Dialogue

 1 Intro|  Heracleitus. The relativeness of sensation is then developed at length,
 2 Intro|          principle which is above sensation, and which resides in the
 3 Intro|      asserted the absoluteness of sensation at each instant? Of the
 4 Intro|          that the absoluteness of sensation at each instant was to be
 5 Intro|        birth to whiteness and the sensation of whiteness; the eye is
 6 Intro|     produced the same effect. All sensation is to be resolved into a
 7 Intro|       modern language, the act of sensation is really indivisible, though
 8 Intro|           subject and object.) My sensation alone is true, and true
 9 Intro|           other monster which has sensation, is a measure of all things;
10 Intro|       whiteness, nor any sense or sensation, can be predicated of anything,
11 Intro|           knowledge is and is not sensation; and of everything we must
12 Intro|          The simplest of these is sensation, or sensible perception,
13 Intro|      Plato, denied the reality of sensation. And in the ancient as well
14 Intro|           which the philosophy of sensation presented great attraction
15 Intro|     saying that ‘All knowledge is sensation’ is identified by Plato
16 Intro|   existence both of knowledge and sensation. But I am not responsible
17 Intro|          but united in any act of sensation, reflection, or volition.
18 Intro|       history and experience. But sensation is of the present only,
19 Intro|           any other point of view sensation is of all mental acts the
20 Intro|        the Theaetetus, to analyse sensation, and secondly to trace the
21 Intro|     connexion between theories of sensation and a sensational or Epicurean
22 Intro|       consider them.~The simplest sensation involves an unconscious
23 Intro|           but by the mind. A mere sensation does not attain to distinctness:
24 Intro|      added to the matter given in sensation,’ we should consider that
25 Intro|        the a priori conditions of sensation we may proceed to consider
26 Intro|   extension of them. The simplest sensation implies some relation of
27 Intro|          a previous or subsequent sensation. The acts of seeing and
28 Intro|        the closed eye—between the sensation and the recollection of
29 Intro|        experience or observation. Sensation, like all other mental processes,
30 Intro|        what we see or feel is our sensation only: for a day or two the
31 Intro|        doctrine that knowledge is sensation, in ancient times, or of
32 Intro| maintaining that all knowledge is sensation; the other basing the virtues
33 Intro|           knowledge is reduced to sensation, so virtue is reduced to
34 Intro|      theory that all knowledge is sensation is allied to the lower rather
35 Intro|           interior of thought and sensation is examined. But the individual
36 Intro|     natural states or stages:—(1) sensation, in which it is almost latent
37 Intro|        the external stimulus to a sensation from the activity of the
38  Thea|        birth to whiteness and the sensation connatural with it, which
39  Thea|      another result; which is the sensation of bitterness in the tongue,
40  Thea|        can I by myself, have this sensation, nor the object by itself,
41  Thea|        stranger monster which has sensation, is the measure of all things;
42  Thea|      effect? For if truth is only sensation, and no man can discern
43  Thea|    consider whether knowledge and sensation are the same or different,
44  Thea|         against the corresponding sensation; like a bad archer, I miss
45  Thea|  Theaetetus, knowledge is neither sensation nor true opinion, nor yet