protagoras has not yet made his defence; 38 Intro| but did you observe that Protagoras bade me be serious, and 39 Intro| desirous of doing justice to Protagoras, he insists on citing his 40 Intro| others foolish. How will Protagoras answer this argument? For 41 Intro| not and do not agree in Protagoras’ own thesis that ‘Man is 42 Intro| that all mankind, including Protagoras himself, will deny that 43 Intro| the truth. But if the old Protagoras could only pop his head 44 Intro| of men. Admitting, with Protagoras, that immediate sensations 45 Intro| thorough-going followers of Protagoras,—that right and wrong, holy 46 Intro| such as they appear, still Protagoras will not venture to maintain 47 Intro| liable to mistake. Now, would Protagoras maintain that man is the 48 Intro| which is in preparation, or Protagoras of the probable effect of 49 Intro| speaks ‘ad hominen.’ For Protagoras would never have amassed 50 Intro| doctrine of Theaetetus and Protagoras, by asserting further that 51 Intro| The interpretation which Protagoras himself is supposed to give 52 Intro| has to be cleared up. Did Protagoras merely mean to assert the 53 Intro| contained in the thesis of Protagoras. Probably he had no intention 54 Intro| Plato appears to treat Protagoras much as he himself is treated 55 Intro| advanced logic. To which Protagoras is supposed to reply by 56 Intro| immediate knowledge to which Protagoras applies the term. Theodorus 57 Intro| going beyond the truth; and Protagoras has equally right on his 58 Intro| ways.’~III. The theory of Protagoras is connected by Aristotle 59 Intro| connexion was admitted by Protagoras himself. His metaphysical 60 Intro| be described. Of course Protagoras would not have admitted 61 Intro| the right direction, when Protagoras said that ‘Man is the measure 62 Intro| doctrine attributed by Plato to Protagoras, that the mind is only a 63 Intro| themselves. We may say with Protagoras and Hume that what is appears, 64 Intro| conception of knowledge. It is Protagoras who is seeking to adapt 65 Intro| moments, which would say, with Protagoras, that the man is not the 66 Thea| is indeed the opinion of Protagoras, who has another way of 67 Thea| or are we to say, with Protagoras, that the wind is cold to 68 Thea| what an almighty wise man Protagoras must have been! He spoke 69 Thea| In allusion to a book of Protagoras’ which bore this title.) 70 Thea| Summon all philosophers— Protagoras, Heracleitus, Empedocles, 71 Thea| wonderful contradictions, as Protagoras and all who take his line 72 Thea| Well, then, suppose that Protagoras or some one asks whether 73 Thea| hypothesis which we attribute to Protagoras?~THEAETETUS: Not as yet.~ 74 Thea| from my own being; and, as Protagoras says, to myself I am judge 75 Thea| or with the great sage Protagoras, that man is the measure 76 Thea| me in your acquaintance Protagoras?~THEODORUS: What is it?~ 77 Thea| why, my friend, should Protagoras be preferred to the place 78 Thea| this must be the case if Protagoras’ Truth is the real truth, 79 Thea| would assume the measure of Protagoras to apply to the gods as 80 Thea| influenced by popular arguments. Protagoras, or some one speaking on 81 Thea| would have been different if Protagoras, who was the father of the 82 Thea| Well, you ask, and how will Protagoras reinforce his position? 83 Thea| I hope that you observed Protagoras bidding us be serious, as 84 Thea| blaming and taking offence at Protagoras on the ground that he assumed 85 Thea| Very true.~SOCRATES: Had Protagoras been living and answered 86 Thea| SOCRATES: And are not we, Protagoras, uttering the opinion of 87 Thea| Exactly.~SOCRATES: How then, Protagoras, would you have us treat 88 Thea| or any other follower of Protagoras, would contend that no one 89 Thea| SOCRATES: And how about Protagoras himself? If neither he nor 90 Thea| that the truth of which Protagoras wrote would be true to no 91 Thea| mankind, beginning with Protagoras, will contend, or rather, 92 Thea| adversary has a true opinion—Protagoras, I say, will himself allow 93 Thea| SOCRATES: And the truth of Protagoras being doubted by all, will 94 Thea| indicating on behalf of Protagoras, viz. that most things, 95 Thea| still the followers of Protagoras will not deny that in determining 96 Thea| altogether go along with Protagoras. Here arises a new question, 97 Thea| Suppose now, that we ask Protagoras, or one of his disciples, 98 Thea| disciples, a question:—O, Protagoras, we will say to him, Man 99 Thea| you extend your doctrine, Protagoras (as we shall further say), 100 Thea| future?—nay, would not you, Protagoras, better guess which arguments 101 Thea| honour which the advocate of Protagoras was just now forcing upon 102 Thea| nearer, as the advocate of Protagoras desires; and give the truth 103 Thea| argument about the doctrine of Protagoras has been completed, I am