Paragraph

 1 6 |           part of the whole has a relative position to the other parts:
 2 6 |      either of parts which bear a relative position each to each, or
 3 6 |        The parts of a line bear a relative position to each other,
 4 6 |        the arts of a number had a relative position each to each, or
 5 6 |         say that such parts had a relative order, in virtue of one
 6 6 |          may be said to possess a relative order, though it would be
 7 6 |         are not quantitative, but relative; things are not great or
 8 6 |        these are to be classed as relative.~Again, whether we define
 9 6 |       should call these terms not relative but quantitative, they would
10 7 |           Those things are called relative, which, being either said
11 7 |           terms, then, are called relative, the nature of which is
12 7 |          but attitude is itself a relative term. To lie, to stand,
13 7 |        them, and each of these is relative in character: for the terms "
14 7 |            again, it is not every relative term that admits of variation
15 7 |         So it is with every other relative term; but the case we use
16 7 |       made, and that to which the relative is related is not accurately
17 7 |        that a wing is necessarily relative to a bird, the connexion
18 7 |        the wing is not said to be relative to the bird qua bird, since
19 7 |           wing" will no longer be relative; for if the so-called correlative
20 7 |         true that no substance is relative, as seems to be the case,
21 7 |         of primary substances are relative. The individual man or ox
22 7 |  themselves. Wood, again, is only relative in so far as it is some
23 7 |        mentioned substance is not relative. But with regard to some
24 7 |       that these appear to have a relative character. Indeed, if our
25 7 |       definition of that which is relative was complete, it is very
26 7 |        prove that no substance is relative. If, however, our definition
27 7 |          only are properly called relative in the case of which relation
28 7 |           not make it essentially relative.~From this it is plain that,
29 7 |           definitely apprehends a relative thing, he will also definitely
30 7 |     apprehend that to which it is relative. Indeed this is self-evident:
31 7 |          some particular thing is relative, assuming that we call that
32 7 |      assuming that we call that a relative in the case of which relation
33 7 |         know whether or not it is relative. This is clear, moreover,
34 7 |          if a man apprehends some relative thing definitely, he necessarily
35 7 |          say that no substance is relative in character. It is perhaps
36 8 |        For it is rather a certain relative position of the parts composing
37 8 |          have included in it many relative terms. We did say that habits
38 8 |      habits and dispositions were relative. In practically all such
39 8 |           such cases the genus is relative, the individual not. Thus
40 8 |       knowledge of grammar is not relative to anything external, nor
41 8 |           of music, but these, if relative at all, are relative only
42 8 |           if relative at all, are relative only in virtue of their
43 8 |     branches of knowledge are not relative. And it is because we possess
44 8 | themselves qualities, and are not relative. Further, if anything should
45 10|    preposition. Thus, double is a relative term, for that which is
46 10|      blindness, therefore, were a relative, there would be a reciprocity