Charmides
   Part
 1 Text |       consider how monstrous this proposition is, my friend: in any parallel


Cratylus
   Part
 2 Intro|          propositions. If a whole proposition be true or false, then the
 3 Intro|        false, then the parts of a proposition may be true or false, and
 4 Intro|           sort, he is affirming a proposition which has several senses,
 5 Intro|          from the analysis of the proposition, in this respect falling
 6 Text |        sure.~SOCRATES: And a true proposition says that which is, and
 7 Text |        that which is, and a false proposition says that which is not?~
 8 Text |     possible?~SOCRATES: Then in a proposition there is a true and false?~
 9 Text |     Certainly.~SOCRATES: But is a proposition true as a whole only, and
10 Text |           is true.~SOCRATES: Is a proposition resolvable into any part
11 Text |        name is a part of the true proposition?~HERMOGENES: Yes.~SOCRATES:
12 Text |       Zena and Dia; and the whole proposition means that his power of
13 Text |       thus formed out of a single proposition.~HERMOGENES: Indeed, Socrates,
14 Text |     nature of the thing:—has this proposition been sufficiently proven?~


Crito
   Part
15 Text |           say the same of another proposition—that not life, but a good


Euthydemus
   Part
16 Intro|         discuss the nature of the proposition, nor extract hidden truths
17 Text |          that they can refute any proposition whether true or false. Now
18 Text |           at all?~He granted that proposition also.~But when I describe
19 Text |           of ambiguity of term or proposition. The first is when there


Gorgias
   Part
20 Text |          you going to refute this proposition also?~POLUS: A proposition
21 Text |        proposition also?~POLUS: A proposition which is harder of refutation
22 Text |        generally to the universal proposition which I was just now asserting:


Laws
   Book
23 1    |           word, provided that the proposition which has just been granted
24 1    |       reverse?”~Cleinias. In that proposition every one may safely agree.~


Parmenides
   Part
25 Intro|           In the first place, the proposition, that one is not, is clearly
26 Intro|         is clearly opposed to the proposition, that not one is not. The
27 Intro|           subject of any negative proposition implies at once knowledge
28 Intro|     difference. Thus ‘one’ in the proposition—‘The one is not,’ must be
29 Intro|        one is one is an identical proposition, from which we might expect
30 Intro|           an a priori synthetical proposition ‘one is.’~II. In the first
31 Intro|          three or three one, is a proposition which has, perhaps, given
32 Intro|      partly by an analysis of the proposition, partly by development of
33 Text |    participated in being, for the proposition that one is would have been
34 Text |           been identical with the proposition that one is one; but our


Philebus
   Part
35 Intro|          you may affirm this in a proposition to your companion, or make
36 Text |         And would not the general proposition seem to you to hold, that
37 Text |         opinion, has now become a proposition.~PROTARCHUS: Certainly.~


Protagoras
   Part
38 Text |           agree, Socrates, to the proposition that justice is holy and


The Republic
   Book
39 1    |           attempt to contest this proposition also, but finally acquiesced. ~
40 5    |          he said, is a reasonable proposition. But how will they know
41 5    |        sure that you will admit a proposition which I am about to make. ~
42 5    |       about to make. ~What is the proposition? ~That since beauty is the


The Sophist
   Part
43 Intro|        thought, the nature of the proposition, of definition, of generalization,
44 Intro| difficulty in apprehending that a proposition may be false as well as
45 Intro|     simple converse of the famous proposition of Spinoza,—not ‘Omnis determinatio
46 Intro|          a false nor an unmeaning proposition. The reason is that the
47 Intro|       reason is that the negative proposition has really passed into an
48 Intro|            this does not make the proposition ‘Some have not eaten’ any
49 Intro|         self-contradictory, for a proposition implies a distinction between
50 Intro|           term, the second to the proposition, the third to the syllogism.
51 Intro|    connexion is there between the proposition and our ideas of reciprocity,
52 Text |           in like manner, a false proposition will be deemed to be one
53 Text |        other way in which a false proposition can arise.~STRANGER: There
54 Text |      not-being has no part in the proposition, then all things must be


Theaetetus
   Part
55 Intro|  definition. If he has analyzed a proposition or notion, even with the
56 Intro|     knowledge first begins with a proposition.~The elements may be perceived
57 Intro|         be equally expressed in a proposition? The difference between
58 Intro|       logos tends to create, of a proposition and a definition? And is
59 Intro|   syllable, and of the terms to a proposition.~Plato, in the spirit of
60 Intro|        All A = A) is an identical proposition—that is to say, a mere word
61 Intro|           symbol claiming to be a proposition: the two others (Nothing