Cratylus
   Part
 1 Intro|         relation of subject and predicate. Grammar and logic were


Euthydemus
   Part
 2 Intro|          on the one hand, every predicate was affirmed to be true
 3 Intro|      other, it was held that no predicate was true of any subject,


Meno
   Part
 4 Intro|       if we reason strictly, no predicate can be applied.~The question


Parmenides
   Part
 5 Intro|        Cynics, affirmed that no predicate could be asserted of any
 6 Intro|        inferred by altering the predicate into ‘not many.’ Yet, perhaps,
 7 Text |        no difference whether he predicate of one being or not-being,
 8 Text |        different nature, we can predicate nothing of it. But supposing
 9 Text |         must participate in the predicate ‘that,’ and in many others.~


Phaedo
   Part
10 Text |         than Phaedo, do you not predicate of Simmias both greatness


Philebus
   Part
11 Intro|        right to attribute a new predicate (i.e. ‘good’) to pleasures
12 Text |         you apply to them a new predicate, for you say that all pleasant


The Sophist
   Part
13 Intro|    Their meagre minds refuse to predicate anything of anything; they
14 Intro| distinction between subject and predicate, whereas the maxim of identity,
15 Text |   difficulty in seeing that the predicate ‘not-being’ is not applicable
16 Text |   enquire, then, how we come to predicate many names of the same thing.~


The Statesman
   Part
17 Text |          Of all such actions we predicate not courage, but a name


Theaetetus
   Part
18 Intro|     When we assign to them some predicate, they first begin to have
19 Text | self-existent substance or as a predicate of something else? And suppose
20 Text | self-existent substance or as a predicate of something else?~THEAETETUS:
21 Text |      can only name them, but no predicate can be either affirmed or
22 Text |   things measured by number, we predicate at the same time a singular