The Apology
   Part
 1 Intro|      ironical or sceptical. He is arguing ‘ad hominem’ according to
 2 Text |         the person with whom I am arguing, says: Yes, but I do care;


Charmides
   Part
 3 Text |          the height of folly. And arguing in this way they apply their


Cratylus
   Part
 4 Intro|      imaginary wisdom. When he is arguing out of Homer, about the
 5 Intro|     brother of Callias, have been arguing about names; the former
 6 Text |          friend Cratylus has been arguing about names; he says that


Crito
   Part
 7 Intro|         would be no difficulty in arguing that Socrates should have


Euthydemus
   Part
 8 Intro|        taught, and the fallacy of arguing in a circle is exposed in


Euthyphro
   Part
 9 Text |         did you ever hear any one arguing that a murderer or any sort
10 Text |   questions which they are always arguing, especially in courts of


The First Alcibiades
   Part
11 Text |          that I, Socrates, am not arguing or talking with the face


Gorgias
   Part
12 Intro|        the person with whom he is arguing. But he is certain that
13 Text |          that their opponents are arguing from personal feeling only
14 Text |         the person with whom I am arguing; his suffrage I know how
15 Text |           slyly ask of him who is arguing conventionally a question
16 Text |         of Socrates; he is always arguing about little and unworthy
17 Text |          will observe that we are arguing about the way of human life;
18 Text |        the whole time that we are arguing, we are always going round
19 Text |           argue with me, as I was arguing with Polus:—I shall be tried


Laches
   Part
20 Text | inconsistency. And if we had been arguing in a court of law there


Laws
   Book
21 3    |         to wisdom; while you were arguing that the good lawgiver ought
22 10   |       original of all things, and arguing accordingly; or, if he be


Meno
   Part
23 Intro|         did he remark that he was arguing from the necessary imperfection
24 Text |        which I and Meno have been arguing. Look at the matter in your


Philebus
   Part
25 Intro|           pleasure; neither is he arguing that pleasure is the chief
26 Text |          dull minds, but we go on arguing all the same, like the weakest
27 Text |         there not an absurdity in arguing that there is nothing good


Protagoras
   Part
28 Intro|        Dialogue, when Socrates is arguing that ‘pleasure is the only
29 Text |        wisdom. But in this way of arguing you might come to imagine


The Republic
   Book
30 2    |        other; that is a manner of arguing which, coming from them,
31 5    |           side first and begin by arguing against ourselves? in this


The Sophist
   Part
32 Intro|         of things, the fallacy of arguing ‘a dicto secundum,’ and
33 Intro|          discourse, and as he was arguing before that there could


Theaetetus
   Part
34 Intro|         protests against Socrates arguing from the common use of words,
35 Text |        was. But the other mode of arguing, which is practised by the
36 Text |        pleasure we are not as yet arguing; but can we say that every
37 Text |      habit of a man who is always arguing on all sides of a question;


Timaeus
   Part
38 Intro|      nothing really irrational in arguing that the same laws which
39 Text |         more reasonable position. Arguing from probabilities, I am