Dialogue

 1 Intro|        a Jewish sense, as they really found the personality of
 2 Intro|        of any words. They were really incapable of distinguishing
 3 Intro| impressions enter in, they are really conquered, though they seem
 4 Intro|     disgraceful, whereas it is really involuntary and arises from
 5 Intro|       neither of them are they really the authors. For the planters
 6 Intro| divided, and there was nothing really irrational in arguing that
 7 Intro|        ancient philosophers is really an anachronism. For they
 8 Intro|      which has no qualities is really a negation. Moreover in
 9 Intro|        that this objective was really a subjective, and involved
10 Intro| creation, in Plato’s sense, is really the creation of order; and
11 Intro|        network of a creel.’ He really means by this what we should
12 Intro|     and the Phaedo. That there really existed in antiquity a work
13 Intro|      connexion between them is really inseparable; for if we attempt
14 Intro|       all the evils of men are really self-inflicted. And here,
15 Intro|     among you hoary with age,’ really a compliment to the Athenians
16 Intro|        Island of Atlantis have really coincided with the struggle
17 Timae|        the form of a myth, but really signifies a declination
18 Timae|        and perishing and never really is. Now everything that
19 Timae|     moved slower although they really overtook them; for the motion
20 Timae|      they seem to conquer, are really conquered.~And by reason