The Apology
    Part
  1 Intro|            as much greater than the Platonic defence as the master was
  2 Intro|            Xenophon.~The Apology or Platonic defence of Socrates is divided
  3 Intro|          degree of certainty to the Platonic Socrates only. For, although
  4 Intro| Schleiermacher, who argues that the Platonic defence is an exact or nearly


Charmides
    Part
  5 PreF |            Alexandrian Canon of the Platonic writings is deprived of
  6 PreS |           having an affinity to the Platonic Dialogues have been introduced
  7 PreS |            wanting in them. But the Platonic dialogue is a drama as well
  8 PreS |       anything of the pre-Socratic, Platonic, or Aristotelian meaning
  9 PreS |     entirely new explanation of the Platonic ‘Ideas.’ He supposes that
 10 PreS |        although in the Republic the platonic Socrates speaks of ‘a longer
 11 Intro|           shifting character of the Platonic philosophy) is given as
 12 Intro|          and first in the series of Platonic dialogues, are: (i) Their
 13 Intro|             recollection and of the Platonic ideas; the questions, whether
 14 Intro|             in the catalogue of the Platonic writings, though they are
 15 Intro|   conclusive. No arrangement of the Platonic dialogues can be strictly


Cratylus
    Part
 16 Intro|         ranked with the best of the Platonic writings, there has been
 17 Intro|       artists. According to a truly Platonic mode of approaching the
 18 Intro|            received doctrine of the Platonic ideas; secondly, the impression
 19 Intro|       dialogues, that the so-called Platonic ideas are only a semi-mythical


Critias
    Part
 20 Intro|         which, like the other great Platonic trilogy of the Sophist,


Euthyphro
    Part
 21 Intro|          the Euthyphro is a genuine Platonic writing. The spirit in which


The First Alcibiades
    Part
 22 Pre  |          evidence for and against a Platonic dialogue, we must not forget
 23 Pre  |         forget that the form of the Platonic writing was common to several
 24 Pre  |           the general spirit of the Platonic writings. But the testimony
 25 Pre  |         numerous citations from the Platonic writings he never attributes
 26 Pre  |            to genuineness among the Platonic writings, are the Lesser
 27 Pre  |      careful student of the earlier Platonic writings, to invent. The
 28 Pre  |           is ignorance, traces of a Platonic authorship. In reference
 29 Intro|     dialogue differs from any other Platonic composition. The aim is
 30 Intro|            is simpler than in other Platonic writings, and the conclusion


Gorgias
    Part
 31 Intro|           we attempt to confine the Platonic dialogue on the Procrustean
 32 Intro|              are never far off in a Platonic discussion. But because


Ion
    Part
 33 Intro|              like the other earlier Platonic Dialogues, is a mixture
 34 Intro|      obtained, but some Socratic or Platonic truths are allowed dimly
 35 Intro|            argument that this truly Platonic little work is not a forgery


Menexenus
    Part
 36 Pre  |          evidence for and against a Platonic dialogue, we must not forget
 37 Pre  |         forget that the form of the Platonic writing was common to several
 38 Pre  |           the general spirit of the Platonic writings. But the testimony
 39 Pre  |         numerous citations from the Platonic writings he never attributes
 40 Pre  |            to genuineness among the Platonic writings, are the Lesser
 41 Pre  |      careful student of the earlier Platonic writings, to invent. The
 42 Pre  |           is ignorance, traces of a Platonic authorship. In reference
 43 Intro|      exercise than any other of the Platonic works. The writer seems
 44 Intro|             days and more, is truly Platonic.~Such discourses, if we
 45 Intro|            the dialogue has several Platonic traits, whether original
 46 Intro|           Alexandrian catalogues of Platonic writings.~


Meno
    Part
 47 Intro|            of Socrates is added the Platonic doctrine of reminiscence.
 48 Intro|          Socrates. Unlike the later Platonic Dialogues, the Meno arrives
 49 Intro|            This popular view of the Platonic ideas may be summed up in
 50 Intro|            is not remarked that the Platonic ideas are to be found only
 51 Intro|           power.~The account of the Platonic ideas in the Meno is the
 52 Intro|            one of the latest of the Platonic Dialogues, the conception
 53 Intro|            is the final form of the Platonic philosophy, so far as can
 54 Intro|         Organon of Aristotle or the Platonic idea of good. Many of the


Parmenides
    Part
 55 Intro|           is one of the best of the Platonic writings; the first portion
 56 Intro|          make Parmenides attack the Platonic Ideas, and then proceed
 57 Intro|             authorised canon of the Platonic writings, to condemn the
 58 Intro|          For the truth is, that the Platonic Ideas were in constant process
 59 Intro|         Plato (compare Essay on the Platonic Ideas in the Introduction
 60 Intro|            of all after-ages on the Platonic Ideas. For in some points
 61 Intro|    Parmenides raises respecting the Platonic ideas relates to the manner
 62 Intro|          more attempt to defend the Platonic Ideas by representing them
 63 Intro|             Kant, as well as of the Platonic ideas. It has been said
 64 Intro|             as in most of the other Platonic dialogues, to take a living
 65 Intro|             offered. May we say, in Platonic language, that we still
 66 Intro|        secondly, of Being. From the Platonic Ideas we naturally proceed
 67 Intro|           truer and deeper. For the Platonic Ideas are mere numerical
 68 Intro|             critique, first, of the Platonic Ideas, and secondly, of
 69 Intro|        either, which prove that the Platonic as well as the Eleatic doctrine
 70 Intro|         their final adjustment. The Platonic Ideas are tested by the
 71 Intro|         instead of transferring the Platonic Ideas into a crude Latin


Phaedo
    Part
 72 Intro|           well as pass to them.~The Platonic doctrine of reminiscence
 73 Intro|             that later stage of the Platonic writings at which the doctrine
 74 Intro|          intermediate period of the Platonic philosophy, which roughly
 75 Intro|         making a step by the aid of Platonic reminiscence, and a further


Phaedrus
    Part
 76 Intro|            titles of several of the Platonic Dialogues are a further
 77 Intro|        between the criticism of the Platonic ideas and of the Eleatic
 78 Intro|           the most beautiful of the Platonic Dialogues, is also more
 79 Intro|           the relation to the other Platonic Dialogues, seem to contradict
 80 Intro|     resemblance, is in the main the Platonic and not the real Socrates.
 81 Intro|     apprehending this aspect of the Platonic writings. First, we do not
 82 Intro|          forms or figures which the Platonic philosophy assumes, are
 83 Intro|    Aeschylus and Sophocles; and the Platonic Socrates is afraid that,


Philebus
    Part
 84 Intro|            expressed than any other Platonic dialogue. Here, as Plato
 85 Intro|             their origin in the old Platonic problem of the ‘One and
 86 Intro|             conception, such as the Platonic ideal, but to chance and
 87 Intro|             chance and caprice. The Platonic Socrates pursues the same
 88 Intro|           are personified, what the Platonic ideas are to the idea of
 89 Intro|             nearly the whole of the Platonic writings. And here as in
 90 Intro|        Philebus than in the earlier Platonic writings. The germs of logic
 91 Intro|            the disappearance of the Platonic dialectic, which in the


Protagoras
    Part
 92 Intro|            already passing into the Platonic one. At a later stage of
 93 Intro|             At a later stage of the Platonic philosophy we shall find


The Second Alcibiades
    Part
 94 Pre  |         Plato. They are examples of Platonic dialogues to be assigned


The Sophist
    Part
 95 Intro|             crown and summit of the Platonic philosophy—here is the place
 96 Intro|          Sophist which occur in the Platonic writings. For Plato is not
 97 Intro|             some want of the higher Platonic art in the Eleatic Stranger
 98 Intro|          contradiction. Neither the Platonic notion of the negative as
 99 Intro|             and the relation of the Platonic and Hegelian dialectic.~
100 Intro|     understand them would deny.~The Platonic unity of differences or
101 Intro|  nevertheless a discovery which, in Platonic language, may be termed


The Statesman
    Part
102 Intro|          Yet the ideal glory of the Platonic philosophy is not extinguished.
103 Intro|       doubting the genuineness of a Platonic writing.~The search after
104 Intro|    questioned by three such eminent Platonic scholars as Socher, Schaarschmidt,
105 Intro|       venture slightly to enlarge a Platonic thought which admits of
106 Intro|        genuineness and order of the Platonic dialogues has been reserved
107 Intro|          with the great body of the Platonic writings.~


The Symposium
    Part
108 Intro|             And more than any other Platonic work the Symposium is Greek
109 Intro|            well-regulated mind. The Platonic Socrates (for of the real


Theaetetus
    Part
110 Intro|            may be called the Second Platonic Trilogy. Both the Parmenides
111 Intro|            general character of the Platonic dialogues. On a first reading
112 Intro|          abstract, and not only the Platonic Ideas and the Eleatic Being,
113 Intro|           which is to supersede the Platonic reminiscence of Ideas as


Timaeus
    Part
114 Intro|           deeper foundations of the Platonic philosophy, such as the
115 Intro|            that of any other of the Platonic dialogues. The language
116 Intro|        section I shall consider the Platonic astronomy, and the position
117 Intro|        explain the first God in the Platonic system, who has sometimes
118 Intro|         remark in passing, that the Platonic compared with the Jewish
119 Intro|    Everywhere we find traces of the Platonic theory of knowledge expressed
120 Intro|    scientific than any other of the Platonic dialogues. It is conjectural
121 Intro|              than to refer to other Platonic writings,—and still less
122 Intro|        Republic. Here the theory of Platonic ideas intrudes upon us.
123 Intro|      sentence or two not wanting in Platonic irony (Greek—a word to the