Charmides
   Part
 1 PreS |           him. The familiar use of logic, and the progress of science,
 2 PreS |          He lived in an age before logic and system had wholly permeated
 3 Intro|       beginning of metaphysics and logic implied in the two questions:


Cratylus
   Part
 4 Intro|         and predicate. Grammar and logic were moving about somewhere
 5 Intro|         ingenious follies of early logic; in the Cratylus he is ridiculing
 6 Intro|         retained at the end of our logic books; and the etymologies
 7 Intro|           influence of grammar and logic, and by the poetical and
 8 Intro|       complete. At a later period, logic and grammar, sister arts,
 9 Intro|          are contained grammar and logic—the parts of speech, the
10 Intro|            analysis of grammar and logic has always existed, or that
11 Intro|      speech with the categories of Logic. Nor do we conceive languages
12 Intro|           of meaning and sound, of logic and grammar, of differing


Euthydemus
   Part
13 Intro|          be the oldest treatise on logic; for that science originates
14 Intro|          the end of our manuals of logic. But if the order of history
15 Intro|            illusions of words.~The logic of Aristotle is for the
16 Intro|          the important elements of logic, not yet systematized or
17 Intro|          the kind to which ancient logic can be usefully applied.
18 Intro|            use of the Aristotelian logic any longer natural to us.
19 Intro|           who have no knowledge of logic, like some of our great
20 Intro|            be the natural limit of logic and metaphysics; if they
21 Intro|         The better part of ancient logic appears hardly in our own
22 Intro|    ambiguity of language. The term logic has two different meanings,
23 Intro|      certainly be a new science of logic; it would not however be
24 Intro|           first and second part of logic. Ancient logic would be
25 Intro|      second part of logic. Ancient logic would be the propaedeutic
26 Intro|         trifling in the age before logic, in the decline of the earlier
27 Text |         skill in the subtleties of logic, which is really amazing,


Gorgias
   Part
28 Intro|         are made aware that formal logic has as yet no existence.
29 Intro|         the requirements of modern logic, as to criticise this ideal
30 Intro|             whether justifiable by logic or not, have always existed
31 Intro|           ordinary requirements of logic. Yet in the highest sense


Lysis
   Part
32 Intro|            of eristic or illogical logic against which no definition
33 Intro|     contribution to the science of logic. Some higher truths appear


Meno
   Part
34 Intro|           akin to the Aristotelian logic.~Yet amid all these varieties
35 Intro|           instrument, the forms of logic— arms ready for use, but
36 Intro|          the ancient and mediaeval logic retained a continuous influence
37 Intro|          they are seen. The common logic says ‘the greater the extension,


Parmenides
   Part
38 Intro|    phraseology, of metaphysics and logic (Theaet., Soph.). Like Plato,
39 Intro|            processes which a later logic designates by the terms ‘
40 Intro|          is due to their illogical logic, and to the general ignorance
41 Intro|            exaggerates one side of logic and forgets the rest. It
42 Intro|         foundation of the Hegelian logic. The mind must not only


Phaedo
   Part
43 Intro|       Plato to the requirements of logic. For what idea can we form
44 Intro|    conclusion that we are carrying logic too far, and that the attempt
45 Intro|          17. Living in an age when logic was beginning to mould human
46 Intro|            verbal fallacies: early logic is always mistaking the


Philebus
   Part
47 Intro|    Platonic writings. The germs of logic are beginning to appear,
48 Intro|          the anticipation of a new logic, that ‘In going to war for


The Sophist
   Part
49 Intro|          other processes of formal logic, presents a very inadequate
50 Intro|      definition. In the infancy of logic, men sought only to obtain
51 Intro|          Plato, in the days before logic, seems to be more correct
52 Intro|          of language.~The ordinary logic is also jealous of the explanation
53 Intro|              the science of ousia, logic or metaphysics, philosophers
54 Intro|          mechanism of language and logic is carried by him into another
55 Intro|          and widened by the formal logic which elevates the defects
56 Intro|       chiefly in the categories of logic. For abstractions, though
57 Intro|          The threefold division of logic, physic, and ethics, foreshadowed
58 Intro|            elements’ of scholastic logic which he has thrown down.
59 Intro|           be the sole or universal logic, we naturally reply that
60 Intro|       conceived under the forms of logic, but in which no single
61 Intro|       suspecting that the Hegelian logic has been in some degree
62 Intro|          first and second parts of logic in the Hegelian system has
63 Intro|          divisions of the Hegelian logic bear a superficial resemblance
64 Intro|        divisions of the scholastic logic. The first part answers
65 Intro| reintroducing the forms of the old logic? Who ever thinks of the
66 Intro|            the old, and the common logic is the Procrustes’ bed into
67 Intro|         language of the scholastic logic has become technical to
68 Intro|       neither has all this load of logic extinguished in him the
69 Intro|            touch with the spear of logic the follies and self-deceptions
70 Intro|         trivialities of the common logic and the unmeaningness of ‘
71 Intro|       influences of the scholastic logic.~3. Many of those who are
72 Intro|      recognize in his system a new logic supplying a variety of instruments
73 Intro|          important contribution to logic. We cannot affirm that words


Theaetetus
   Part
74 Intro|       dialogues. In the infancy of logic, a form of thought has to
75 Intro|          severity of an impossible logic, if half-truths have been
76 Intro|       attempts to attain a severer logic, were making knowledge impossible (
77 Intro|       certain laws of language and logic to which we are compelled
78 Intro|          meshes of a more advanced logic. To which Protagoras is
79 Intro|            quibbles, which destroy logic, ‘Not only man, but each
80 Intro|      generation, while a perverted logic carried out his chance expressions
81 Intro|            combating the illogical logic of the Megarians and Eristics.
82 Intro|            of the inner world. For logic teaches us that every word
83 Intro|       words—some natural or latent logic— some previous experience
84 Intro|         are sham sciences which no logic has ever put to the test,


Timaeus
   Part
85 Intro|         the language of the common logic, the greater the extension
86 Intro|            Plotinus, of misapplied logic, of misunderstood grammar,
87 Intro|       enthusiasm, how the forms of logic and rhetoric may usurp the