| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] defining 1 definite 4 definitely 10 definition 31 degree 25 degrees 2 demonstration 1 | Frequency [« »] 33 would 32 animal 32 yet 31 definition 31 terms 30 again 30 both | Aristotle Categories IntraText - Concordances definition |
Paragraph
1 1| have a common name, the definition corresponding with the name 2 1| have a common name, the definition corresponding with the name 3 1| sense each is an animal, his definition in the one case will be 4 1| have both the name and the definition answering to the name in 5 1| only the name, but also the definition, is the same in both cases: 6 5| that both the name and the definition of the predicate must be 7 5| the individual; and the definition of "man" will also be predicated 8 5| Thus, both the name and the definition of the species are predicable 9 5| neither their name nor their definition is predicable of that in 10 5| present. Though, however, the definition is never predicable, there 11 5| body is called white: the definition, however, of the colour 12 5| adopting the same method of definition. In the same way, of primary 13 5| man; and we shall make our definition more exact by stating the 14 5| on, are irrelevant to the definition. Thus it is just that these 15 5| which it is present, the definition cannot be applied. Yet of 16 5| only the name, but also the definition, applies to the subject: 17 5| we should use both the definition of the species and that 18 5| not in man. Moreover, the definition of the differentia may be 19 5| of the species "man", the definition also of that characteristic 20 5| individuals. Moreover, the definition of the species and that 21 5| subject. Similarly, the definition of the differentiae will 22 5| which had both name and definition in common. It is, therefore, 23 7| reference to a boat, our definition will not be appropriate, 24 7| is no existing word, our definition would perhaps be more accurate 25 7| character. Indeed, if our definition of that which is relative 26 7| relative. If, however, our definition was not complete, if those 27 7| may be found.~The former definition does indeed apply to all 28 8| those things to which the definition of the triangle or circle 29 8| hand, to which the same definition is not applicable, cannot 30 8| rectangle, for to neither is the definition of the circle appropriate. 31 8| appropriate. In short, if the definition of the term proposed is