Charmides
    Part
  1 PreS |      sciences to ontology.’~This theory is supposed to be based
  2 PreS |        Greek); and in the ‘Later Theory’ is held to be the (Greek)
  3 PreS |          to suppose that Plato’s theory, or, rather, his various
  4 PreS |    ascribed. It is true that the theory of Ideas takes several different
  5 PreS |         safe for the author of a theory about ancient philosophy
  6 PreS |        to confirm a preconceived theory, which is the defect of
  7 PreS |   inclined, having constructed a theory, to make the chronology
  8 PreS |          to Dr. Jackson’s ‘Later Theory,’ Plato’s Ideas, which were
  9 PreS |    unmeaning?~(5) To this ‘Later Theory’ of Plato’s Ideas I oppose
 10 PreS |   dialogues, in which the ‘Later Theory of Ideas’ is supposed to
 11 Intro|       yet received a solution in theory, has been already answered


Cratylus
    Part
 12 Intro|   character of Socrates. For the theory of language can only be
 13 Intro|     upholder of the conventional theory of language, which he acknowledges
 14 Intro|         only be based on his own theory of ideas? Or if this latter
 15 Intro|          desire to bring Plato’s theory of language into accordance
 16 Intro|     later writings by a rational theory of psychology. (See introductions
 17 Intro|         ideas; 2nd, that Plato’s theory of language is not inconsistent
 18 Intro|   supporter of the Onomatopoetic theory of language; that is to
 19 Intro| Heracleiteanism of Cratylus.~The theory of language which is propounded
 20 Intro|    medium we have to receive our theory of language.~There remains
 21 Intro|        analogies in support of a theory. Etymology in ancient as
 22 Intro|         set up, the Heracleitean theory of language.~In the latter
 23 Intro|          I always resort to this theory of a foreign origin when
 24 Intro|         give some account of his theory. Hermogenes and himself
 25 Intro|      given, which would favour a theory of rest rather than of motion. ‘
 26 Intro|          speech, an intelligible theory, a superficial observation
 27 Intro|    saying that this or any other theory of language is proved by
 28 Intro|        stirred by the wind.’ The theory is consistent or not inconsistent
 29 Intro|         knowledge, the Darwinian theory, unless very precisely defined,
 30 Intro|   fittest’ the maintainer of the theory intends to affirm nothing
 31 Intro|    applications of the Darwinian theory. As in animal life and likewise
 32 Intro|        piece of joiner’s work,—a theory of language which is more
 33 Intro|      philosophy of language from theory to fact; it has passed out
 34 Text |         you have really a better theory of the truth of names, you


Gorgias
    Part
 35 Intro|          support of them. When a theory is running away with us,
 36 Intro|        consequences.~(3) Plato’s theory of punishment is partly
 37 Intro|      suggests the necessity. The theory of the many weak combining
 38 Intro|         same relation to Plato’s theory of morals which the Theaetetus
 39 Intro|          Theaetetus bears to his theory of knowledge.~d. A few minor


Ion
    Part
 40 Intro|           The elements of a true theory of poetry are contained


Laws
    Book
 41 3    |         enquiring about an empty theory, but about events which
 42 5    |       them in fact as well as in theory. And now, let us proceed


Lysis
    Part
 43 Text |        it? and may not the other theory have been only a long story


Meno
    Part
 44 Intro|          Socrates replies by his theory of reminiscence.~To the
 45 Intro|         He has practice, but not theory; art, but not science. This
 46 Intro|      causes (compare Aristotle’s theory of episteme); and (2) that
 47 Intro|         foundation not only of a theory of knowledge, but of a doctrine
 48 Intro|          a caricature of a great theory of knowledge, which Plato
 49 Intro|         an exposition of Plato’s theory of ideas, but with a view
 50 Intro|  Parmenides.) In the Sophist the theory of ideas is spoken of as
 51 Intro|         the derivation of such a theory or of any part of it from
 52 Intro|   abstract from the concrete, or theory from fact, or the divine


Parmenides
    Part
 53 Intro|         which he assails his own theory of Ideas. The arguments
 54 Intro|         end.’ ‘Quite true.’ ‘The theory, then, of participation
 55 Intro|          any other psychological theory falls very far short of
 56 Intro|    compare Soph.). But his ideal theory is not based on antinomies.
 57 Intro|         Ideas, and replaced by a theory of classification; the Good
 58 Intro| constantly engaged both with the theory and practice of classification.
 59 Text |  partakes of it?~Quite true.~The theory, then, that other things


Phaedo
    Part
 60 Intro|         into connection with his theory of knowledge. In proportion
 61 Intro|      soul than they are in their theory of knowledge.~17. Living
 62 Intro|     immortality of the soul is a theory of knowledge, and that in
 63 Intro|   ethical writings, as about his theory of knowledge. And while
 64 Intro|         writings of Plato is the theory of them so completely developed.
 65 Intro|        of ideas. In the Meno the theory of ideas is based on the


Philebus
    Part
 66 Intro|        Plato. The transcendental theory of pre-existent ideas, which
 67 Intro|        Philebus and Gorgias. The theory of the simultaneousness
 68 Intro|         comedy sufficiently by a theory which only applies to comedy
 69 Intro|       desire to bring down their theory to the level of their practice.
 70 Intro| happiness of mankind.~There is a theory which has been contrasted
 71 Intro|          by Paley and others—the theory of a moral sense: Are our
 72 Intro|     greater interval between the theory and practice of Christians
 73 Intro|      Christians than between the theory and practice of the Greeks
 74 Intro|         now proceed to state the theory of Utility, not exactly
 75 Intro|        have passed over from one theory of morals to the opposite.
 76 Intro|          greater disagreement in theory about the right relations
 77 Intro|         also may be developed in theory into counsels of perfection.~
 78 Intro|      seeing that the utilitarian theory supplies a much easier explanation
 79 Intro|         interval the utilitarian theory takes no cognizance. The
 80 Intro|        to offer any ground for a theory of obligation. For admitting
 81 Intro|          Once more: turning from theory to practice we feel the
 82 Intro|     naturally connected with one theory of morals, the virtues of


The Republic
    Book
 83 4    |        have another trial of the theory. The friction of the two
 84 5    |          To be sure. ~And is our theory a worse theory because we
 85 5    |        And is our theory a worse theory because we are unable to


The Sophist
    Part
 86 Intro|          for our consideration a theory of the nature of the negative.~
 87 Intro|      nature of the negative.~The theory is, that Not-being is relation.
 88 Intro|         than the want of a sound theory of language. He speaks as
 89 Intro|           And can that be a true theory of the history of philosophy
 90 Intro|        and that those who are in theory most opposed to them are


The Statesman
    Part
 91 Text |         to put forward a strange theory about them.~YOUNG SOCRATES:


Theaetetus
    Part
 92 Intro|          the Theaetetus; (2) the theory of rest, which Socrates
 93 Intro|    overturning every conceivable theory of knowledge.~The direct
 94 Intro|       Sophistical or Protagorean theory of language is opposed to
 95 Intro|     Socrates is conducted from a theory of sense to a theory of
 96 Intro|      from a theory of sense to a theory of ideas.~There is no reason
 97 Intro|       similitude of the Socratic theory of education (compare Republic,
 98 Intro|     trust Plato’s account of the theory of Protagoras; and he is
 99 Intro|        reconstruct out of them a theory of knowledge. The time at
100 Intro|         The time at which such a theory could be framed had not
101 Intro|    before Christ was not another theory of rest or motion, or Being
102 Intro|        perception.’ ‘That is the theory of Protagoras, who has another
103 Intro|       which is contrary to their theory. And did we not say, that
104 Intro|        are conscious or not.~The theory that ‘Knowledge is sensible
105 Intro|        there were reactions from theory to experience, from ideas
106 Intro|        manner of ways.’~III. The theory of Protagoras is connected
107 Intro|      which is not covered by his theory, viz. errors in arithmetic.
108 Intro|       with another and different theory, of those who assert that
109 Intro|         to the question, Why the theory that all knowledge is sensation
110 Text |     these cases the esse-percipi theory appears to be unmistakably
111 Text |    universal flux a ring: is the theory sound or not? at any rate,
112 Text |       leave the details of their theory unexamined, but we must
113 Text |         first; and thus the fine theory has again taken wings and
114 Text |      betray a great and imposing theory.~THEAETETUS: No, indeed.~


Timaeus
    Part
115 Intro|          are accused of making a theory first and finding their
116 Intro| indissolubly connected with some theory of one, two, or more elements.
117 Intro|          accordance with his own theory of ideas; and as we cannot
118 Intro|      find traces of the Platonic theory of knowledge expressed in
119 Intro|          meaning to it. And this theory is exhibited in so many
120 Intro|          fact.~He has a singular theory of respiration for which
121 Intro|        we see that this singular theory is dependent on two principles
122 Intro|       closely connected with his theory of respiration. Digestion
123 Intro|        which is derived from his theory of the universe, and transferred
124 Intro|        there is much also in his theory of the universe which is
125 Intro|         is not a bad basis for a theory of colours. We must remember
126 Intro|   remember, (1) that the nebular theory was the received belief
127 Intro|          arisen about the Atomic theory in which a point has been
128 Intro|         belongs the teleological theory of creation. Whether all
129 Intro|        in the Republic. Here the theory of Platonic ideas intrudes
130 Intro| Anaxagoras, while commencing his theory of the universe with ideas
131 Text |      suitable to give a rational theory of colours.~Of the particles