Charmides
    Part
  1 PreF |      involve an anachronism in the history of philosophy. There is
  2 PreF |            and by his place in the history of philosophy. We are not
  3 PreS |      respecting ancient and modern history), for they are separated
  4 PreS |        created one of the mists of history, like the Trojan war or
  5 Intro|          of the latter in Athenian history. He is simply a cultivated
  6 Intro|    resemblance to the Charmides of history, except, perhaps, the modest
  7 Intro|          represents a stage in the history of philosophy in which knowledge


Cratylus
    Part
  8 Intro|     recollection of their own past history; the use of a word in a
  9 Intro|          again, when we follow the history of languages, we observe
 10 Intro|           enquiries into the early history of man—of interpreting the
 11 Intro|        give us an insight into the history of the human mind and the
 12 Intro|        silent notes of the world’s history; they mark periods of unknown
 13 Intro|          it could only tell us the history of itself.~(5) There are
 14 Intro|            examined as well in the history of our own language as of
 15 Intro|          in the later stage of the history of language ceases to act
 16 Intro|        most critical period in the history of language is the transition
 17 Intro|         also the larger context of history and circumstances.~The study
 18 Intro|          Paul’s ‘Principles of the History of Language:’ to the latter


Critias
    Part
 19 Intro|            of man, and the dawn of history was now to succeed the philosophy
 20 Intro|           an allusion to the later history. Hence we may safely conclude
 21 Text |         ocean. The progress of the history will unfold the various


Euthydemus
    Part
 22 Intro|         logic. But if the order of history were followed, they should
 23 Intro|       light which they shed on the history of the human mind.~There
 24 Intro|            are comprehended in the history of the human mind, as in
 25 Intro|            There is a stage in the history of philosophy in which the


The First Alcibiades
    Part
 26 Pre  |        gloomier events of Athenian history. It exhibits an acquaintance


Gorgias
    Part
 27 Intro|         have seemed to reflect the history of his life.~And now the
 28 Intro|      reference to his place in the history of thought and the opinion
 29 Intro|          and have become a part of history, mankind are disposed to
 30 Intro|    excepting the greatest names of history. Mankind have an uneasy
 31 Intro|            by applying them to the history of our own country. He would
 32 Intro|          the course of the world’s history —Christ himself being one
 33 Intro|          of Atlantis, an imaginary history, which is a fragment only,


Laws
    Book
 34 3    |      Lacedaemonians as part of the history of Sparta.~Megillus. To


Menexenus
    Part
 35 Pre  |        gloomier events of Athenian history. It exhibits an acquaintance
 36 Intro|       ancestors, and the legendary history of Athens, to which succeeded
 37 Intro|            weak places of Athenian history. The war of Athens and Boeotia
 38 Intro|            and falsehoods in which history is disguised. The taking


Meno
    Part
 39 Intro|  resembling the same characters in history. The repulsive picture which
 40 Intro|          of idealism, which in the history of philosophy has had many
 41 Intro|         Plato’s abridgement of the history of philosophy (Soph.), is
 42 Intro|   conception of language or of the history of philosophy. Hume’s paradox
 43 Intro|  previously mentioned systems, the history of the human mind and the
 44 Intro|         Their origin is only their history, so far as we know it; there
 45 Intro|           strike far down into the history of philosophy. It is a method


Parmenides
    Part
 46 Intro|     citizen of no mean city in the history of philosophy, who is the
 47 Intro|          held by Parmenides in the history of Greek philosophy. He
 48 Intro|          that a long period in the history of philosophy was a barren
 49 Intro|          equally regardless of the history of the mind, sought to save
 50 Intro|          ideas; we can trace their history; we can criticize their
 51 Intro|      another, but deeply rooted in history and in the human mind.~


Phaedo
    Part
 52 Intro|       eternal ideas; of man, has a history in time, which may be traced
 53 Intro|       successes fill a page in the history of his country. The praises
 54 Intro|            increasing knowledge of history and of nature. They have
 55 Intro|         which is observable in the history of the world and of the
 56 Intro|            particular stage in the history of thought. The doctrine
 57 Intro|       analysis of language and the history of the human mind. The question, ‘
 58 Intro|           passages of his personal history. To his old enemies the
 59 Intro|          Socrates and Plato in the history of philosophy. They were
 60 Intro|       modern, nothing in poetry or history (with one exception), like


Phaedrus
    Part
 61 Intro|          first time perhaps in the history of philosophy, we have represented
 62 Intro|      ourselves,’ without regard to history or experience? Might he
 63 Intro|  phenomenon unique in the literary history of the world. How could
 64 Intro|        droop and languish? Why did history degenerate into fable? Why
 65 Intro|           the want of criticism in history, the want of simplicity
 66 Intro|          other long periods in the history of the human race, was destitute,


Philebus
    Part
 67 Intro|            our moral ideas. In the history of the world, which viewed
 68 Intro|          viewed from within is the history of the human mind, they
 69 Intro|          is a brief outline of the history of our moral ideas. We have
 70 Intro|         another; to determine what history, what philosophy has contributed
 71 Intro|       Bentham, a great word in the history of philosophy would have
 72 Intro|          Lastly, if we turn to the history of ethics, we shall find
 73 Intro|         and experience, in nature, history, and in our own minds.~Thirdly,
 74 Intro|       interpretation only from the history of philosophy in later ages.


The Seventh Letter
    Part
 75 Text |           by doing so. This is the history so far of my efforts to


The Sophist
    Part
 76 Intro|            to be sought for in the history of ideas, and the answer
 77 Intro| syncretisms or eclecticisms in the history of philosophy. A modern
 78 Intro|           also a divine ideal. The history of philosophy stripped of
 79 Intro|          circumstance expands into history. (iii) Whether regarded
 80 Intro|         have confused God with the history of philosophy, and to have
 81 Intro|         the succession of ideas in history and the natural order of
 82 Intro|            order of thought in the history of philosophy would be as
 83 Intro|          recent discoveries in the history of religion.~Hegel is fond
 84 Intro|            the order of thought in history. There is unfortunately
 85 Intro|  coincidence of philosophy and the history of philosophy appear. Many
 86 Intro|         relative in the subsequent history of thought. But Hegel employs
 87 Intro|        mere waif or stray in human history, any more than he is the
 88 Intro|            apart from his personal history, or the doctrines of Christ
 89 Intro|            be a true theory of the history of philosophy which, in
 90 Intro|         from the vantage-ground of history and experience. The enthusiasm
 91 Intro|          of human thought with the history of philosophy, and still
 92 Intro|          of their connexion in the history of thought. But we recognize
 93 Intro|            them. The philosophy of history and the history of philosophy
 94 Intro|      philosophy of history and the history of philosophy may be almost


The Statesman
    Part
 95 Intro|            a former cycle of human history, and may again exist when
 96 Intro|         greatest difficulty in the history of pre-historic man is solved.
 97 Intro|         Great changes occur in the history of nations, but they are
 98 Intro|            have been crises in the history of nations, as at the time


The Symposium
    Part
 99 Intro|            The experience of Greek history confirms the truth of his
100 Intro|           vices, which meets us in history—are drawn to the life; and
101 Intro|          recollection of his after history. He seems to have been present


Theaetetus
    Part
102 Intro|    reference to their place in the history of philosophy, and secondly,
103 Intro|          without a parallel in the history of philosophy and theology.~
104 Intro|      antecedents which we trace in history, and more especially in
105 Intro|         and more especially in the history of philosophy. Nor can mental
106 Intro|     consciousness apart from their history. They have a growth of their
107 Intro|        2ndly, their agreement with history and experience. But sensation
108 Intro|        like our other ideas, has a history. The Homeric poems contain
109 Intro|       human mind without regard to history or language or the social
110 Intro|           only be learned from the history of the world. It has no
111 Intro|             that is to say, in the history of the individual or of
112 Intro|            the most sacred part of history. We study the mind of man
113 Intro|       human life, as a part of the history of philosophy, as an aspect
114 Intro|          experience of others. The history of language, of philosophy,


Timaeus
    Part
115 Intro|            and by the contemporary history of thought. We know that
116 Intro|          Homer were to early Greek history. They made men think of
117 Intro|            be again periods in the history of modern philosophy which
118 Intro|           a curious chapter in the history of the human mind. The tale
119 Intro|          be an exact and veritable history. In the Middle Ages the
120 Intro|      columns in Egypt on which the history of the Island of Atlantis
121 Intro|         Egypt had ceased to have a history and began to appropriate
122 Intro|       saying of Hegel, that ‘Greek history began with the youth Achilles