Dialogue

 1 Intro|          and therefore he is no judge of our faces; but, as he
 2 Intro|         of science, he may be a judge of our intellects. And if
 3 Intro|       says, “To myself I am the judge of what is and what is not.”
 4 Intro|        and every man is his own judge, and everything that he
 5 Intro|       which implies that men do judge of one another’s impressions,
 6 Intro|      not our master. Who is the judge or where is the spectator,
 7 Intro|      not a vine-grower a better judge of a vintage which is not
 8 Intro|      fortune if every man could judge of the future for himself.
 9 Intro|     only persuade them, and the judge may form a true opinion
10 Intro|        a true opinion and truly judge. But if true opinion were
11 Intro|      rhetorician cannot put the judge or juror in possession of
12 Intro|  enables the experienced eye to judge approximately of their relations
13  Thea| Protagoras says, to myself I am judge of what is and what is not
14  Thea|          is to himself the sole judge, and everything that he
15  Thea|   judgment of yours, or that we judge you always to have a true
16  Thea|       opinion, deeming that you judge falsely?~THEODORUS: Yes,
17  Thea|         our leisure. Who is our judge? Or where is the spectator
18  Thea|       all such things he is the judge; for he has the criterion
19  Thea|       not mistaken, is a better judge of the sweetness or dryness
20  Thea|       the cook will be a better judge than the guest, who is not
21  Thea|     will be to himself the best judge of the pleasure which will
22  Thea|    other man was better able to judge what will be and seem to
23  Thea|        opinion about them, they judge without knowledge, and yet
24  Thea|       are the same, the perfect judge could not have judged rightly