Dialogue

 1 Intro|         defending him.’~Theodorus objects that Callias is the true
 2 Intro|       mind is apt to suppose that objects exist independently of the
 3 Intro|         relation or adaptation of objects to the mind to be different
 4 Intro|     distinguish not only external objects, but objects of will and
 5 Intro|        only external objects, but objects of will and of knowledge
 6 Intro|         the fleetings of sensible objects, ideas alone seemed to be
 7 Intro|     points appeared to be outward objects. Any pretence of knowledge
 8 Intro|         the perception of outward objects alone remained. The ancient
 9 Intro|           a conception of outward objects apart from the mind, or
10 Intro|        mind apart from them. Soon objects of sense were merged in
11 Intro|      except in so far as they are objects of sense themselves.~Physiology
12 Intro|           of the mind; it implies objects of sense, and objects of
13 Intro|     implies objects of sense, and objects of sense have differences
14 Intro|    without the mind.~But prior to objects of sense there is a third
15 Intro| philosophy, as ‘the Not-being’ of objects. It is a negative idea which
16 Intro|        only become conscious when objects are withdrawn from it. There
17 Intro|         of matter as divided into objects; or of objects again as
18 Intro|       divided into objects; or of objects again as formed by abstraction
19 Intro|           cannot think of outward objects of sense or of outward sensations
20 Intro|      space is the void of outward objects, and we can no more imagine
21 Intro|          implies some relation of objects to one another, some position
22 Intro|         seeing another, different objects hang together in recollection,
23 Intro|          the individual object or objects, and is always attaching
24 Intro|           connexion of ideas with objects or with one another. And
25 Intro|        the impression of external objects present with us or just
26 Intro|        dimmer conception of other objects which have disappeared from
27 Intro|           like the association of objects in a landscape. Just as
28 Intro|         their relation to outward objects:—~1. The senses are not
29 Intro|        The most cursory glance at objects enables the experienced
30 Intro|      which are a long way off are objects of a like nature with those
31 Intro|         and its relation to other objects. But we are already passing
32 Intro|           of the mind to external objects, is really a trifling one,
33 Intro|            with Berkeley, resolve objects of sense into sensations;
34 Intro|       further, and deny, not only objects of sense, but the continuity
35 Intro|          of ourselves and outward objects. But when we attempt to
36 Intro|            the terms of a series, objects lying near, words having
37  Thea|        rest of the senses and the objects akin to them. Do you see,
38  Thea|           is true of all sensible objects, hard, warm, and the like,
39  Thea|     generate sensations and their objects, the one becomes a thing
40  Thea|          through them we perceive objects of sense.~THEAETETUS: I
41  Thea|     perceive through another; the objects of hearing, for example,
42  Thea|   perceived through sight, or the objects of sight through hearing?~
43  Thea|    discerns, not only in sensible objects, but in all things, universal
44  Thea|      numbers which are applied to objects of sense; and you mean to
45  Thea|     notion is, that these, unlike objects of sense, have no separate
46  Thea|         conception either of both objects or of one of them?~THEAETETUS:
47  Thea|      speaking and thinking of two objects, and apprehending them both
48  Thea|       both or only one of the two objects in his mind can think that
49  Thea|       slow in assigning the right objects to the right impressions—
50  Thea|    deceived in their knowledge of objects, and ignorant.~THEAETETUS:
51  Thea|      elements or letters are only objects of perception, and cannot