The Apology
   Part
 1 Intro|           begins by clearing up a confusion. In the representations
 2 Intro|      replies Socrates, is the old confusion about Anaxagoras; the Athenian


Charmides
   Part
 3 Intro|          distinguished. Hence the confusion between them, and the easy
 4 Text |   enamoured of him; amazement and confusion reigned when he entered;


Cratylus
   Part
 5 Intro|         exposed. (1) There is the confusion of ideas with facts—of mere
 6 Intro|      searching for words, and the confusion of them with one another,
 7 Intro|         not without admixture and confusion and displacement and contamination


Gorgias
   Part
 8 Intro|           be just—here is the old confusion of the arts and the virtues;—
 9 Intro|        his adversaries. From this confusion of jest and earnest, we


Laches
   Part
10 Intro|           for their words are all confusion, although their actions


Laws
   Book
11 2    |          experienced see all this confusion, and yet the poets go on
12 3    |            and making one general confusion; ignorantly affirming that
13 4    |          throwing all things into confusion, and many think that he
14 6    |        but there is obscurity and confusion as to what sort of equality
15 7    |           not limp and draggle in confusion when his opponent makes
16 10   |          answering, giddiness and confusion of mind, and hence a feeling
17 12   |        another is apt to create a confusion of manners; strangers, are
18 12   |      reverse of well–ordered, the confusion which arises in them from


Lysis
   Part
19 Text |           in great excitement and confusion at what had been said, and


Meno
   Part
20 Text |           whose ideas are in such confusion?~MENO: I should say, certainly


Parmenides
   Part
21 Intro|        told, have originated in a confusion of the ‘copula,’ and the ‘
22 Intro|        guard against the error or confusion which arises out of them.


Phaedo
   Part
23 Intro|           surely there is a great confusion of the cause and condition
24 Intro|   condition in all this. And this confusion also leads people into all
25 Intro|    discussion we may clear away a confusion. We certainly do not mean
26 Intro|         Compare Republic.) Such a confusion was natural, and arose partly
27 Text |           us, causing turmoil and confusion in our enquiries, and so
28 Text |      shaken seemed to introduce a confusion and uncertainty, not only
29 Text |         There is surely a strange confusion of causes and conditions
30 Text |          existence. Not that this confusion signifies to them, who never


Phaedrus
   Part
31 Intro|          to increase this sort of confusion.~As is often the case in
32 Intro|          real error, which is the confusion of preliminary knowledge
33 Text |           soul will not be put to confusion. For the body which is moved
34 Text |         to be first; and there is confusion and perspiration and the


Philebus
   Part
35 Intro|         dialogue, and a degree of confusion and incompleteness in the
36 Intro|          There appears to be some confusion in this passage. There is
37 Intro|         well as of ourselves; the confusion (not made by Aristotle)
38 Text |      which we may dispel all this confusion, no more excellent way of
39 Text |      confused medley which brings confusion on the possessor of it.~


Protagoras
   Part
40 Text |          perceiving this terrible confusion of our ideas, have a great


The Republic
   Book
41 4    |     qualified object. ~But here a confusion may arise; and I should
42 4    |           vassal-what is all this confusion and delusion but injustice,
43 10   |        liable. Thus every sort of confusion is revealed within us; and
44 10   |      instance of sight there were confusion and opposition in his opinions


The Sophist
   Part
45 Intro|           the Euthydemus. It is a confusion of falsehood and negation,
46 Intro| perplexity only arises out of the confusion of the human faculties;
47 Text |         may have fallen into some confusion, and be too ready to assent
48 Text |           ancients there was some confusion of ideas, which prevented


The Statesman
   Part
49 Text |           elapsed, the tumult and confusion and earthquake ceased, and


The Symposium
   Part
50 Intro|      other applied sciences. That confusion begins in the concrete,
51 Intro|           seems to arise out of a confusion between the abstract ideas
52 Text |          say, has arisen out of a confusion of love and the beloved,
53 Text |         themselves at home; great confusion ensued, and every one was


Theaetetus
   Part
54 Intro|           we first get rid of the confusion of the idea of knowledge
55 Intro|    specific kinds of knowledge,—a confusion which has been already noticed
56 Intro|         contrast of opinions. The confusion caused by the irony of Socrates,
57 Intro|      mental progress are times of confusion; we only see, or rather
58 Intro|          there is a corresponding confusion and want of retentiveness;
59 Intro|      ignorance. Error, then, is a confusion of thought and sense.~Theaetetus
60 Intro|          errors where there is no confusion of mind and sense? e.g.
61 Intro|        make no progress.~All this confusion arises out of our attempt
62 Intro|  explained by Plato at first as a confusion of mind and sense, which
63 Intro|        kept altogether clear of a confusion, which the analogous word
64 Intro|        definition? And is not the confusion increased by the use of
65 Intro|          light and order into the confusion. At what point confusion
66 Intro|          confusion. At what point confusion becomes distinctness is
67 Intro|   conceptions there seems to be a confusion of the individual and the
68 Intro|           by such a resolution or confusion of them. For we have not
69 Text |          lay the blame of his own confusion and perplexity on himself,
70 Text |     retain, and are not liable to confusion, but have true thoughts,
71 Text |          cannot be explained as a confusion of thought and sense, for


Timaeus
   Part
72 Intro|      physical science, out of the confusion of theological, mathematical,
73 Intro|        was rescued from chaos and confusion by their power; the notes
74 Intro|           of Anaxagoras: ‘All was confusion, and then mind came and
75 Intro|         appointed place. Into the confusion (Greek) which preceded Plato
76 Intro|        ancient teachers, on their confusion of facts and ideas, on their
77 Intro|         That there is a degree of confusion and indistinctness in Plato’
78 Intro|    perplexity. There is a similar confusion about necessity and free-will,
79 Intro|           been observed, that the confusion partly arises out of the
80 Intro|           things were in chaos or confusion, and then mind came and