Dialogue

 1 Intro|         after or before what, in the language of Thrasyllus, may be called
 2 Intro|             or Protagorean theory of language is opposed to that which
 3 Intro|          resemblances in thought and language. The Parmenides, again,
 4 Intro|              each moment. (In modern language, the act of sensation is
 5 Intro|            is not quite correct, for language fails in the attempt to
 6 Intro|            There are certain laws of language and logic to which we are
 7 Intro|              fallacies in the use of language or erroneous inferences.
 8 Intro|        rooted themselves for ever in language. It may or may not be a ‘
 9 Intro| generalization of all, without which language would be impossible. And
10 Intro|         thought are inseparable from language, although mere expression
11 Intro|         sounds of words in a foreign language, and understanding the meaning
12 Intro|            have found their way into language, and we with difficulty
13 Intro|              is too deeply rooted in language to be got rid of, but it
14 Intro|            us by the distinctions of language.~A profusion of words and
15 Intro|              hardly distinguished in language from bodily ones. To see
16 Intro|        receives an illusive aid from language; and both in philosophy
17 Intro|              idols of philosophy and language were stripped off, the perception
18 Intro|            might be described in the language of ancient philosophy, as ‘
19 Intro|         without regard to history or language or the social nature of
20 Intro|            through religion, through language, through abstractions, why
21 Intro|            be truly described in the language of Hobbes, as ‘decaying
22 Intro|               of the human race. And language, which is the great educator
23 Intro|       wanting in them; whereas in us language is ever present—even in
24 Intro|            growth in man a growth of language must be supposed. The child
25 Intro|             together are everything. Language, like number, is intermediate
26 Intro|           natural instrumentality of language, and the mind learns to
27 Intro|              in the other. This is a language of ‘large and small letters’ (
28 Intro|             always being educated by language, habit, and the teaching
29 Intro|            in an age when nature and language really seemed to be full
30 Intro|          They are veiled in graceful language; they are not pushed to
31 Intro|              as are inseparable from language and popular opinion. It
32 Intro|              It begins to assume the language and claim the authority
33 Intro|    phraseology for the common use of language, being neither able to win
34 Intro|          takes the form and uses the language of inductive philosophy.
35 Intro|    inveterate errors familiarized by language, yet it may have fallen
36 Intro|        science may be called, in the language of ancient philosophy, ‘
37 Intro|             While acknowledging that language has been the greatest factor
38 Intro|         seeking to frame a technical language, we should vary our forms
39 Intro|       Psychology is inseparable from language, and early language contains
40 Intro|             from language, and early language contains the first impressions
41 Intro|           appetites and create a new language in which they too find expression.
42 Intro|              colour from the popular language of the time. The mind is
43 Intro|              human race, embodied in language, acknowledged by experience,
44 Intro|              be at war with ordinary language and untrue to our own consciousness.
45 Intro|             which is found in common language is in some degree verified
46 Intro|          correspond to facts. Common language represents the mind from
47 Intro|         always changing. The veil of language intercepts facts. Hence
48 Intro|               The false influence of language. We are apt to suppose that
49 Intro|        External Sense; these, in the language of Plato, ‘we shamelessly
50 Intro|            both in the common use of language and in fact, they transform
51 Intro|              circumstances, the very language which it uses being the
52 Intro|     different from ignorance. Of the language learnt in childhood not
53 Intro|       through the slippery nature of language we should pass imperceptibly
54 Intro|               to the first growth of language and philosophy, and to the
55 Intro|            individual. The nature of language, though not the whole, is
56 Intro|            of others. The history of language, of philosophy, and religion,
57  Thea|              name to be used, in the language of nature all things are
58  Thea|          learned, we do not hear the language of foreigners when they
59  Thea|            for the all.’~This is the language of Parmenides, Melissus,
60  Thea|       themselves, and must get a new language. I know of no word that
61  Thea|             and awful, as in Homeric language he may be called;—him I