Dialogue

 1 Intro| contemporary history of thought. We know that mysticism is not criticism.
 2 Intro|            of his system. We do not know how Plato would have arranged
 3 Intro|            motion; he would like to know how she behaved in some
 4 Intro|         Critias, whom all Athenians know to be similarly accomplished,
 5 Intro|          were many of them, and you know nothing of that fairest
 6 Intro|            bright, and were made to know and follow the best, and
 7 Intro|             which we suppose men to know, though no one has explained
 8 Intro|             they are; if you do not know, the safest answer is to
 9 Intro|           yearn for enlargement. We know that ‘being’ is only the
10 Intro|        philosophy, that of which we know least has the greatest interest
11 Intro|           tells us that he does not know in what proportions they
12 Intro|             at first they seemed to know all things as in a dream:
13 Intro|           the early Pythagoreans to know how far the statements contained
14 Intro|            a word to the wise). ‘To know or tell the origin of the
15 Timae|             that no one should ever know his own child, but they
16 Timae|          and statesmen, and may not know what they do and say in
17 Timae|            again like children, and know nothing of what happened
18 Timae|          the next place, you do not know that there formerly dwelt
19 Timae|             can scarcely be said to know that their wanderings, being
20 Timae|        visible gods have an end.~To know or tell the origin of the
21 Timae|      discovered thus much, we shall know the true origin of earth