Dialogue

 1 Intro|       in that former cycle, the evil was minimized and the good
 2 Intro|      good was minimized and the evil everywhere diffused, and
 3 Intro|     difference between good and evil is the difference between
 4 Intro|       not this be a still worse evil than the other? ‘Certainly.’
 5 Intro|        half the causes of moral evil are in this way removed; (
 6 Intro|   interest—the consciousness of evil—what in the Jewish Scriptures
 7 Intro|       the knowledge of good and evil.’ At the end of the narrative,
 8 Intro|         words of the Lysis: ‘If evil were to perish, should we
 9 Intro|           As in the Theaetetus, evil is supposed to continue,—
10 Intro|      God causing and permitting evil, and between his more and
11 Intro|         disregard of words. The evil of mere verbal oppositions,
12 Intro|        good, which is almost an evil. The law sacrifices the
13 Intro|   regulation. It may be a great evil that physicians should kill
14 Intro|       it would be a far greater evil if each particular in the
15 State| previous state came elements of evil and unrighteousness, which,
16 State|      nurturing the animals, the evil was small, and great the
17 State|      great was the admixture of evil, and there was a danger
18 State|         not called disease, but evil, or disgrace, or injustice.~
19 State|        has incurred disgrace or evil or injustice at the hands
20 State|        are guilty of numberless evil deeds of the same kind;
21 State|       not this be a still worse evil than the former?~YOUNG SOCRATES:
22 State|        intermediate in good and evil; but the government of the
23 State|         great good or any great evil, when compared with the
24 State|        from the necessity of an evil nature, are violently carried
25 State|        will lastingly unite the evil with one another or with