Dialogue

 1 Intro|  ANALYSIS~In the Phaedrus, the Republic, the Philebus, the Parmenides,
 2 Intro|        made in the Laws to the Republic, we see that the entire
 3 Intro|        is a pattern in heaven (Republic), is here described as a
 4 Intro|      of one another. As in the Republic, the government of philosophers,
 5 Intro|      myth of the Phaedrus, the Republic, the Phaedo, or the Gorgias,
 6 Intro|    between the Timaeus and the Republic. But there is no reason
 7 Intro|       termed by Glaucon in the Republic, and the higher life of
 8 Intro|       in the Symposium and the Republic. And in the Phaedrus this
 9 Intro|      be made kings,’ as in the Republic: he merely holds up the
10 Intro|        laid deep in education (Republic), and at the same time some
11 Intro|       of each other. As in the Republic, Plato has observed that
12 Intro|     many over the few (compare Republic). It has fixed rules which
13 Intro|      stands midway between the Republic and the Laws, and is also
14 Intro|      Timaeus, the ideal of the Republic. A previous chaos in which
15 Intro|     the myth at the end of the Republic, Plato touches on the subject
16 Intro|   never cease from ill’ of the Republic. The point of view in both
17 Intro| connecting links both with the Republic and the Philebus.~More than
18 Intro|      Laws rather than with the Republic, and the Laws had been received,
19 Intro|      stand halfway between the Republic and the Laws, and in near
20 Intro|      such interval between the Republic or Phaedrus and the two
21 State|      way of interest. (Compare Republic.)~STRANGER: Then now, let