Dialogue

 1 Intro|         absence of the doctrine of recollection and of any doctrine of ideas
 2 Intro|            memory has but a feeble recollection of what we were saying or
 3 Intro|            space and partly by the recollection of events which have happened
 4 Intro|           objects hang together in recollection, and when we call for one
 5 Intro|            association. The act of recollection may be compared to the sight
 6 Intro| association of sense. The power of recollection seems to depend on the intensity
 7 Intro|           the first —weaker in the recollection of sensible impressions
 8 Intro|           lightening the labour of recollection.~And now we may suppose
 9 Intro|     disappeared from our immediate recollection and yet continue to exist
10 Intro|      between the sensation and the recollection of it. But this distinction
11 Intro|          us a very little way, for recollection is present in sight as well
12 Intro|          sight as well as sight in recollection. There is no impression
13 Intro|         two principal kinds of it, recollection and recognition,—recollection
14 Intro|      recollection and recognition,—recollection in which forgotten things
15 Intro|           times more powerful than recollection is recognition, perhaps
16 Intro|            call up some thought or recollection either accidentally or naturally