Charmides
    Part
  1 PreF |      writings of Plato, but not a unity of design in the whole,
  2 PreF |      whole, nor perhaps a perfect unity in any single Dialogue.
  3 PreS |          not to diversity, but to unity. Other entities or intelligences
  4 PreS |          s writings there is both unity, and also growth and development;


Cratylus
    Part
  5 Intro|          another, careless of the unity of his work, not fearing
  6 Intro|        effort of the mind to give unity to infinitely various phenomena.
  7 Intro|          too are attempts to give unity and regularity to a subject
  8 Intro|           then is a real basis of unity in the study of philology,
  9 Intro|           that imaginary abstract unity of which we were just now
 10 Intro|         either for or against the unity of the human race. Nor is


Gorgias
    Part
 11 Intro|         certain natural growth or unity; the beginning is not forgotten
 12 Intro|          We must not neglect this unity, but neither must we attempt
 13 Intro|            or he will never be at unity with himself; and discord


Laches
    Part
 14 Intro|   intimation of the connexion and unity of virtue and knowledge,


Laws
    Book
 15 3    |         free; and secondly, be at unity with herself; and thirdly,
 16 4    |     partake of immortality in the unity of generation. And for a
 17 6    |   appointment of offices. Perfect unity and exactness, extending


Lysis
    Part
 18 Text |        said of them, are never at unity with one another or with


Meno
    Part
 19 Intro|    partial view of the origin and unity of knowledge, and of the
 20 Intro|           as ideas, and to have a unity which is the idea of good
 21 Intro|          affording a principle of unity in the material frame of


Parmenides
    Part
 22 Intro|       abstract ideas of likeness, unity, and the rest, exist apart
 23 Intro|         simplest of all notions, ‘unity’; you cannot even assert
 24 Intro|           same difficulties about Unity and Being are raised in
 25 Intro|           to prove indirectly the unity of the Idea in the multiplicity
 26 Intro|      therefore the others have no unity, nor plurality, nor duality,
 27 Intro|   division. And they will have no unity or number, but only a semblance
 28 Intro|           but only a semblance of unity and number; and the least
 29 Intro|          abstraction of undefined unity, answering to the Hegelian ‘
 30 Intro|           have various degrees of unity and plurality. But in whatever
 31 Intro|           the human mind in which Unity and Being occupied the attention
 32 Intro|         two idols in particular, ‘Unity’ and ‘Being,’ which had
 33 Intro|          of contradiction and the unity of knowledge are asserted;
 34 Intro|          Plato has the notions of Unity and Being. These weeds of
 35 Intro|    existence of universals or the unity under which they are comprehended.
 36 Text | overwhelming evidence. You affirm unity, he denies plurality. And
 37 Text |         of them to be an absolute unity. He who hears what may be
 38 Text |          whole, being one perfect unity framed out of all—of this
 39 Text |         or have in themselves any unity?~There is not.~Nor are the
 40 Text |           but smaller, because no unity can be conceived of any
 41 Text |           be conceived of without unity?~Certainly.~And such being


Phaedo
    Part
 42 Intro|           Socrates, but, like the unity of God, had a foundation
 43 Intro|           was eternal too. As the unity of God was more distinctly
 44 Intro|         No Dialogue has a greater unity of subject and feeling.
 45 Text |          appearance of variety in unity. And in this fair region


Phaedrus
    Part
 46 Intro|         like Plato cannot fail in unity, and that the unity of a
 47 Intro|       fail in unity, and that the unity of a dialogue requires a
 48 Intro|    subject. But the conception of unity really applies in very different
 49 Intro|          which the requirement of unity is most stringent; nor should
 50 Intro|            nor should the idea of unity derived from one sort of
 51 Intro|       every great artist he gives unity of form to the different


Philebus
    Part
 52 Intro|      These are (I) the paradox of unity and plurality; (II) the
 53 Intro|        understand how an absolute unity, such as the Eleatic Being,
 54 Intro|  existence is the copula, or that unity is a mere unit, is to us
 55 Intro|    axiomata’) in the passage from unity to infinity. With him the
 56 Intro|   coexistence of opposites in the unity of the idea is regarded
 57 Intro|        the denial of plurality in unity which is also attributed
 58 Intro|          pass at once either from unity to infinity, or from infinity
 59 Intro|     infinity, or from infinity to unity. In music, for example,
 60 Intro|          the seriousness with the unity of opposites is regarded
 61 Text |       which would go to prove the unity of the most extreme opposites.
 62 Text |          in those cases, and when unity is of this concrete nature,
 63 Text |          then how each individual unity, being always the same,
 64 Text |          subject of enquiry; this unity we shall find in everything.
 65 Text |          units, until at last the unity with which we began is seen
 66 Text |      species intermediate between unity and infinity has been discovered,—
 67 Text |           conceiving plurality in unity. Having no method, they
 68 Text |         and many anyhow, and from unity pass at once to infinity;
 69 Text |        begins with any individual unity, should proceed from that,
 70 Text |       infinity should not jump to unity, but he should look about
 71 Text |      kinds of everything that has unity, likeness, sameness, or
 72 Text |          infinite, which is their unity, for, as was asserted in
 73 Text |      argument we placed under the unity of more and less.~PROTARCHUS:
 74 Text |          making us believe in the unity of that art; and then again,


Protagoras
    Part
 75 Intro|        that the Dialogue fails in unity, and has not a proper beginning,
 76 Intro|     certainly does not aim at any unity which is inconsistent with
 77 Intro|           increased clearness and unity of ideas. But to a great
 78 Intro|     tiresome, but seeking for the unity of virtue and knowledge
 79 Intro|          Dialogue, is to show the unity of virtue. In the determination
 80 Intro|           pleasure for a less—the unity of virtue and the identity
 81 Text |      quality, and this quality or unity is not the art of the carpenter,


The Republic
    Book
 82 1    |       action because he is not at unity with himself, and in the
 83 4    |         far as is consistent with unity; that, I think, is the proper
 84 5    |   distraction and plurality where unity ought to reign? or any greater
 85 5    |     greater good than the bond of unity? ~There cannot. ~And there
 86 5    |       There cannot. ~And there is unity where there is community
 87 5    |           chief reason. ~And this unity of feeling we admitted to
 88 6    |          of ours having a natural unity. But a human being who in
 89 7    |             And to which class do unity and number belong? ~I do
 90 7    |         the answer; for if simple unity could be adequately perceived
 91 7    |           asks, "What is absolute unity?" This is the way in which
 92 7    |       attempts to divide absolute unity when he is calculating,
 93 7    |            as you say, there is a unity such as you demand, and
 94 10   |       circumstances is the man at unity with himself-or, rather,


The Sophist
    Part
 95 Intro|       national decline of genius, unity, political force, which
 96 Intro|         relation of plurality and unity, which were supposed to
 97 Intro|      predication; 4. they go from unity to plurality, without passing
 98 Intro|   analysis of the simple ideas of Unity or Being. In the Sophist
 99 Intro|           deny both plurality and unity? You, Theaetetus, have the
100 Intro|        mean by their assertion of unity, or by their combinations
101 Intro|         has parts is not one, for unity has no parts. Is being,
102 Intro|          to consider, such as the unity of opposites, the conception
103 Intro|           Hegelian dialectic.~The unity of opposites was the crux
104 Intro|          would deny.~The Platonic unity of differences or opposites
105 Intro|          the Hegelian concrete or unity of abstractions. In the
106 Intro|          abstractions in a higher unity: the ordinary mechanism
107 Intro|           bases his system on the unity of opposites, although in
108 Intro|         One of these forms is the unity of opposites. Abstractions
109 Text |         not,’ do we not attribute unity?~THEAETETUS: Manifestly.~
110 Text |         it’ would imply a form of unity.~THEAETETUS: Quite true.~
111 Text |       into it either existence or unity or plurality.~THEAETETUS:
112 Text |      image, as though it were the unity under which they were all
113 Text |    alternation of them; peace and unity sometimes prevailing under
114 Text |           that he who asserts the unity of being will find a difficulty
115 Text |         that there is nothing but unity, is surely ridiculous?~THEAETETUS:
116 Text |           one, and being absolute unity, will represent a mere name.~
117 Text |         may have the attribute of unity in all the parts, and in
118 Text |      condition cannot be absolute unity?~THEAETETUS: Why not?~STRANGER:
119 Text |           it has the attribute of unity? Or shall we say that being
120 Text |           having the attribute of unity, and there be such a thing
121 Text |       whole is at rest, either as unity or in many forms: and he


The Statesman
    Part
122 Intro|      common error of passing from unity to infinity, but to find
123 Text |    STRANGER: Then while we are at unity among ourselves, we need
124 Text |          a man has first seen the unity of things, to go on with


The Symposium
    Part
125 Intro|      fixed in fond amazement. The unity of truth, the consistency
126 Text |       succession and not absolute unity: a man is called the same,


Theaetetus
    Part
127 Intro|          sameness and difference, unity and plurality, are acknowledged
128 Intro|    consciousness; but this mental unity is apt to be concealed from
129 Intro|     disorderly, but also having a unity (however imperfect) of their
130 Intro|      sensations devoid of life or unity. Why should we not go a
131 Intro|         mind. There is no organic unity in a succession of feeling
132 Intro|          primitive conceptions of unity, being, rest, motion, and
133 Intro|         elements of plurality and unity have not been duly adjusted.
134 Intro|        say, it is not a connected unity of knowledge. Compared with
135 Intro|           assert consistently the unity of the human faculties,
136 Intro|          the human faculties, the unity of knowledge, the unity
137 Intro|           unity of knowledge, the unity of God and law. The difference
138 Text |           difference, and also of unity and other numbers which


Timaeus
    Part
139 Intro|         there should be a want of unity in a work which embraces
140 Intro|       four elements; and being at unity with itself it was indissoluble
141 Intro|            The words ‘being,’ or ‘unity,’ or essence,’ or ‘good,’
142 Intro|         words, only measurable by unity). The square of any such
143 Text |          eternity itself rests in unity; and this image we call
144 Text |       equability, and is again at unity with itself, because the