Charmides
    Part
  1 PreF |             based on the silence of Aristotle, is not worthy of much consideration.
  2 PreF |       consideration. For why should Aristotle, because he has quoted several
  3 PreF |        Hippocrates, to Xenophon, to Aristotle? The Alexandrian Canon of
  4 PreS |             supposed to be based on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, a passage
  5 PreS |          laid in the Metaphysics of Aristotle. But we cannot argue, either
  6 PreS |          philosophical treatises of Aristotle, to the dialogues of Plato
  7 PreS |        Greece and upon the world by Aristotle and his philosophy. But
  8 PreS |           them is to be ascribed to Aristotle’s own hand, how much is
  9 PreS |        Plato out of the writings of Aristotle. In the chapter of the Metaphysics
 10 PreS |          they are not statements of Aristotle respecting Plato, but of
 11 PreS |            and came to the front in Aristotle, are variously discussed
 12 Intro|           the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle.~The beautiful youth, Charmides,
 13 Intro|             almost in the spirit of Aristotle, how can there be a knowledge


Cratylus
    Part
 14 Intro|       except that he is recorded by Aristotle to have been the friend


Euthydemus
    Part
 15 Intro|           the Sophistici Elenchi of Aristotle and are retained at the
 16 Intro|    illusions of words.~The logic of Aristotle is for the most part latent
 17 Intro|         sense, not the analytics of Aristotle, are needed for their overthrow.
 18 Intro|      generally unconscious of them.~Aristotle has analysed several of


Euthyphro
    Part
 19 Intro|           prior to the state (as in Aristotle the energeia precedes the


The First Alcibiades
    Part
 20 Pre  |            of much value is that of Aristotle; for the Alexandrian catalogues
 21 Pre  |         several of the citations of Aristotle omit the name of Plato,
 22 Pre  |          and in the next generation Aristotle, are all said to have composed
 23 Pre  |             certainly Plato’s which Aristotle attributes to him by name,
 24 Pre  |      writings. But the testimony of Aristotle cannot always be distinguished
 25 Pre  |             also a possibility that Aristotle was mistaken, or may have
 26 Pre  |             his later writings from Aristotle.~The dialogues which appear
 27 Pre  |        Funeral Oration are cited by Aristotle; the first in the Metaphysics,
 28 Pre  |         Hippias’ in the singular by Aristotle, we may perhaps infer that
 29 Pre  |          will urge the authority of Aristotle; and they will detect in
 30 Pre  |         Funeral Oration is cited by Aristotle, and is interesting as supplying
 31 Pre  |        verified by the testimony of Aristotle, and in many respects at
 32 Pre  |      character which is apparent in Aristotle and Hippocrates, although
 33 Pre  |              unlike the writings of Aristotle, seem never to have been


Gorgias
    Part
 34 Intro|         predicates;—a mistake which Aristotle partly shares and partly
 35 Intro|         politics. Both in Plato and Aristotle, as well as in the Stoics,


Ion
    Part
 36 Intro|       idiotic themselves.’ (Compare Aristotle, Met.)~Ion the rhapsode


Lysis
    Part
 37 Intro|           the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. As in other writings of
 38 Intro|         exercised the minds both of Aristotle and Plato.~5) Can we expect


Menexenus
    Part
 39 Pre  |            of much value is that of Aristotle; for the Alexandrian catalogues
 40 Pre  |         several of the citations of Aristotle omit the name of Plato,
 41 Pre  |          and in the next generation Aristotle, are all said to have composed
 42 Pre  |             certainly Plato’s which Aristotle attributes to him by name,
 43 Pre  |      writings. But the testimony of Aristotle cannot always be distinguished
 44 Pre  |             also a possibility that Aristotle was mistaken, or may have
 45 Pre  |             his later writings from Aristotle.~The dialogues which appear
 46 Pre  |        Funeral Oration are cited by Aristotle; the first in the Metaphysics,
 47 Pre  |         Hippias’ in the singular by Aristotle, we may perhaps infer that
 48 Pre  |          will urge the authority of Aristotle; and they will detect in
 49 Pre  |         Funeral Oration is cited by Aristotle, and is interesting as supplying
 50 Pre  |        verified by the testimony of Aristotle, and in many respects at
 51 Pre  |      character which is apparent in Aristotle and Hippocrates, although
 52 Pre  |              unlike the writings of Aristotle, seem never to have been
 53 Intro|            the express testimony of Aristotle, who quotes, in the Rhetoric,


Meno
    Part
 54 Intro|        knowledge of causes (compare Aristotle’s theory of episteme); and (
 55 Intro|            and might be ascribed to Aristotle himself, or to one of his
 56 Intro|           find in the first book of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, of the derivation
 57 Intro|           facts than the Organon of Aristotle or the Platonic idea of


Parmenides
    Part
 58 Intro|              if not quite, those of Aristotle; they are the objections
 59 Intro|     spurious. Nor is the silence of Aristotle to be hastily assumed; there
 60 Intro|          The stereotyped form which Aristotle has given to them is not
 61 Intro|          the dogmatic statements of Aristotle, and also by the degeneracy
 62 Intro|             mind of Plato, to which Aristotle alludes (Met.), when, as
 63 Intro|         some of them had given what Aristotle calls ‘a form,’ others had
 64 Intro|            an indistinct light upon Aristotle, and makes us aware of the


Phaedo
    Part
 65 Intro|            means? Shall we say with Aristotle, that the soul is the entelechy
 66 Intro|        writers, and particularly in Aristotle. For Plato and Aristotle
 67 Intro|            Aristotle. For Plato and Aristotle are not further removed


Phaedrus
    Part
 68 Intro|            or semi-rational soul of Aristotle. And thus, for the first


Philebus
    Part
 69 Intro|             of pleasure is found in Aristotle, who agrees with Plato in
 70 Intro|    Heracliteans, whom he is said by Aristotle to have cultivated in his
 71 Intro|         generalization, seeking, as Aristotle says, for the universal
 72 Intro|            from us—Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, the Epicureans,
 73 Intro|             an end is proved, as in Aristotle’s time, so in our own, by
 74 Intro|          the confusion (not made by Aristotle) between conscious and unconscious
 75 Intro|             or Hegel, for Plato and Aristotle alongside of it. They do
 76 Intro|             reached the confines of Aristotle, but we make a somewhat
 77 Intro|           Physics or Metaphysics of Aristotle. It is this interval upon
 78 Intro|             to the other. Plato and Aristotle do not dovetail into one
 79 Intro|             is to be interpreted by Aristotle, but Aristotle by Plato.
 80 Intro|       interpreted by Aristotle, but Aristotle by Plato. Of all philosophy
 81 Intro|            any close connexion with Aristotle, he is now a long way from
 82 Intro|         these questions reappear in Aristotle, as does also the distinction
 83 Intro|             which have been lost in Aristotle; and many things in Aristotle
 84 Intro|       Aristotle; and many things in Aristotle not to be found in Plato.
 85 Intro|            remarkable deficiency in Aristotle is the disappearance of
 86 Intro|             Theophrastus as well as Aristotle and of the remains of other
 87 Intro|        which pass under the name of Aristotle, whether we suppose them
 88 Intro|          were current in the age of Aristotle we have no exact account.
 89 Intro|          Physics and Metaphysics of Aristotle, for which it has puzzled


Protagoras
    Part
 90 Intro|     knowledge; or to point out with Aristotle that the same quality may
 91 Intro|           to be knowledge. Here, as Aristotle remarks, Socrates and Plato


The Second Alcibiades
    Part
 92 Pre  |    Alcibiades] are not mentioned by Aristotle, or by any early authority,
 93 Text |             by his beloved (compare Aristotle, Pol.), whose love for the


The Sophist
    Part
 94 Intro|      acquainted with the Organon of Aristotle. But could the Organon of
 95 Intro|            But could the Organon of Aristotle ever have been written unless
 96 Intro|  philosophies, was not dispelled by Aristotle, but by Socrates and Plato.
 97 Intro|       processes of truth and error, Aristotle, in the next generation,
 98 Intro|           the technical language of Aristotle, in the frequent use of
 99 Intro|         Plato, Xenophon, Isocrates, Aristotle, all give a bad import to
100 Intro|         philosophers from Thales to Aristotle, and the Sophists of the
101 Intro|     attributed, on the authority of Aristotle, the denial of predication,
102 Intro|            endless activity of mind Aristotle in his Metaphysics has preserved
103 Intro|          him in the Republic, as by Aristotle in his Organon. Yet he is
104 Intro|    dialectic. This is the origin of Aristotle’s Architectonic, which seems,
105 Intro|           rejoicing. Most men (like Aristotle) have been accustomed to
106 Intro|          was finally established by Aristotle and the Stoics. Thus, according
107 Intro|   vibrations of a pendulum. Even in Aristotle and Plato, rightly understood,
108 Intro|         Hegel). The true meaning of Aristotle has been disguised from
109 Intro|   uncertainty of chronology;—if, as Aristotle says, there were Atomists
110 Intro|           of Socrates and Plato and Aristotle have certainly sunk deep
111 Intro|        language of Plato or even of Aristotle is but slightly removed


The Statesman
    Part
112 Intro|             not originally found in Aristotle, but in Plato.~The doctrine
113 Intro|            of God or man.~Plato and Aristotle are sensible of the difficulty
114 Intro|           for the attainment of it. Aristotle, casting aside ideals, would
115 Intro|             be, on the authority of Aristotle and on the ground of their


Theaetetus
    Part
116 Intro|            later writers, including Aristotle in his Metaphysics, have
117 Intro|             age. ‘The ancients,’ as Aristotle (De Anim.) says, citing
118 Intro|            he himself is treated by Aristotle; that is to say, he does
119 Intro|          Protagoras is connected by Aristotle as well as Plato with the
120 Intro|            flux of Heracleitus. But Aristotle is only following Plato,
121 Intro|    philosophers, and with Plato and Aristotle themselves, what was really
122 Intro|           saying, often repeated by Aristotle and others, that ‘philosophy
123 Intro|         sense, developed further by Aristotle, and the explicit declaration,
124 Intro| nevertheless present to the mind of Aristotle as well as Plato, and the
125 Intro|         they were both tending. For Aristotle as well as Plato would in
126 Intro|          body, in the same way that Aristotle (partly following Plato)
127 Intro|         synthetical propositions to Aristotle. The philosopher of Konigsberg
128 Intro|      stumbling on the threshold. In Aristotle the process is more nearly
129 Intro|         interval between Thales and Aristotle were realized the distinctions
130 Intro|            drifted so far away from Aristotle, that if we were to frame


Timaeus
    Part
131 Intro|     philosopher and another—between Aristotle and Plato, or between the
132 Intro|       supremacy of mathematics than Aristotle or his disciples by their
133 Intro|          metaphysical philosophy of Aristotle and his followers. But besides
134 Intro|            admit, further, (3) that Aristotle attributed to Plato the
135 Intro|          this is the sense in which Aristotle understood the word, but
136 Intro|        Rotation of the Earth’) from Aristotle De Coelo, Book II (Greek)
137 Intro|           of minor importance, that Aristotle, as Proclus and Simplicius
138 Intro|          not lay too much stress on Aristotle or the writer De Caelo having
139 Intro|           the citations of Plato in Aristotle are frequently misinterpreted
140 Intro|             of the universe, or, as Aristotle and Mr. Grote suppose, that
141 Intro|     sometimes only in degree. As in Aristotle’s matter and form the connexion
142 Intro|          difficulty, by the help of Aristotle and later writers, in criticizing
143 Intro|          nor any reference to it in Aristotle, nor any citation of an