Charmides
   Part
 1 PreF |         any single Dialogue. The hypothesis of a general plan which


Cratylus
   Part
 2 Intro|         not difficult to form an hypothesis which by a series of imaginary


Gorgias
   Part
 3 Text |        way, whatever may be your hypothesis.~GORGIAS: I think that you


Meno
   Part
 4 Intro|     mathematicians say, under an hypothesis. He will assume that if
 5 Intro| teachableness of virtue under an hypothesis, after the manner of the
 6 Text |          way,’ to be argued upon hypothesis? As the geometrician, when
 7 Text |          yet; but I will offer a hypothesis which may assist us in forming
 8 Text |     therefore I wish to assume a hypothesis before I tell you whether
 9 Text |            that is a geometrical hypothesis. And we too, as we know
10 Text |        or is not taught, under a hypothesis: as thus, if virtue is of
11 Text |     taught or not? Let the first hypothesis be that virtue is or is
12 Text |      virtue is a good?—This is a hypothesis which is not set aside.~


Parmenides
   Part
13 Intro|     ridicule by showing that the hypothesis of the existence of the
14 Intro|     greater absurdities than the hypothesis of the one. The book was
15 Intro|        which follow from a given hypothesis, but the consequences also
16 Intro|    follow from the denial of the hypothesis. For example, what follows
17 Intro|  affirmative and on the negative hypothesis,—that is, if you are to
18 Intro|        would follow from a given hypothesis, but what would follow from
19 Intro|      which is the subject of the hypothesis, and to all other things.
20 Intro|          as well as the positive hypothesis, with reference to the consequences
21 Intro|          divisions: There is the hypothesis that~1. One is. 2. One is
22 Intro|          applied to the negative hypothesis: 2.a. If one is not one,
23 Intro|   subject? Suppose I take my own hypothesis of the one.’ ‘By all means,’
24 Intro|       again, assume the opposite hypothesis, that the one is not, and
25 Intro|        is the destruction of the hypothesis; and one cannot be equal
26 Intro|         of ways.~I. On the first hypothesis we may remark: first, That
27 Text |   retorting upon them that their hypothesis of the being of many, if
28 Text |         more ridiculous than the hypothesis of the being of one. Zeal
29 Text |          which flow from a given hypothesis, but also the consequences
30 Text |      which flow from denying the hypothesis; and that will be still
31 Text |         in the case of this very hypothesis of Zeno’s about the many,
32 Text |      itself and the many, on the hypothesis of the being of the many,
33 Text |      each other, on the opposite hypothesis. Or, again, if likeness
34 Text |     cases to the subjects of the hypothesis, and to other things, in
35 Text |          you; will you take some hypothesis and go through the steps?—
36 Text |          what shall be our first hypothesis, if I am to attempt this
37 Text |          myself, and take my own hypothesis the one? and consider the
38 Text |        once more to the original hypothesis; let us see whether, on
39 Text |         that one is one; but our hypothesis is not if one is one, what
40 Text |       will follow. Does not this hypothesis necessarily imply that one
41 Text |          consider again upon the hypothesis that the one is, whether
42 Text |       What is the meaning of the hypothesis—If the one is not; is there
43 Text |  difference between this and the hypothesis—If the not one is not?~There
44 Text |      must be meant; nor will the hypothesis relate to one; but it will


Phaedo
   Part
45 Intro|      back to some higher idea or hypothesis which appears to him to
46 Intro|      only answer by an imaginary hypothesis. Nor is it difficult to


Phaedrus
   Part
47 Text |          to that of which by the hypothesis he is ignorant?~PHAEDRUS:


Philebus
   Part
48 Intro|       world. Whatever may be the hypothesis on which they are explained,


The Republic
   Book
49 6    |         rise above the region of hypothesis, but employing the objects


The Sophist
   Part
50 Intro|          will consider the first hypothesis first of all.~(1) If we
51 Intro|        in the truth of the third hypothesis, that some things have communion
52 Text |    STRANGER: Then only the third hypothesis remains.~THEAETETUS: True.~
53 Text |          the third and remaining hypothesis of the communion of some


Theaetetus
   Part
54 Intro|     reductio ad absurdum” of the hypothesis that knowledge is sensible
55 Intro|         as they appear, yet this hypothesis cannot be extended to judgments
56 Intro|          are known. But this new hypothesis when tested by the letters
57 Intro| difficulty in following this new hypothesis. For must not opinion be
58 Intro|       science; but it is only an hypothesis or outline, which may be
59 Intro|      Psychology is not merely an hypothesis, but an hypothesis which,
60 Intro|     merely an hypothesis, but an hypothesis which, unlike the hypotheses
61 Text |        of this perplexity on the hypothesis which we attribute to Protagoras?~
62 Text | perception, certainly not on the hypothesis of a perpetual flux, unless


Timaeus
   Part
63 Intro|          are involved in such an hypothesis. All the objections which
64 Intro|       writings than the opposite hypothesis. For in the Phaedo the earth
65 Text |        examine the nature of our hypothesis. In order, then, that the