Dialogue

 1 Intro|         to transfer them from the object to the subject. The Megarians,
 2 Intro|          words for ‘subject’ and ‘object,’ and no distinct conception
 3 Intro|        ever in motion between the object and the eye, and varying
 4 Intro|           two forms—sense and the object of sense— which come to
 5 Intro|           eye and the appropriate object come together, and give
 6 Intro|         but a seeing eye, and the object is filled with whiteness,
 7 Intro|       wine. Neither can I and the object of sense become separately
 8 Intro|         analysis into subject and object.) My sensation alone is
 9 Intro|        seal or stamp on the wrong object: or 2ndly, when knowing
10 Intro|   identify the impression and the object. But there could be no error
11 Intro|         mind was passing from the object to the subject. The same
12 Intro|          other, of the eye to the object of sense, of the mind to
13 Intro|         which is ourselves, of an object which is all the rest. These
14 Intro|          comprehended in a higher object, which reunites with the
15 Intro|          mist. It wavered between object and subject, passing imperceptibly
16 Intro|         Appearance in the outward object was for a time indistinguishable
17 Intro|          But the conception of an object without us, or the power
18 Intro|           determined. The distant object, the undefined notion, come
19 Intro|    inseparably bound together—the object would be nowhere and nothing,
20 Intro|           less extension from one object, which is perceived directly,
21 Intro|       various associations of the object which are latent in the
22 Intro|         them. If, after seeing an object we shut our eyes, the object
23 Intro|      object we shut our eyes, the object remains dimly seen in the
24 Intro|       compared to the sight of an object at a great distance which
25 Intro|          remembers the individual object or objects, and is always
26 Intro| observation of the same recurring object is associated with the feeble
27 Intro|           utter the name when the object is no longer there, but
28 Intro|         indistinct picture of the object which accompanies it. But
29 Intro|           is reversed—the outward object fades away into nothingness,
30 Intro|           the sight of an outward object. There is a natural connexion
31 Intro|          form, the distance of an object and its relation to other
32 Intro|          it differ as subject and object in the same manner? Can
33  Thea|          two forms, sense and the object of sense, which are ever
34  Thea|        them; each has its kindred object,—each variety of colour
35  Thea|           eye and the appropriate object meet together and give birth
36  Thea|       whiteness proceeds from the object which combines in producing
37  Thea|         but a seeing eye; and the object which combined to form the
38  Thea|          or stone or whatever the object may be which happens to
39  Thea|       SOCRATES: There is no other object of which I shall ever have
40  Thea|           perception, for another object would give another perception,
41  Thea|           different; nor can that object which affects me, meeting
42  Thea|           this sensation, nor the object by itself, this quality.~
43  Thea|           perceiving nothing; the object, whether it become sweet,
44  Thea|           intelligent person will object, quite the reverse. But
45  Thea|         we are using the word the object is escaping in the flux?~
46  Thea|       mind, and say that one real object is another real object.
47  Thea|       real object is another real object. For thus he always thinks