Dialogue

 1 Intro|            great geometrician, whose science is thus indicated to be
 2 Intro|         throwing down definitions of science and knowledge. Proceeding
 3 Intro|             the meaning of the word ‘science’ could scarcely be explained
 4 Intro|             to attain distinction in science. ‘Yes, Socrates, there is
 5 Intro|               but, as he is a man of science, he may be a judge of our
 6 Intro|             suppose a hunt after the science of odd and even, or some
 7 Intro|              and even, or some other science. The possession of the birds
 8 Intro|             inductive portion of any science may be small, as in mathematics
 9 Intro|             a sort of nominalism ‘La science est une langue bien faite.’
10 Intro|       another, could be framed until science obtained a content. The
11 Intro|              age of Plato thought of science only as pure abstraction,
12 Intro|              than enlightened mental science. It is hard to say how many
13 Intro|           the hymn of dialectic, the science of relations, of ideas,
14 Intro|           sense are reconstructed in science. They and not the mere impressions
15 Intro|          branches of knowledge; when science is able to apply her tests,
16 Intro|      exercised over them by physical science. But any interpretation
17 Intro| interpretation of nature by physical science is far in advance of such
18 Intro|            the daylight of inductive science.~The attractiveness of such
19 Intro|             claim the authority of a science; but it is only an hypothesis
20 Intro|            false analogy of Physical Science and has great expectations
21 Intro|      conditions of this very inexact science, and we shall only know
22 Intro|           fact therefore that such a science exists and is popular, affords
23 Intro|            down to us. The imaginary science may be called, in the language
24 Intro|         Psychology the position of a science at all; it cannot, like
25 Intro|       although they can never become science in the ordinary sense of
26 Intro|            the character of an exact science. We cannot say that words
27 Intro|              elements from which the science or study of the mind proceeds.
28 Intro|             be said that there is no science which does not contribute
29 Intro|      knowledge of it. The methods of science and their analogies are
30 Intro|          claim to the authority of a science, has called attention to
31 Intro|         pains to analyze them.’~e. A science such as Psychology is not
32 Intro|           extent, not as a branch of science, but as a collection of
33 Intro|    Metaphysic. It is a fragment of a science only, which in all probability
34 Intro|          influence of the body. Both science and poetry are made up of
35 Intro|         philosophy, and to the whole science of man. There can be no
36  Thea|        cobbling, you mean the art or science of making shoes?~THEAETETUS:
37  Thea|            he who does not know what science or knowledge is, has no
38  Thea|              knowledge of the art or science of making shoes?~THEAETETUS:
39  Thea|           SOCRATES: Nor of any other science?~THEAETETUS: No.~SOCRATES:
40  Thea|             when a man is asked what science or knowledge is, to give
41  Thea|              the name of some art or science is ridiculous; for the question
42  Thea|       SOCRATES: And therefore not in science or knowledge?~THEAETETUS:
43  Thea|             the same as knowledge or science?~THEAETETUS: Clearly not,
44  Thea|             and ‘we have or have not science or knowledge,’ as if we
45  Thea|             deprived of knowledge or science.~THEAETETUS: But if you
46  Thea|             form of a hunt after the science of odd and even in general.~
47  Thea|              numbers, for he has the science of all numbers in his mind?~