Dialogue

 1 Intro|       the Theaetetus; (2) the theory of rest, which Socrates
 2 Intro| overturning every conceivable theory of knowledge.~The direct
 3 Intro|    Sophistical or Protagorean theory of language is opposed to
 4 Intro|  Socrates is conducted from a theory of sense to a theory of
 5 Intro|   from a theory of sense to a theory of ideas.~There is no reason
 6 Intro|    similitude of the Socratic theory of education (compare Republic,
 7 Intro|  trust Plato’s account of the theory of Protagoras; and he is
 8 Intro|     reconstruct out of them a theory of knowledge. The time at
 9 Intro|      The time at which such a theory could be framed had not
10 Intro| before Christ was not another theory of rest or motion, or Being
11 Intro|     perception.’ ‘That is the theory of Protagoras, who has another
12 Intro|    which is contrary to their theory. And did we not say, that
13 Intro|     are conscious or not.~The theory that ‘Knowledge is sensible
14 Intro|     there were reactions from theory to experience, from ideas
15 Intro|     manner of ways.’~III. The theory of Protagoras is connected
16 Intro|   which is not covered by his theory, viz. errors in arithmetic.
17 Intro|    with another and different theory, of those who assert that
18 Intro|      to the question, Why the theory that all knowledge is sensation
19  Thea|  these cases the esse-percipi theory appears to be unmistakably
20  Thea| universal flux a ring: is the theory sound or not? at any rate,
21  Thea|    leave the details of their theory unexamined, but we must
22  Thea|      first; and thus the fine theory has again taken wings and
23  Thea|   betray a great and imposing theory.~THEAETETUS: No, indeed.~