(...) The Symposium
    Part
501 Text   |            should hear him speak the language which lovers use to their
502 Text   |          them; he clothes himself in language that is like the skin of


Theaetetus
    Part
503 Intro  |         after or before what, in the language of Thrasyllus, may be called
504 Intro  |             or Protagorean theory of language is opposed to that which
505 Intro  |          resemblances in thought and language. The Parmenides, again,
506 Intro  |              each moment. (In modern language, the act of sensation is
507 Intro  |            is not quite correct, for language fails in the attempt to
508 Intro  |            There are certain laws of language and logic to which we are
509 Intro  |              fallacies in the use of language or erroneous inferences.
510 Intro  |        rooted themselves for ever in language. It may or may not be a ‘
511 Intro  | generalization of all, without which language would be impossible. And
512 Intro  |         thought are inseparable from language, although mere expression
513 Intro  |         sounds of words in a foreign language, and understanding the meaning
514 Intro  |            have found their way into language, and we with difficulty
515 Intro  |              is too deeply rooted in language to be got rid of, but it
516 Intro  |            us by the distinctions of language.~A profusion of words and
517 Intro  |              hardly distinguished in language from bodily ones. To see
518 Intro  |        receives an illusive aid from language; and both in philosophy
519 Intro  |              idols of philosophy and language were stripped off, the perception
520 Intro  |            might be described in the language of ancient philosophy, as ‘
521 Intro  |         without regard to history or language or the social nature of
522 Intro  |            through religion, through language, through abstractions, why
523 Intro  |            be truly described in the language of Hobbes, as ‘decaying
524 Intro  |               of the human race. And language, which is the great educator
525 Intro  |       wanting in them; whereas in us language is ever present—even in
526 Intro  |            growth in man a growth of language must be supposed. The child
527 Intro  |             together are everything. Language, like number, is intermediate
528 Intro  |           natural instrumentality of language, and the mind learns to
529 Intro  |              in the other. This is a language of ‘large and small letters’ (
530 Intro  |             always being educated by language, habit, and the teaching
531 Intro  |            in an age when nature and language really seemed to be full
532 Intro  |          They are veiled in graceful language; they are not pushed to
533 Intro  |              as are inseparable from language and popular opinion. It
534 Intro  |              It begins to assume the language and claim the authority
535 Intro  |    phraseology for the common use of language, being neither able to win
536 Intro  |          takes the form and uses the language of inductive philosophy.
537 Intro  |    inveterate errors familiarized by language, yet it may have fallen
538 Intro  |        science may be called, in the language of ancient philosophy, ‘
539 Intro  |             While acknowledging that language has been the greatest factor
540 Intro  |         seeking to frame a technical language, we should vary our forms
541 Intro  |       Psychology is inseparable from language, and early language contains
542 Intro  |             from language, and early language contains the first impressions
543 Intro  |           appetites and create a new language in which they too find expression.
544 Intro  |              colour from the popular language of the time. The mind is
545 Intro  |              human race, embodied in language, acknowledged by experience,
546 Intro  |              be at war with ordinary language and untrue to our own consciousness.
547 Intro  |             which is found in common language is in some degree verified
548 Intro  |          correspond to facts. Common language represents the mind from
549 Intro  |         always changing. The veil of language intercepts facts. Hence
550 Intro  |               The false influence of language. We are apt to suppose that
551 Intro  |        External Sense; these, in the language of Plato, ‘we shamelessly
552 Intro  |            both in the common use of language and in fact, they transform
553 Intro  |              circumstances, the very language which it uses being the
554 Intro  |     different from ignorance. Of the language learnt in childhood not
555 Intro  |       through the slippery nature of language we should pass imperceptibly
556 Intro  |               to the first growth of language and philosophy, and to the
557 Intro  |            individual. The nature of language, though not the whole, is
558 Intro  |            of others. The history of language, of philosophy, and religion,
559 Text   |              name to be used, in the language of nature all things are
560 Text   |          learned, we do not hear the language of foreigners when they
561 Text   |            for the all.’~This is the language of Parmenides, Melissus,
562 Text   |       themselves, and must get a new language. I know of no word that
563 Text   |             and awful, as in Homeric language he may be called;—him I


Timaeus
    Part
564 Intro  |         Greek element of thought and language overlaid and partly reduced
565 Intro  |              with true principles of language; in the Parmenides overthrowing
566 Intro  |            of his servants. Thus the language of philosophy which speaks
567 Intro  |              Platonic dialogues. The language is weighty, abrupt, and
568 Intro  |             of the work the power of language seems to fail him, and the
569 Intro  |            in another, and the Greek language had not as yet been fashioned
570 Intro  |              for the great master of language was speaking on a theme
571 Intro  |            to the mind of Plato than language of a neutral and impersonal
572 Intro  |            other, has over the mind. Language, two, exercised a spell
573 Intro  |             the thinnest; or, in the language of the common logic, the
574 Intro  |              received from poetry or language or unintelligent sense.
575 Intro  |              no tongue can utter—his language, as he himself says, partaking
576 Intro  |        numbers. The vagueness of his language does not allow us to determine
577 Intro  |        expression, or viewed, in the language of Spinoza, ‘sub specie
578 Intro  |            every part. He assumes in language almost unintelligible to
579 Intro  |     generalizations and delusions of language, that physical philosophy
580 Intro  |              other. At any rate, the language of Plato has been the language
581 Intro  |       language of Plato has been the language of natural theology down
582 Intro  |           eye has seen nor any human language can express.~Lastly, there
583 Intro  |      concealed by a judicious use of language, but they cannot be wholly
584 Intro  |             mastered by them; and in language (Sophist) which may be compared
585 Intro  |               He may be said, in the language of modern philosophy, to
586 Intro  |            seas from one country and language to another. It inspired
587 Intro  |         except this uncertain one of language, appears in it. In several
588 Intro  |            writer has simplified the language of Plato, in a few others
589 Text   |           adequately to represent in language. I am aware that the Sophists
590 Text   |           best. Wherefore, using the language of probability, we may say
591 Text   |            express myself in clearer language, and this will be an arduous