Cratylus
   Part
 1 Intro|    which he attempts to realize abstractions, and that they are replaced


Euthydemus
   Part
 2 Intro|    which was once attributed to abstractions is now attached to the words


Meno
   Part
 3 Intro| mythology, at another among the abstractions of mathematics or metaphysics;
 4 Intro|      meaning could be attached. Abstractions such as ‘authority,’ ‘equality,’ ‘


Parmenides
   Part
 5 Intro|       your attempting to define abstractions, such as the good and the
 6 Intro| improved by Plato. When primary abstractions are used in every conceivable


Phaedo
   Part
 7 Intro|        and this, like the other abstractions of Greek philosophy, sank


Phaedrus
   Part
 8 Intro|        seemed to centre. To him abstractions, as we call them, were another


Philebus
   Part
 9 Intro|         of various intermediate abstractions, such as end, good, cause,
10 Intro|        is always tending to see abstractions within abstractions; which,
11 Intro|         see abstractions within abstractions; which, like the ideas in
12 Intro|   return to the poor and meagre abstractions of the Eleatic philosophy.


The Sophist
   Part
13 Intro|    other hand, the discovery of abstractions was the great source of
14 Intro|      each one of the company of abstractions, if we may speak in the
15 Intro|       had got beyond his barren abstractions: they were beginning to
16 Intro|      them into one another? The abstractions of one, other, being, not-being,
17 Intro|   Hegelian concrete or unity of abstractions. In the intervening period
18 Intro|         thought, and to combine abstractions in a higher unity: the ordinary
19 Intro|        relation to one another. Abstractions grow together and again
20 Intro|         becomes entangled among abstractions, and loses hold of facts.
21 Intro|        categories of logic. For abstractions, though combined by him
22 Intro|         the unity of opposites. Abstractions have a great power over
23 Intro|     only when modified by other abstractions do they make an approach
24 Intro|       must be universal? Do all abstractions shine only by the reflected
25 Intro|        reflected light of other abstractions? May they not also find
26 Intro|        slightly considered. All abstractions are supposed by Hegel to
27 Intro|      There is an explanation of abstractions by the phenomena which they
28 Intro|         their relation to other abstractions. If the knowledge of all
29 Intro|         unmeaningness of ‘mere’ abstractions, and above imaginary possibilities,


Theaetetus
   Part
30 Intro|      the Eleatic Being, but all abstractions seemed to be at variance
31 Intro|      the mind from the power of abstractions and alternatives, and show
32 Intro|         also shown that extreme abstractions are self-destructive, and,
33 Intro|     also mathematical and other abstractions, such as sameness and difference,
34 Intro|         most universal of these abstractions. The good and the beautiful
35 Intro|      good and the beautiful are abstractions of another kind, which exist
36 Intro|         subject. A multitude of abstractions are created by the efforts
37 Intro|        clearing away of useless abstractions which we have inherited
38 Intro|       through language, through abstractions, why should we interpose
39 Intro|         single out one of these abstractions to be the a priori condition
40 Intro|      and has gained innumerable abstractions, of which many have had
41 Text |      too soon diverted from the abstractions of dialectic to geometry.


Timaeus
   Part
42 Intro|       time both of sense and of abstractions; his impressions are taken
43 Intro|   effort to realize and connect abstractions, was not understood by them
44 Intro| struggling—the tendency to mere abstractions; not perceiving that pure
45 Intro|        first and most meagre of abstractions; but to some of the ancient
46 Intro|     human mind was peopled with abstractions; a new world was called
47 Intro|         or essence, mere vacant abstractions, but admitted of progress
48 Intro|         reduced to mathematical abstractions. They too conform to the