Dialogue

 1 Intro|          we first get rid of the confusion of the idea of knowledge
 2 Intro|   specific kinds of knowledge,—a confusion which has been already noticed
 3 Intro|        contrast of opinions. The confusion caused by the irony of Socrates,
 4 Intro|     mental progress are times of confusion; we only see, or rather
 5 Intro|         there is a corresponding confusion and want of retentiveness;
 6 Intro|     ignorance. Error, then, is a confusion of thought and sense.~Theaetetus
 7 Intro|         errors where there is no confusion of mind and sense? e.g.
 8 Intro|       make no progress.~All this confusion arises out of our attempt
 9 Intro| explained by Plato at first as a confusion of mind and sense, which
10 Intro|       kept altogether clear of a confusion, which the analogous word
11 Intro|       definition? And is not the confusion increased by the use of
12 Intro|         light and order into the confusion. At what point confusion
13 Intro|         confusion. At what point confusion becomes distinctness is
14 Intro|  conceptions there seems to be a confusion of the individual and the
15 Intro|          by such a resolution or confusion of them. For we have not
16  Thea|         lay the blame of his own confusion and perplexity on himself,
17  Thea|    retain, and are not liable to confusion, but have true thoughts,
18  Thea|         cannot be explained as a confusion of thought and sense, for