The Apology
   Part
 1 Intro|          in the face of death. The facts of his life are summed up,
 2 Intro|          Xenophon, a chronicler of facts; he does not appear in any
 3 Intro|        remembered, and some of the facts recorded must have actually


Cratylus
   Part
 4 Intro|          at last in a statement of facts. But, in order to state
 5 Intro|            state or understand the facts, a metaphysical insight
 6 Intro|           of language is proved by facts. It is not difficult to
 7 Intro|            confusion of ideas with facts—of mere possibilities, and
 8 Intro|          exactly correspond to the facts of language; for they too
 9 Intro|            from the observation of facts, only to envelope it in
10 Intro|           more and more refuted by facts, and more and more going
11 Intro|   sentences. (2) It is relative to facts, to time, place, and occasion:


Critias
   Part
12 Intro|            reference to the actual facts. The desire to do honour


Laches
   Part
13 Intro|            with which Plato treats facts. For the scene must be supposed


Laws
   Book
14 1    |        states, in making words and facts coincide so that there can
15 3    |   mentioned? For we have come upon facts which have brought us back
16 3    |         and such probably were the facts.~Athenian. Yes; and the
17 7    |          ought to infer from these facts, that every soul which from


Meno
   Part
18 Intro|          are not more certain than facts, but they are equally certain (
19 Intro|          are not only derived from facts, but they are also prior
20 Intro|       little or nothing to do with facts of science. On the other
21 Intro|            is less able to observe facts, because they are too much
22 Intro|          not much nearer to actual facts than the Organon of Aristotle
23 Intro|            of the investigation of facts is as much insisted upon
24 Intro|           against the most certain facts. And here, again, we may
25 Intro|           ancients. He goes beyond facts in his scepticism, as they
26 Intro|           are tending to go beyond facts. They are thought to be
27 Intro|          little relation to actual facts as the ideas of Plato. Few


Parmenides
   Part
28 Intro|  instruments of thought to express facts.~Socrates attempts to support
29 Intro|          ideas were only universal facts, and that there might be
30 Intro|     inexact notions let us turn to facts.’ The time has not yet arrived
31 Intro|     constantly put in the place of facts, even by writers who profess
32 Intro|  conviction that we are resting on facts. We do not consider how


Phaedo
   Part
33 Intro|           to have proved to him by facts that all things are for


Phaedrus
   Part
34 Text |           follows the statement of facts, and upon that witnesses;
35 Text |          cases in which the actual facts, if they are improbable,


Philebus
   Part
36 Intro|            inwards, beginning with facts of sense, and passing to
37 Intro|            real explanation of the facts, (2) that they should inspire


The Republic
   Book
38 6    |            leave words and look at facts, the persons who are thus


The Seventh Letter
   Part
39 Text |            to Plato. What were the facts about this attachment? I
40 Text |           will deal fully with the facts about my second visit; what
41 Text |          anyone, after hearing the facts, forms a poor opinion of
42 Text |     trustee. These were the actual facts which occurred up to the


The Sophist
   Part
43 Intro|          appear to be justified by facts: and, 1, about the meaning
44 Intro|          is not in accordance with facts,’ ‘This is proved by experience
45 Intro|          of comprehending all true facts.~The Hegelian dialectic
46 Intro|    abstractions, and loses hold of facts. The glass which is adapted
47 Intro|          distinguishing ideas from facts. And certainly we can scarcely
48 Intro|        obscure our appreciation of facts. As the complexity of mechanics
49 Intro|      adapted for the expression of facts. It has never applied the
50 Intro|         has entirely lost sight of facts. Nor can the necessity which
51 Text |         distance from the truth of facts, by exhibiting to them fictitious
52 Text | speculations are overturned by the facts of life?~THEAETETUS: That


The Statesman
   Part
53 Intro|          the difficult language of facts. Let us, then, take an example,
54 Intro|          and difficult language of facts;’ and ‘the interrogation
55 Intro|            us and at variance with facts. The philosopher or theologian
56 Text |            language (syllables) of facts, is again ignorant of them?~


Theaetetus
   Part
57 Intro|           not through an appeal to facts, but by the help of general
58 Intro|        Republic). And as there are facts of sense which are perceived
59 Intro|           reflection on a very few facts.~II. The saying that ‘All
60 Intro|            observer and relater of facts, a truer measure of the
61 Intro|          historical and scientific facts he may be absolutely assured.
62 Intro|           of error, in the case of facts derived from sense.~Another
63 Intro|           in possession of all the facts which prove an act of violence,
64 Intro|        warred against the plainest facts.~Three attempts to explain
65 Intro|          have been. The so-called ‘facts of consciousness’ are equally
66 Intro|       equally evanescent; they are facts which nobody ever saw, and
67 Intro|         ultimately resolvable into facts which come to us through
68 Intro|           cannot indeed get beyond facts, but neither can we draw
69 Intro|           any line which separates facts from ideas. And the mind
70 Intro|    severely drawn the line between facts and opinions. It has substituted
71 Intro|             is a fiction only. Yet facts which are partly true gather
72 Intro|        fourthly, of the form which facts relating to the mind most
73 Intro|         words always correspond to facts. Common language represents
74 Intro|           called attention to many facts and corrected many errors,
75 Intro|        veil of language intercepts facts. Hence it is desirable that
76 Intro|      degree to our stock of mental facts.~f. The parallelism of the
77 Intro|   difficult to distinguish outward facts from the ideas of them in
78 Intro|             but as a collection of facts bearing on human life, as
79 Intro|       rests upon a small number of facts; and when we go beyond these,
80 Intro|            verbal discussions. The facts themselves are disjointed;
81 Intro|       concerned in Psychology. The facts relating to the mind which
82 Text |       other, for in both cases the facts precisely correspond;—and


Timaeus
   Part
83 Intro|        description of astronomical facts or contemplating processes
84 Intro|            first and finding their facts afterwards, the advocates
85 Intro|            world. The most general facts or appearances of nature,
86 Intro|          investigation of isolated facts, for which the time had
87 Intro|            Whewell, ‘and plenty of facts; but their ideas did not
88 Intro|           accurately represent the facts with which they were acquainted.’
89 Intro|            by their collections of facts. When the thinkers of modern
90 Intro|          which is at variance with facts and has failed to satisfy
91 Intro|        easily did the most obvious facts which were inconsistent
92 Intro|        reasoning about very simple facts, or an inability to understand
93 Intro|           reminds us of anatomical facts. But we find much which
94 Intro|    teachers, on their confusion of facts and ideas, on their inconsistency
95 Intro|         apprehension of particular facts, the metaphysical to the
96 Intro|            body, between ideas and facts. Have not many discussions
97 Intro|         grounds. For there were no facts of which the ancients were
98 Intro|           assured by experience as facts of number. Having observed
99 Intro|         been supported by physical facts.~The Timaeus also contains