Dialogue

 1 Intro|        And Protagoras, in the speech attributed to him, never
 2 Intro|      the probable effect of a speech than an ordinary person?
 3 Intro|   difficulty under figures of speech, but these, although telling
 4 Intro|      reflection of thought in speech—a sort of nominalism ‘La
 5 Intro|     he thinks; therefore mere speech cannot be knowledge. And
 6 Intro| flavouring a sauce or fawning speech’; or the remarkable expression, ‘
 7 Intro|    from them. Mere figures of speech have unconsciously influenced
 8 Intro|    mind’s eye, are figures of speech transferred from one to
 9 Intro|     This is another figure of speech, which might be appropriately
10 Intro|    from the active faculty of speech: they receive impressions,
11 Intro|     differences of articulate speech and of musical notes? Yet
12 Intro|       Yet how small a part of speech or of music is produced
13 Intro|      of our ordinary modes of speech is disturbing to the mind.
14 Intro|      should vary our forms of speech, lest they should degenerate
15 Intro|      be made about figures of speech. They fill up the vacancy
16 Intro|    into use, and the river of speech finds out the dried-up channel.~
17  Thea|       banish from writing and speech, or you talk about the reason
18  Thea|    probability and figures of speech in matters of such importance.
19  Thea| flavouring a sauce or fawning speech; the other character is
20  Thea|     expression of the mind in speech; the second, which has just