Dialogue

 1 Intro|           our own opinion against ancient and famous men.~Let us first
 2 Intro|          of sensation. And in the ancient as well as the modern world
 3 Intro|           great attraction to the ancient thinker. Amid the conflict
 4 Intro|         link of connexion between ancient and modern philosophy. The
 5 Intro|           the modern historian of ancient philosophy might perceive
 6 Intro|          the simple elements. But ancient philosophy in this, as in
 7 Intro|           obtained a content. The ancient philosophers in the age
 8 Intro|           an interesting phase of ancient philosophy has passed before
 9 Intro|           is a difference between ancient and modern psychology, and
10 Intro|         are contained in them.~In ancient philosophies the analysis
11 Intro|       objects alone remained. The ancient Epicureans never asked whether
12 Intro| experience forms an alliance with ancient scepticism.~The higher truths
13 Intro|           metaphorically, both in ancient and modern philosophy, to
14 Intro|      described in the language of ancient philosophy, as ‘the Not-being’
15 Intro|        the ‘beggarly elements’ of ancient scepticism, and acknowledge
16 Intro|           among us, not, like the ancient scepticism, in an age when
17 Intro|        knowledge is sensation, in ancient times, or of sensationalism
18 Intro|          nor can we deny that the ancient Stoics were materialists,
19 Intro|         such thinkers, whether in ancient or in modern times, the
20 Intro|    question or is based upon some ancient tradition, especially if
21 Intro|        called, in the language of ancient philosophy, ‘a shadow of
22  Thea|     opinion and rejecting that of ancient and famous men. O Theodorus,