Paragraph

 1 2 |       man" is predicable of the individual man, and is never present
 2 2 |       of a subject, such as the individual man or the individual horse.
 3 2 |       the individual man or the individual horse. But, to speak more
 4 2 |        generally, that which is individual and has the character of
 5 3 |       man" is predicated of the individual man; but "animal" is predicated
 6 3 | therefore, be predicable of the individual man also: for the individual
 7 3 |    individual man also: for the individual man is both "man" and "animal".~
 8 5 |      subject; for instance, the individual man or horse. But in a secondary
 9 5 |      species. For instance, the individual man is included in the species "
10 5 |        man" is predicted of the individual man. Now in this case the
11 5 |  species man" is applied to the individual, for we use the term "man"
12 5 |          man" in describing the individual; and the definition of "
13 5 |       also be predicated of the individual man, for the individual
14 5 |         individual man, for the individual man is both man and animal.
15 5 |   species are predicable of the individual.~With regard, on the other
16 5 |          man", therefore of the individual man, for if there were no
17 5 |       man, for if there were no individual man of whom it could be
18 5 |   present in body, therefore in individual bodies, for if there were
19 5 |    bodies, for if there were no individual body in which it was present,
20 5 |       instructive account of an individual man by stating that he was
21 5 |  description is peculiar to the individual in a greater degree, while
22 5 |     account of the nature of an individual tree will give a more instructive
23 5 |      appropriate account of the individual man by stating the species
24 5 |  belonged, than we should of an individual horse by adopting the same
25 5 |      substance than another; an individual man is not more truly substance
26 5 |         truly substance than an individual ox.~It is, then, with good
27 5 |        appropriately define any individual man; and we shall make our
28 5 |         all such. If we call an individual man "skilled in grammar",
29 5 |       man" is predicated of the individual man, but is not present
30 5 |   manhood is not present in the individual man. In the same way, "animal"
31 5 |       is also predicated of the individual man, but is not present
32 5 |     genus with reference to the individual man. Thus substance cannot
33 5 |        their subject either the individual or the species. It is true
34 5 |    species is predicated of the individual, the genus both of the species
35 5 |       of the species and of the individual. Similarly the differentiae
36 5 |        to signify that which is individual. In the case of primary
37 5 |        indicating that which is individual, but the impression is not
38 5 |   secondary substance is not an individual, but a class with a certain
39 5 |  primary substance, such as the individual man or animal? It has none.
40 5 |    contrary qualities. The same individual person is at one time white,
41 7 |    substances are relative. The individual man or ox is not defined
42 8 |      the genus is relative, the individual not. Thus knowledge, as
43 8 |        music of something.~Thus individual branches of knowledge are
44 8 |        because we possess these individual branches of knowledge that
45 11|      obtain in one and the same individual at the same time, both these