The Apology
    Part
  1 Intro|             the teachers of physical science and with the Sophists. But


Charmides
    Part
  2 PreS |           logic, and the progress of science, have in these two respects
  3 PreS |            by an ‘or’—e.g. (Greek), ‘science’ or ‘knowledge,’ (Greek), ‘
  4 PreS |              same opposition between science and religion. Although we
  5 PreS |            physical and metaphysical science; but really unmeaning?~(
  6 Intro|             Critias replies that the science or knowledge of good and
  7 Intro|              regulated by the higher science or knowledge of knowledge.
  8 Intro|          conception of medicine as a science of the whole as well as
  9 Intro|    temperance in which an element of science or knowledge is not included; (
 10 Intro|               whether there can be a science of science, and whether
 11 Intro|            there can be a science of science, and whether the knowledge
 12 Intro|             absolute self-determined science (the claims of which, however,
 13 Intro|      conclusion that there can be no science which is a ‘science of nothing’ (
 14 Intro|            be no science which is a ‘science of nothing’ (Parmen.). (
 15 Intro|               8) The conception of a science of good and evil also first
 16 Intro|           good and truth in a single science. But the time has not yet
 17 Intro|  metaphysical philosophy; and such a science when brought nearer to us
 18 Intro|              declared also to be the science of self-knowledge, or of
 19 Text |     knowledge of anything, must be a science, and a science of something.~
 20 Text |             must be a science, and a science of something.~Yes, he said;
 21 Text |         something.~Yes, he said; the science of itself.~Is not medicine,
 22 Text |            not medicine, I said, the science of health?~True.~And suppose,
 23 Text |              medicine, which is this science of health, I should answer
 24 Text |           architecture, which is the science of building, I should say
 25 Text |             according to you, is the science of itself. Admitting this
 26 Text |              or wisdom, which is the science of itself, effect? Answer
 27 Text |          which is different from the science. I can show you that the
 28 Text |           and of which wisdom is the science?~You are just falling into
 29 Text |        themselves; wisdom alone is a science of other sciences, and of
 30 Text |              that wisdom is the only science which is the science of
 31 Text |            only science which is the science of itself as well as of
 32 Text |              other sciences.~But the science of science, I said, will
 33 Text |         sciences.~But the science of science, I said, will also be the
 34 Text |             I said, will also be the science of the absence of science.~
 35 Text |            science of the absence of science.~Very true, he said.~Then
 36 Text |          that there must be a single science which is wholly a science
 37 Text |            science which is wholly a science of itself and of other sciences,
 38 Text |            that the same is also the science of the absence of science?~
 39 Text |            science of the absence of science?~Yes.~But consider how monstrous
 40 Text |             surely we are assuming a science of this kind, which, having
 41 Text |              no subject-matter, is a science of itself and of the other
 42 Text |            the possibility of such a science; let us rather consider
 43 Text |         quite right.~Well then, this science of which we are speaking
 44 Text |           which we are speaking is a science of something, and is of
 45 Text |           and is of a nature to be a science of something?~Yes.~Just
 46 Text |            is intending to show that science differs from the object
 47 Text |           differs from the object of science, as any other relative differs
 48 Text |          there be such a class, that science which is called wisdom or
 49 Text |              whether there is such a science of science at all; and even
 50 Text |           there is such a science of science at all; and even if there
 51 Text |              also see whether such a science would or would not do us
 52 Text |            temperance or wisdom is a science of science, and also of
 53 Text |            or wisdom is a science of science, and also of the absence
 54 Text |           and also of the absence of science, I will request you to show
 55 Text |             the advantage, of such a science; and then perhaps you may
 56 Text |            assume that there is this science of science; whether the
 57 Text |             there is this science of science; whether the assumption
 58 Text |          will you tell me how such a science enables us to distinguish
 59 Text |            true: for he who has this science or knowledge which knows
 60 Text |           will admit that there is a science of science;—can this do
 61 Text |           that there is a science of science;—can this do more than determine
 62 Text |              is and the other is not science or knowledge?~No, just that.~
 63 Text |           how will this knowledge or science teach him to know what he
 64 Text |            knowledge of knowledge or science of science, ever teach him
 65 Text |              knowledge or science of science, ever teach him that he
 66 Text |           physician knows nothing of science, for this has been assumed
 67 Text |           further, since medicine is science, we must infer that he does
 68 Text |           physician has some kind of science or knowledge; but when he
 69 Text |             or temperance, if only a science of science, and of the absence
 70 Text |     temperance, if only a science of science, and of the absence of science
 71 Text |       science, and of the absence of science or knowledge, will not be
 72 Text |       perceive, I said, that no such science is to be found anywhere.~
 73 Text |             individuals, he sees the science, and this also will better
 74 Text |              the possibility of this science of sciences, and further
 75 Text |            all the sciences, but one science only, that of good and evil.
 76 Text |            beneficially done, if the science of the good be wanting.~
 77 Text |              wanting.~True.~But that science is not wisdom or temperance,
 78 Text |          wisdom or temperance, but a science of human advantage; not
 79 Text |            of human advantage; not a science of other sciences, or of
 80 Text |              assume that wisdom is a science of sciences, and has a sway
 81 Text |            will have this particular science of the good under her control,
 82 Text |            admitted that there was a science of science, although the
 83 Text |          that there was a science of science, although the argument said
 84 Text |          admitted further, that this science knew the works of the other


Cratylus
    Part
 85 Intro|     phraseology beyond the limits of science or of custom, seem to forget
 86 Intro|             Muller, ‘Lectures on the Science of Language;’ Steinthal, ‘
 87 Intro|            so great a part in mental science, were either banished or
 88 Intro|             the dominion of physical science. Even Kant himself thought
 89 Intro|             the mind of man...If the science of Comparative Philology
 90 Intro|      introduced into the world a new science which more than any other
 91 Intro|        certain that this newly-found science will continue to progress
 92 Intro|              dignity of an Inductive Science. And it is not without practical
 93 Intro|             Muller, ‘Lectures on the Science of Language;’ Steinthal, ‘
 94 Text |           fall under the same art or science; and therefore you would


Euthydemus
    Part
 95 Intro|          treatise on logic; for that science originates in the misunderstandings
 96 Intro|              or reduced to an art or science, but scattered up and down
 97 Intro|              imagine that any single science furnishes a principle of
 98 Intro|              need to reopen them. No science should raise problems or
 99 Intro|          literary criticism; (2) the science of language, under which
100 Intro|           should we allow the living science to become confused with
101 Intro|             might certainly be a new science of logic; it would not however
102 Intro|         Inductive philosophy. Such a science might have two legitimate
103 Intro|          gate of approach to logical science,—nothing more. But to pursue
104 Text |        themselves; but the political science ought to make us wise, and
105 Text |      knowledge to us, if that is the science which is likely to do us
106 Text |              knowledge of the art or science of happiness.~CRITO: Indeed,


Euthyphro
    Part
107 Intro|           says Socrates, piety is ‘a science of asking and giving’—asking
108 Intro|             an affair of business, a science of giving and asking, and
109 Intro|        Euthydemus and Io. The kingly science has already appeared in
110 Text |              that they are a sort of science of praying and sacrificing?~
111 Text |          this view, then, piety is a science of asking and giving?~EUTHYPHRO:
112 Text |           that I am a votary of your science, and give my mind to it,


The First Alcibiades
    Part
113 Text |           agree with a man about the science of arms, which she has never


Gorgias
    Part
114 Intro|        conceiving a universal art or science, which admits of application
115 Intro|         sciences. All that they call science is merely the result of


Laches
    Part
116 Text |              a slight one,—that this science will make any man a great
117 Text |              is not one knowledge or science of the past, another of
118 Text |            of all three there is one science only: for example, there
119 Text |            for example, there is one science of medicine which is concerned
120 Text |            past, and future; and one science of husbandry in like manner,
121 Text |            acknowledge that the same science has understanding of the
122 Text |               SOCRATES: And the same science has to do with the same
123 Text |              Then courage is not the science which is concerned with


Laws
    Book
124 9    |            practise medicine without science, were to come upon the gentleman


Lysis
    Part
125 Intro|             real contribution to the science of logic. Some higher truths


Meno
    Part
126 Intro|           far off vision of a single science. And there are no teachers
127 Intro|          cannot be said to be men of science or philosophers, but they
128 Intro|             not theory; art, but not science. This is a true fact of
129 Intro|            well as the higher one of science, in the spirit of one who
130 Intro|      stimulus to the mind. It is the science of sciences, which are also
131 Intro|        through which the kingdoms of science are seen, but at a distance.
132 Intro|          nothing to do with facts of science. On the other hand, the
133 Intro|               and in every sphere of science and human action are tending
134 Intro|        divine from the human, or one science from another, but labours
135 Intro|           the revelation of a single science’ (Symp.), and all things,


Parmenides
    Part
136 Intro|           name nor word nor idea nor science nor perception nor opinion
137 Intro|            will become. And there is science of the one, and opinion
138 Intro|             in the attempt to define science, which after every effort


Phaedo
    Part
139 Intro|            progress of physiological science, without bringing us nearer
140 Intro|           our knowledge? May not the science of physiology transform
141 Intro|      mysterious reference to another science (mathematics?) of generation
142 Text |              may come from them, and science may be based on memory and
143 Text |            the worse, since the same science comprehended both. And I


Phaedrus
    Part
144 Intro|        answering to dialectic or the science of the ideas. Lastly, the
145 Intro|           Once more, has not medical science become a professional routine,
146 Intro|           want of method in physical science, the want of criticism in
147 Text |       congenial soul, by the help of science sows and plants therein


Philebus
    Part
148 Intro|       theoretical; and a dialectical science, which is higher still and
149 Intro|       infinity. With him the idea of science may be said to anticipate
150 Intro|            may be said to anticipate science; at a time when the sciences
151 Intro|            fruitful notion of modern science.~Plato describes with ludicrous
152 Intro|           Republic, not as a sublime science, coordinate with astronomy,
153 Intro|             become a purely abstract science, when separated from matter,
154 Intro|      expressed in the modern formula—science is art theoretical, art
155 Intro|              art theoretical, art is science practical. In the reason
156 Intro|              superiority of the pure science of number over the mixed
157 Intro|              dialectic, which is the science of eternal Being, apprehended
158 Intro|             man is dialectic, or the science of being, which will forget
159 Intro|       attaining. And is not this the science which has a firmer grasp
160 Intro|             between pure and applied science for the first time has a
161 Intro|            whole, or made a separate science or system. Many thinkers
162 Intro|            by Plato (to which modern science has returned in Mill and
163 Text |            Ask me whether wisdom and science and mind, and those other
164 Text |            no difference between one science and another;—would not the
165 Text |            among the votaries of the science; and there may be reasonably
166 Text |     dialectic?~SOCRATES: Clearly the science which has to do with all
167 Text |              able to say whether the science of which I have been speaking
168 Text |          hardly think that any other science or art has a firmer grasp
169 Text |              SOCRATES: Then mind and science when employed about such


Protagoras
    Part
170 Intro|            and public; in short, the science or knowledge of human life.’~
171 Intro|              of rhetoric and the new science of interrogation and argument;
172 Text |        undeniably also be an art and science?~They will agree, he said.~
173 Text |            The nature of that art or science will be a matter of future
174 Text |              the existence of such a science furnishes a demonstrative


The Republic
    Book
175 1    |        reluctance. ~Then, I said, no science or art considers or enjoins
176 3    |           dying hard, by the help of science he struggled on to old age. ~
177 4    |           greater superiority in the science and practise of boxing than
178 4    |              sciences? The object of science is knowledge (assuming that
179 4    |           the object of a particular science is a particular kind of
180 4    |          mean, for example, that the science of house-building is a kind
181 4    |            be disparate, or that the science of health is healthy, or
182 4    |            only that, when the term "science" is no longer used absolutely,
183 4    |              hence called not merely science, but the science of medicine. ~
184 4    |              merely science, but the science of medicine. ~I quite understand,
185 6    |              deem to be the cause of science, and of truth in so far
186 6    |             so in this other sphere, science and truth may be deemed
187 6    |               which is the author of science and truth, and yet surpasses
188 6    |            their several branches of science; these are their hypotheses,
189 6    |       knowledge and being, which the science of dialectic contemplates,
190 7    |      rhythmical, but not giving them science; and the words, whether
191 7    |            must add how charming the science is! and in how many ways
192 7    |          inquire whether the kindred science also concerns us? ~You mean
193 7    |             such a conception of the science is in flat contradiction
194 7    |             real object of the whole science. ~Certainly, he said. ~Then
195 7    |              geometry. Moreover, the science has indirect effects, which
196 7    |               Then assuming that the science now omitted would come into
197 7    |            of that sort is matter of science; his soul is looking downward,
198 7    |             in astronomy. For in the science of harmony, as you probably
199 7    |           convention can ever become science? ~Impossible, he said. ~
200 7    |            principle and is the only science which does away with hypotheses
201 7    |              and less clearness than science: and this, in our previous
202 7    |              call the first division science, the second understanding,
203 7    |       intellect is to opinion, so is science to belief, and understand
204 7    |         given by opinion, and not by science; dreaming and slumbering
205 7    |              set over them; no other science can be placed higher-the


The Second Alcibiades
    Part
206 Pre  |           striking manner the modern science of political economy and


The Sophist
    Part
207 Intro|             in the infancy of mental science, and which was born and
208 Intro|          them together in a separate science. But he is not to be regarded
209 Intro|              logical process. Modern science feels that this, like other
210 Intro|            rendered by him to mental science is the recognition of the
211 Intro|             musician. And there is a science which teaches not only what
212 Intro|            what not. This is a noble science, on which we have stumbled
213 Intro|             to call the imitation of science, and the latter the imitation
214 Intro|             Sophist has no claims to science or knowledge. Now the imitator,
215 Intro|            States.) a superintending science of dialectic. This is the
216 Intro|             passed into an imaginary science of essence, and no longer
217 Intro|              of knowledge. Of such a science, whether described as ‘philosophia
218 Intro|              philosophia prima,’ the science of ousia, logic or metaphysics,
219 Intro|              as yet found the higher science which arrays them in harmonious
220 Intro|             it has a place for every science, and affirms that no philosophy
221 Intro|             cannot say that physical science, which at present occupies
222 Text |               proceed by the help of science in the path of argument?
223 Text |              be sure he will require science, and, if I am not mistaken,
224 Text |              upon our free and noble science, and in looking for the
225 Text |          business of the dialectical science?~THEAETETUS: That is what
226 Text |             that which coexists with science, a scientific or learned


The Statesman
    Part
227 Intro|         objects of equal interest to science (compare Parmen.). There
228 Intro| characteristic is, that he alone has science, which is superior to law
229 Intro|              be said to have medical science and to be a physician, so
230 Intro|          adviser of a king has royal science and is a king. And the master
231 Intro|           Hence we conclude that the science of the king, statesman,
232 Intro|           one and the same. And this science is akin to knowledge rather
233 Intro|           his hands.~But theoretical science may be a science either
234 Intro|         theoretical science may be a science either of judging, like
235 Intro|              master-builder. And the science of the king is of the latter
236 Intro|              Here let us sum up:—The science of pure knowledge had a
237 Intro|             had a part which was the science of command, and this had
238 Intro|          this had a part which was a science of wholesale command; and
239 Intro|              the political and royal science. And yet we have not clearly
240 Intro|         characterizing the political science, and in separating the true
241 Intro|     political differs from the royal science. Thus we have drawn several
242 Intro|              concern with the kingly science; any more than the arts (
243 Intro|          economical and not to royal science. Nor am I referring to government
244 Intro|            name? Is not government a science, and are we to suppose that
245 Intro|               Can the many attain to science? In no Hellenic city are
246 Intro|           possessed of the political science. A true government must
247 Intro|               Viewed in the light of science, would not the continuance
248 Intro|           persons can attain to this science. And hence follows an important
249 Intro|            be extended to any art or science. But what would be the consequence?~‘
250 Intro|               whether by the help of science or opinion, this is called
251 Intro|      monarchy; and when he has royal science he is a king, whether he
252 Intro|           absolutely ignorant of the science which they profess.~Let
253 Intro|            which adhere to the royal science, and must be drawn off in
254 Intro|              and there is a superior science, which determines whether
255 Intro|            the governor of them. The science which determines whether
256 Intro|           the art of persuasion; the science which determines whether
257 Intro|              art of the general. The science which makes the laws, is
258 Intro|            administers them. And the science which has this authority
259 Intro|      authority over the rest, is the science of the king or statesman.~
260 Intro|         endeavour to view this royal science by the light of our example.
261 Intro|            making the web. The royal science is queen of educators, and
262 Intro|              is that which the royal science weaves, combining the two
263 Intro|            of weaving with the royal science, trying to separate either
264 Intro|            ones. Besides the supreme science of dialectic, ‘which will
265 Intro|             time appears in view—the science of government, which fixes
266 Intro|            of the political or royal science as, from another point of
267 Intro|           another point of view, the science of sciences, which holds
268 Intro|        passing mention of economical science; the opposition of rest
269 Intro|           affirms that in some sense science is really supreme over human
270 Intro|         personification of political science. And yet he is something
271 Intro|             achievement of political science. In the Protagoras, Socrates
272 Intro|             the infancy of political science, men naturally ask whether
273 Text |          ranked among those who have science.~YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes.~STRANGER:
274 Text |        assume these two divisions of science, which is one whole.~STRANGER:
275 Text |              the same; or is there a science or art answering to each
276 Text |             STRANGER: But surely the science of a true king is royal
277 Text |              of a true king is royal science?~YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes.~STRANGER:
278 Text |        clearly see that there is one science of all of them; and this
279 Text |             of all of them; and this science may be called either royal
280 Text |             the statesman—the kingly science and the king.~YOUNG SOCRATES:
281 Text |              to share in theoretical science?~YOUNG SOCRATES: Quite true.~
282 Text |           supreme or ruling-for-self science, leaving the rest to receive
283 Text |               For, surely, the royal science is not like that of a master-workman,
284 Text |          that of a master-workman, a science presiding over lifeless
285 Text |          STRANGER: And the political science of which we are in search,
286 Text |             quickly at the political science; for this mistake has already
287 Text |          Suppose that you divide the science which manages pedestrian
288 Text |       STRANGER: In this way: let the science of managing pedestrian animals
289 Text |             all means.~STRANGER: The science of pure knowledge had, as
290 Text |     originally, a part which was the science of rule or command, and
291 Text |             knows that department of science. And he is their merry-maker
292 Text |        STRANGER: But no other art or science will have a prior or better
293 Text |          better right than the royal science to care for human society
294 Text |             previous case, the royal science differed from the political?~
295 Text |      Certainly.~STRANGER: But if the science of the Statesman disappears,
296 Text |             the search for the royal science will be impossible.~YOUNG
297 Text |             undisputed master of his science.~YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes, we
298 Text |             and with this the kingly science has no concern at all.~YOUNG
299 Text |              the royal and political science.~YOUNG SOCRATES: I agree.~
300 Text |         certainly do not claim royal science.~YOUNG SOCRATES: Certainly
301 Text |            profess to share in royal science?~YOUNG SOCRATES: Certainly
302 Text |     principal claimants to political science would be found somewhere
303 Text |            of servile or ministerial science, and are thought to be the
304 Text |          said that royal power was a science?~YOUNG SOCRATES: Yes.~STRANGER:
305 Text |       SOCRATES: Yes.~STRANGER: And a science of a peculiar kind, which
306 Text |               not losing the idea of science, but unable as yet to determine
307 Text |             nature of the particular science?~YOUNG SOCRATES: True.~STRANGER:
308 Text |           riches; but some notion of science must enter into it, if we
309 Text |              forms of States may the science of government, which is
310 Text |           State can attain political science?~YOUNG SOCRATES: Impossible.~
311 Text |               In that case political science would certainly be the easiest
312 Text |              those who possess royal science, whether they rule or not,
313 Text |              really found to possess science, and are not mere pretenders,
314 Text |             who really had the royal science, if he had been able to
315 Text |               Viewed in the light of science and true art, would not
316 Text |              draught-playing, or any science conversant with number,
317 Text |             steps of the true man of science pretends that he can only
318 Text |         separated from the political science.~YOUNG SOCRATES: So I perceive.~
319 Text |             separated from political science, and what is precious and
320 Text |              there any higher art or science, having power to decide
321 Text |           And do we acknowledge this science to be different from the
322 Text |       superior to this, or no single science to any other? Or ought this
323 Text |             any other? Or ought this science to be the overseer and governor
324 Text |             You mean to say that the science which judges whether we
325 Text |              must be superior to the science which is learned or which
326 Text |          superior.~STRANGER: And the science which determines whether
327 Text |              must be superior to the science which is able to persuade?~
328 Text |               Very good; and to what science do we assign the power of
329 Text |      rhetoric.~STRANGER: And to what science do we give the power of
330 Text |              YOUNG SOCRATES: To that science which governs the arts of
331 Text |             another sort of power or science?~YOUNG SOCRATES: What science?~
332 Text |        science?~YOUNG SOCRATES: What science?~STRANGER: The science which
333 Text |          What science?~STRANGER: The science which has to do with military
334 Text |             that to be regarded as a science or not?~YOUNG SOCRATES:
335 Text |             regarded as other than a science?~STRANGER: And is the art
336 Text |             agree.~STRANGER: And the science which is over them all,
337 Text |            In like manner, the royal science appears to me to be the
338 Text |           with the good, or that any science would seriously think of
339 Text |          natures, whenever the royal science has drawn the two minds


The Symposium
    Part
340 Intro|          revealed to him of a single science of universal beauty, and
341 Intro|       physicist, anticipating modern science, saw, or thought that he
342 Intro|         finally reunited in a single science (compare Rep.). At first
343 Text |          revealed to him of a single science, which is the science of
344 Text |         single science, which is the science of beauty everywhere. To


Theaetetus
    Part
345 Intro|            great geometrician, whose science is thus indicated to be
346 Intro|         throwing down definitions of science and knowledge. Proceeding
347 Intro|             the meaning of the word ‘science’ could scarcely be explained
348 Intro|             to attain distinction in science. ‘Yes, Socrates, there is
349 Intro|               but, as he is a man of science, he may be a judge of our
350 Intro|             suppose a hunt after the science of odd and even, or some
351 Intro|              and even, or some other science. The possession of the birds
352 Intro|             inductive portion of any science may be small, as in mathematics
353 Intro|             a sort of nominalism ‘La science est une langue bien faite.’
354 Intro|       another, could be framed until science obtained a content. The
355 Intro|              age of Plato thought of science only as pure abstraction,
356 Intro|              than enlightened mental science. It is hard to say how many
357 Intro|           the hymn of dialectic, the science of relations, of ideas,
358 Intro|           sense are reconstructed in science. They and not the mere impressions
359 Intro|          branches of knowledge; when science is able to apply her tests,
360 Intro|      exercised over them by physical science. But any interpretation
361 Intro| interpretation of nature by physical science is far in advance of such
362 Intro|            the daylight of inductive science.~The attractiveness of such
363 Intro|             claim the authority of a science; but it is only an hypothesis
364 Intro|            false analogy of Physical Science and has great expectations
365 Intro|      conditions of this very inexact science, and we shall only know
366 Intro|           fact therefore that such a science exists and is popular, affords
367 Intro|            down to us. The imaginary science may be called, in the language
368 Intro|         Psychology the position of a science at all; it cannot, like
369 Intro|       although they can never become science in the ordinary sense of
370 Intro|            the character of an exact science. We cannot say that words
371 Intro|              elements from which the science or study of the mind proceeds.
372 Intro|             be said that there is no science which does not contribute
373 Intro|      knowledge of it. The methods of science and their analogies are
374 Intro|          claim to the authority of a science, has called attention to
375 Intro|         pains to analyze them.’~e. A science such as Psychology is not
376 Intro|           extent, not as a branch of science, but as a collection of
377 Intro|    Metaphysic. It is a fragment of a science only, which in all probability
378 Intro|          influence of the body. Both science and poetry are made up of
379 Intro|         philosophy, and to the whole science of man. There can be no
380 Text |        cobbling, you mean the art or science of making shoes?~THEAETETUS:
381 Text |            he who does not know what science or knowledge is, has no
382 Text |              knowledge of the art or science of making shoes?~THEAETETUS:
383 Text |           SOCRATES: Nor of any other science?~THEAETETUS: No.~SOCRATES:
384 Text |             when a man is asked what science or knowledge is, to give
385 Text |              the name of some art or science is ridiculous; for the question
386 Text |       SOCRATES: And therefore not in science or knowledge?~THEAETETUS:
387 Text |             the same as knowledge or science?~THEAETETUS: Clearly not,
388 Text |             and ‘we have or have not science or knowledge,’ as if we
389 Text |             deprived of knowledge or science.~THEAETETUS: But if you
390 Text |             form of a hunt after the science of odd and even in general.~
391 Text |              numbers, for he has the science of all numbers in his mind?~


Timaeus
    Part
392 Intro|              the infancy of physical science, out of the confusion of
393 Intro|             or microscope; the great science of chemistry is a blank
394 Intro|         importance to his guesses at science. He is not at all absorbed
395 Intro|            the discoveries of modern science.~Section 1.~Socrates begins
396 Intro|             unconscious influence of science has to be subtracted, before
397 Intro|          them; they were to physical science what the poems of Homer
398 Intro|         which geology does to modern science. But the Greek was not,
399 Intro|              perhaps two branches of science. But he comparatively seldom
400 Intro|             faintly, in the glass of science, but indissolubly connected
401 Intro|            way of describing ancient science. It is the mistake of an
402 Intro|       probably did more for physical science by asserting the supremacy
403 Intro|       enlarging with the progress of science and knowledge. At first
404 Intro|     mythology into philosophy. Early science is not a process of discovery
405 Intro|            the discoveries of modern science. The modern physical philosopher
406 Intro|   absurdities of ancient ideas about science, on the haphazard fancies
407 Intro|              of the truths of modern science, though he is not wholly
408 Intro|     peace-maker between theology and science. Plato also approaches very
409 Intro|       discoveries of modern physical science. First, the doctrine of
410 Intro|          beginning and foundation of science; there is nothing that he
411 Intro|       philosophies. For the physical science of the ancients was traditional,
412 Intro|             the progress of physical science, how the responsibility
413 Text |           ancient tradition, nor any science which is hoary with age.
414 Text |         familiar with the methods of science.~In the first place, then,