Paragraph

 1 2 |      certain point of grammatical knowledge is present in the mind,
 2 2 |          in a subject. Thus while knowledge is present in the human
 3 2 |      certain point of grammatical knowledge is present in a subject.~
 4 3 |            animal" and the genus "knowledge". "With feet", "two-footed", "
 5 3 |           animal"; the species of knowledge are not distinguished by
 6 3 |      differentiae. One species of knowledge does not differ from another
 7 5 |           the predicates convey a knowledge of primary substance. For
 8 7 |          disposition, perception, knowledge, and attitude. The significance
 9 7 |          is a habit of something, knowledge is knowledge of something,
10 7 |           something, knowledge is knowledge of something, attitude is
11 7 |       these both being relatives; knowledge, too, has a contrary, ignorance.
12 7 |          some instances. Thus, by knowledge we mean knowledge the knowable;
13 7 |        Thus, by knowledge we mean knowledge the knowable; by the knowable,
14 7 |           is to be apprehended by knowledge; by perception, perception
15 7 |         as "biped", "receptive of knowledge", "human", should be removed,
16 7 |     simultaneously. The object of knowledge would appear to exist before
17 7 |      would appear to exist before knowledge itself, for it is usually
18 7 |          the case that we acquire knowledge of objects already existing;
19 7 |   impossible, to find a branch of knowledge the beginning of the existence
20 7 |        Again, while the object of knowledge, if it ceases to exist,
21 7 |      cancels at the same time the knowledge which was its correlative,
22 7 |        true that if the object of knowledge does not exist there can
23 7 |         not exist there can be no knowledge: for there will no longer
24 7 |          is equally true that, if knowledge of a certain object does
25 7 |           process is an object of knowledge, though it itself exists
26 7 |     itself exists as an object of knowledge, yet the knowledge of it
27 7 |      object of knowledge, yet the knowledge of it has not yet come into
28 7 |          exist, there would be no knowledge, but there might yet be
29 7 |      might yet be many objects of knowledge.~This is likewise the case
30 7 |         would be supposition, not knowledge. For if he does not know
31 8 | established. The various kinds of knowledge and of virtue are habits,
32 8 |         of virtue are habits, for knowledge, even when acquired only
33 8 |          who are not retentive of knowledge, but volatile, are not said
34 8 |         such a "habit" as regards knowledge, yet they are disposed,
35 8 |          better or worse, towards knowledge. Thus habit differs from
36 8 |          the individual not. Thus knowledge, as a genus, is explained
37 8 |     something else, for we mean a knowledge of something. But particular
38 8 |        But particular branches of knowledge are not thus explained.
39 8 |           not thus explained. The knowledge of grammar is not relative
40 8 |     anything external, nor is the knowledge of music, but these, if
41 8 |       thus grammar is said be the knowledge of something, not the grammar
42 8 |            similarly music is the knowledge of something, not the music
43 8 |       Thus individual branches of knowledge are not relative. And it
44 8 |      these individual branches of knowledge that we are said to be such
45 8 |        experts because we possess knowledge in some particular branch.
46 8 |           branches, therefore, of knowledge, in virtue of which we are
47 10|          the double of something. Knowledge, again, is the opposite
48 10|         relation to its opposite, knowledge. For the thing known is
49 10|         by something, that is, by knowledge. Such things, then, as are
50 15|         said to "have" a piece of knowledge or a virtue. Then, again,